Chang K O, Parwani A V, Saif L J
Department of Veterinary Preventitive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, USA.
Arch Virol. 1996;141(9):1727-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01718295.
Characterization of the VP7 (G type) and VP4 (P type) genes of bovine group A rotaviruses (BRV) from field samples was performed using RT-PCR and RFLP analysis. After RT-PCR amplification of the full length VP7 genes and partial length VP4 genes (nucleotides 1 to 1096), four enzymes, EcoRV, NlaIV, BamHI and HpaII were used for digestion analysis. For VP7, four RFLP profiles were observed after analysis of the digests: they were designated as G6, G6s (subtype, showed about 86% nucleotide and 90% amino acid identity to reference G6 strains), G8 and G10. For VP4, three RFLP profiles were observed: designated as P[1], P[5] and P[11]. The G typing analysis of 86 BRV fecal samples from 5 states, representing at least 11 different herds revealed that 60.5% (52/86) were G6, which included G6s (9/52); 19.8% (17/86) were G10; 7% (6/86) were G8; 10.4% (9/86) were G6 and G10 mixtures including two G6s samples; and 2.3% (2/86) were G6 and G6s mixtures. The P typing analysis of the same 86 fecal samples revealed that 64% (55/86) were P[5]; 28% (24/86) were P[11]; 1.2% (1/86) were P[1] and 6 samples (7%) were mixtures of either P[11] or P[5]. When the same samples were analyzed according to G and P type specificity, all possible combinations of G and P types existed in the field. The G6P[5] type was most prevalent and accounted for 46.7% (41/86) of the samples; 12.8% (11/86) were G10P[11]; 7% (6/86) were G10P[5] and an equal number were G6sP[11]. The G6P[11] (n = 2), G8P[1] (n = 1), G8P[5] (n = 1) and G8P[11] (n = 3) combinations were also observed. The following mixed BRV infections were observed in the field samples; G6sP[5 + 11] (n = 1), G8P[5 + 11] (n = 1), G6 + G10P[5] (n = 1) G6 + G10P[5 + 11] (n = 2), G6 + G6sP[11] (n = 1), G6 + G6sP[1 + 11] (n = 1), G6s + G10P[11] (n = 1) and G6s + G10P[5 + 11] (n = 1). Information on the G and P types and G/P combinations in the field samples should be useful for understanding the epidemiology of BRV and designing vaccination strategies to control BRV in the field.
利用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和限制性片段长度多态性分析(RFLP)对来自现场样本的A组牛轮状病毒(BRV)的VP7(G型)和VP4(P型)基因进行了特征分析。在对全长VP7基因和部分长度VP4基因(核苷酸1至1096)进行RT-PCR扩增后,使用四种酶,即EcoRV、NlaIV、BamHI和HpaII进行消化分析。对于VP7,分析消化产物后观察到四种RFLP图谱:它们被指定为G6、G6s(亚型,与参考G6毒株显示约86%的核苷酸和90%的氨基酸同一性)、G8和G10。对于VP4,观察到三种RFLP图谱:指定为P[1]、P[5]和P[11]。对来自5个州的86份BRV粪便样本进行G分型分析,这些样本代表至少11个不同的牛群,结果显示60.5%(52/86)为G6,其中包括G6s(9/52);19.8%(17/86)为G10;7%(6/86)为G8;10.4%(9/86)为G6和G10混合物,包括两份G6s样本;2.3%(2/86)为G6和G6s混合物。对相同的86份粪便样本进行P分型分析,结果显示64%(55/86)为P[5];28%(24/86)为P[11];1.2%(1/86)为P[1],6份样本(7%)为P[11]或P[5]的混合物。当根据G和P型特异性对相同样本进行分析时,现场存在所有可能的G和P型组合。G6P[5]型最为普遍,占样本的46.7%(41/86);12.8%(11/86)为G10P[11];7%(6/86)为G10P[5],数量相同的为G6sP[11]。还观察到G6P[11](n = 2)、G8P[1](n = 1)、G8P[5](n = 1)和G8P[11](n = 3)组合。在现场样本中观察到以下混合BRV感染;G6sP[5 + 11](n = 1)、G8P[5 + 11](n = 1)、G6 + G10P[5](n = 1)、G6 + G10P[5 + 11](n = 2)、G6 + G6sP[11](n = 1)、G6 + G6sP[1 + 11](n = 1)、G6s + G10P[11](n = 1)和G6s + G10P[5 + 11](n = 1)。现场样本中关于G和P型以及G/P组合的信息对于了解BRV的流行病学和设计控制现场BRV的疫苗接种策略应该是有用的。