La Rocco M T, Wanger A, Ocera H, Macias E
Department of Pathology, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77225-0269.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Sep;13(9):726-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02276055.
A commercial assay (Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test, Gen Probe) which combines transcription-mediated amplification of target rRNA with amplicon detection by a chemiluminescent DNA probe for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum was evaluated. The test was applied to consecutively collected, NALC/NaOH processed sputum sediments from two laboratories (H and L), each serving a different population of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Results were compared to those of fluorochrome staining and culture. A total of 760 specimens obtained from 246 patients were used for the study. The test was positive in 141 of 144 (98%) specimens that were fluorochrome-positive and culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Fifteen of 31 specimens that were fluorochrome-negative, culture-positive were also assay-positive. A total of 312 specimens (100 patients) from laboratory H (prevalence = 10%) and 448 specimens (146 patients) from laboratory L (prevalence = 34%) were analyzed. Compared to culture, test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were 65%, 99%, 94% and 97%, respectively, for laboratory H and 93%, 99%, 99% and 97%, respectively, for laboratory L. If the results were analyzed on the basis of at least one concordant result between the amplification assay and culture in three sputum samples per patient, then the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for identifying infected patients was 70%, 99%, 87% and 97%, respectively, for laboratory H, and 100%, 98%, 96% and 100%, respectively, for laboratory L.
对一种商业检测方法(结核分枝杆菌直接扩增检测法,Gen Probe公司)进行了评估,该方法将靶rRNA的转录介导扩增与通过化学发光DNA探针检测扩增子相结合,用于快速检测痰中的结核分枝杆菌。该检测方法应用于从两个实验室(H和L)连续收集的经NALC/NaOH处理的痰沉淀物,每个实验室服务于不同的肺结核患者群体。将结果与荧光染色和培养结果进行比较。总共使用了从246名患者获得的760份标本进行研究。在144份结核分枝杆菌荧光染色阳性且培养阳性的标本中,该检测方法有141份(98%)呈阳性。31份荧光染色阴性但培养阳性的标本中有15份检测也呈阳性。对来自实验室H的312份标本(100名患者,患病率=10%)和来自实验室L的448份标本(146名患者,患病率=34%)进行了分析。与培养相比,实验室H的检测灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为65%、99%、94%和97%,实验室L的分别为93%、99%、99%和97%。如果根据每位患者三份痰标本中扩增检测和培养至少有一个一致结果来分析结果,那么实验室H识别感染患者的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为70%、99%、87%和97%,实验室L的分别为100%、98%、96%和100%。