Suppr超能文献

芬兰疫情期间血清学方法在肺炎衣原体肺炎诊断中的评估

Evaluation of serological methods in the diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae pneumonia during an epidemic in Finland.

作者信息

Ekman M R, Leinonen M, Syrjälä H, Linnanmäki E, Kujala P, Saikku P

机构信息

Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Oct;12(10):756-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02098463.

Abstract

A complement fixation (CF) test, a micro-immunofluorescence (micro-IF) test and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using Re-lipopolysaccharide as antigen were compared in the diagnosis of chlamydial infection in 136 mainly elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia during a Chlamydia pneumoniae epidemic in Finland in 1986-1987. Chlamydial pneumonia was diagnosed in 58 (42.6%) of the 136 pneumonia patients; 44 (75.9%) of them could be shown by micro-IF to be caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae, three by Chlamydia psittaci and four by Chlamydia spp. Only 5 (11.4%) of 44 patients with Chlamydia pneumoniae pneumonia were IgM-positive, indicating that the majority of cases were reinfections. In this population of mainly elderly patients the CF test was insensitive, being positive in only 6 (10.3%) of 58 cases of chlamydial pneumonia. The EIA detected 72.4% of cases and micro-IF 87.9% of cases (including infections with Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci and Chlamydia spp.). In the EIA 77% of positive cases were positive in serum samples taken a week apart, whereas the corresponding figure for micro-IF was 50%. In micro-IF the measurement of IgA antibody levels is recommended and IgM-positive sera should be retested after removal of IgG antibody to avoid false-positive findings due to presence of rheumatoid factor. The collection of a third serum sample, for instance one month after onset, is also recommended, since half of the patients showed a diagnostic response in the micro-IF only in the sera taken one month apart.

摘要

1986 - 1987年芬兰肺炎衣原体流行期间,对136例主要为老年的社区获得性肺炎住院患者,比较了以重组脂多糖为抗原的补体结合(CF)试验、微量免疫荧光(微量IF)试验和酶免疫测定(EIA)在衣原体感染诊断中的应用。136例肺炎患者中,58例(42.6%)诊断为衣原体肺炎;其中44例(75.9%)经微量IF证实由肺炎衣原体引起,3例由鹦鹉热衣原体引起,4例由衣原体属引起。44例肺炎衣原体肺炎患者中仅5例(11.4%)IgM阳性,表明大多数病例为再感染。在这个主要为老年患者的群体中,CF试验不敏感,58例衣原体肺炎中仅6例(10.3%)呈阳性。EIA检测出72.4%的病例,微量IF检测出87.9%的病例(包括肺炎衣原体、鹦鹉热衣原体和衣原体属感染)。在EIA中,77%的阳性病例在间隔一周采集的血清样本中呈阳性,而微量IF的相应数字为50%。在微量IF中,建议检测IgA抗体水平,IgM阳性血清应在去除IgG抗体后重新检测,以避免因类风湿因子的存在而出现假阳性结果。还建议采集第三份血清样本,例如发病后一个月的样本,因为一半的患者仅在间隔一个月采集的血清中微量IF呈诊断性反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验