Suppr超能文献

三种用于淋病奈瑟菌确证的发酵方法的比较

A comparison of three fermentation methods for the confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

作者信息

Brown W J

出版信息

Health Lab Sci. 1976 Jan;13(1):54-8.

PMID:816755
Abstract

When confirming suspected isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, laboratories use a fluorescent antibody method or a fermentation technique, usually the cystine-trypticase agar (CTA) semisolid. Suspected N. gonorrhoeae from sites such as the throat, rectum, and blood require this confirmation. The modified rapid fermentation test (MRFT) was compared with the standard CTA and the Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) slant methods. The MRFT appeared to have greater sensitivity than the other two methods, and results could be obtained within a 4-hour period as compared with overnight for the other two methods. The MRFT gave quicker results with greater sensitivity than either the MHA slant or the CTA semi-solid techniques.

摘要

在确认淋病奈瑟菌的疑似分离株时,实验室使用荧光抗体法或发酵技术,通常是胱氨酸胰蛋白酶琼脂(CTA)半固体培养基。来自咽喉、直肠和血液等部位的疑似淋病奈瑟菌需要进行这种确认。将改良快速发酵试验(MRFT)与标准CTA和穆勒-欣顿琼脂(MHA)斜面法进行了比较。MRFT似乎比其他两种方法具有更高的灵敏度,与其他两种方法需要过夜培养相比,该方法可在4小时内获得结果。与MHA斜面法或CTA半固体技术相比,MRFT能更快得出结果,且灵敏度更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验