Abikoff H, Courtney M, Pelham W E, Koplewicz H S
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Schneider Children's Hospital, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York 11042.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;21(5):519-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00916317.
This study evaluated the accuracy of teachers' ratings and examined whether these ratings are influenced by halo effects. One hundred thirty-nine elementary school teachers viewed videotapes of what they believed were children in regular fourth-grade classrooms. In fact, the children were actors who followed prepared scripts that depicted a child engaging in behaviors characteristic of an attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), an oppositional defiant disorder or a normal youngster. The findings provide support for a bias that was unidirectional in nature. Specifically, teachers rated hyperactive behaviors accurately when the child behaved like an ADHD youngster. However, ratings of hyperactivity and of ADHD symptomatic behaviors were spuriously inflated when behaviors associated with oppositional defiant disorder occurred. In contrast, teachers rated oppositional and conduct problem behaviors accurately, regardless of the presence of hyperactive behaviors. The implications of these findings regarding diagnostic practices and rating scale formats are discussed.
本研究评估了教师评分的准确性,并考察了这些评分是否受到光环效应的影响。139名小学教师观看了他们认为是四年级普通教室中儿童的录像带。实际上,这些儿童是演员,他们按照预先准备好的脚本表演,脚本描绘了一个表现出注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、对立违抗障碍或正常儿童特征行为的孩子。研究结果支持了一种本质上单向的偏差。具体而言,当孩子表现得像患有ADHD的儿童时,教师能够准确地对多动行为进行评分。然而,当出现与对立违抗障碍相关的行为时,多动和ADHD症状行为的评分会被虚假抬高。相比之下,无论是否存在多动行为,教师都能准确地对对立和品行问题行为进行评分。本文讨论了这些发现对诊断实践和评分量表形式的影响。