Wo J M, Hunter J G, Waring J P
Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Nov;42(11):2222-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018802330957.
Ambulatory pH monitoring of the distal esophagus is the most accurate diagnostic study for patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The measurement of proximal esophageal acid exposure time may be useful in patients with atypical reflux symptoms. The aim of this study is to evaluate if proximal esophageal pH monitoring provides useful information beyond that learned with distal esophageal pH monitoring. We routinely performed dual-channel pH monitoring with pH electrodes positioned at 20 and 5 cm above the manometric lower esophageal sphincter from January 1992 to August 1995. All patients scored their esophageal symptoms from zero (none) to four (severe). We compared proximal esophageal reflux (PR) in patients with typical symptoms (i.e., heartburn, regurgitation) and in patients with atypical symptoms (i.e., chest pain, cough, hoarseness, and asthma). We compared symptom profiles between patients with and without PR. We reviewed our experience in patients with abnormal PR, but with a normal amount of distal esophageal reflux (DR). We studied 441 consecutive patients. There were no significant differences in PR between patients with typical and atypical symptoms. There were no differences in symptom profiles between patients with normal and abnormal PR. There were no differences of PR between the different atypical symptoms. PR did not correlate with the severity of the patient's symptoms. PR correlated well only with DR. Twenty-four patients had isolated abnormal PR, but only six patients improved with antireflux therapy. We conclude that routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring of the proximal esophagus appears to be of little value. The decision to offer patients an empiric trial of antireflux therapy for suspected GERD should not be based on the presence or absence of PR.
动态监测食管远端pH值是疑似胃食管反流病(GERD)患者最准确的诊断性检查。测量食管近端酸暴露时间可能对有非典型反流症状的患者有用。本研究的目的是评估食管近端pH监测是否能提供超出食管远端pH监测所获信息的有用信息。1992年1月至1995年8月,我们常规使用pH电极在测压的食管下括约肌上方20厘米和5厘米处进行双通道pH监测。所有患者对其食管症状从0分(无)至4分(严重)进行评分。我们比较了有典型症状(即烧心、反流)的患者和有非典型症状(即胸痛、咳嗽、声音嘶哑和哮喘)的患者的食管近端反流(PR)情况。我们比较了有和没有PR的患者之间症状特征。我们回顾了PR异常但食管远端反流(DR)量正常的患者的情况。我们研究了441例连续患者。有典型症状和非典型症状的患者之间PR无显著差异。PR正常和异常的患者之间症状特征无差异。不同非典型症状之间PR无差异。PR与患者症状的严重程度无关。PR仅与DR密切相关。24例患者有孤立的异常PR,但只有6例患者抗反流治疗后症状改善。我们得出结论,常规动态监测食管近端pH值似乎价值不大。对于疑似GERD患者,决定给予抗反流治疗经验性试验不应基于PR的有无。