Schacter D L, Reiman E, Curran T, Yun L S, Bandy D, McDermott K B, Roediger H L
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Neuron. 1996 Aug;17(2):267-74. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80158-0.
Memory distortions and illusions have been thoroughly documented in psychological studies, but little is known about the neuroanatomical correlates of true and false memories. Vivid but illusory memories can be induced by asking people whether they recall or recognize words that were not previously presented, but are semantically related to other previously presented words. We used positron emission tomography to compare brain regions involved in veridical recognition of printed words that were heard several minutes earlier and illusory recognition of printed words that had not been heard earlier. Veridical and illusory recognition were each associated with blood flow increases in a left medial temporal region previously implicated in episodic memory; veridical recognition was distinguished by additional blood flow increases in a left temporoparietal region previously implicated in the retention of auditory/phonological information. This study reveals similarities and differences in the way the brain processes accurate and illusory memories.
记忆扭曲和错觉在心理学研究中已有详尽记录,但对于真实记忆和错误记忆的神经解剖学关联却知之甚少。通过询问人们是否回忆起或认出之前未呈现但在语义上与其他先前呈现的单词相关的单词,可以诱发生动但虚幻的记忆。我们使用正电子发射断层扫描来比较参与对几分钟前听到的印刷单词进行真实识别和对之前未听到的印刷单词进行虚幻识别的脑区。真实识别和虚幻识别均与先前涉及情景记忆的左内侧颞叶区域血流增加有关;真实识别的特征是先前涉及听觉/语音信息保留的左颞顶叶区域有额外的血流增加。这项研究揭示了大脑处理准确记忆和虚幻记忆方式的异同。