Zwadyk P, Tarlton R A, Proctor A
Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Mar;67(3):269-71. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/67.3.269.
The API 20C reactions were compared with the results of conventional methods for identifying yeasts using 45 strains. There was a 98% (44/45) correlation between the two methods in the identification of the yeasts. Individual fermentation tests ranged from 89 to 100% correlation, with an average agreement of 96.7%. The assimilation tests ranged from 85 to 100% correlation, with an overall agreement of 97.3%. The two methods had 91% agreement for cycloheximide resistance. The results of this limited study indicate that the API 20C may prove to be an acceptable substitute for conventional carbohydrate fermentation and assimilation tests.
将API 20C反应结果与使用45株酵母菌的传统鉴定方法结果进行了比较。两种方法在酵母菌鉴定方面的相关性为98%(44/45)。个体发酵试验的相关性在89%至100%之间,平均一致性为96.7%。同化试验的相关性在85%至100%之间,总体一致性为97.3%。两种方法在对放线菌酮抗性方面的一致性为91%。这项有限研究的结果表明,API 20C可能被证明是传统碳水化合物发酵和同化试验的可接受替代方法。