• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)物质使用部分的结构、内容及可靠性

Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance use sections.

作者信息

Lachner G, Wittchen H U, Perkonigg A, Holly A, Schuster P, Wunderlich U, Türk D, Garczynski E, Pfister H

机构信息

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology Unit, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Addict Res. 1998 Mar;4(1-2):28-41. doi: 10.1159/000018922.

DOI:10.1159/000018922
PMID:9740815
Abstract

After reviewing currently available diagnostic assessment instruments for substance use disorders this paper describes the format and structure of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance disorder section. In addition, the test-retest reliability of diagnoses and criteria for nicotine, alcohol, illegal and prescription drugs, is reported. Findings obtained in community sample of adolescents and young adults indicate that the substance section is acceptable for almost all types of respondents, efficient in terms of time and ease of administration as well as reliable in terms of consistency of findings over time. The test-retest reliability over a period of an average of 1 month, as examined by two independent interviewers indicates good-to-excellent kappa values for all substance disorders assessed, with significant kappa values ranging between 0.55 for drug abuse and 0.83 for alcohol abuse. There was also fairly consistently high agreement for the assessment of single DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for abuse and dependence as well as the M-CIDI quantity-frequency and time-related questions. To conclude, although - unlike previous studies - this study was conducted in a community sample and not in patients and used considerably longer time intervals of more than a month between investigations, our M-CIDI reliability findings are at least as high as those from previous studies.

摘要

在回顾了目前可用的物质使用障碍诊断评估工具后,本文描述了慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)物质障碍部分的形式和结构。此外,还报告了尼古丁、酒精、非法药物和处方药诊断及标准的重测信度。在青少年和青年社区样本中获得的结果表明,物质部分几乎对所有类型的受访者都是可接受的,在时间和管理便利性方面是有效的,并且在一段时间内调查结果的一致性方面是可靠的。由两名独立访谈者进行检查,平均1个月期间的重测信度表明,所有评估的物质障碍的kappa值良好至优秀,药物滥用的显著kappa值在0.55之间,酒精滥用的kappa值在0.83之间。对于滥用和依赖的单一DSM-IV诊断标准以及M-CIDI数量-频率和时间相关问题的评估,也存在相当一致的高度一致性。总之,尽管与以往研究不同,本研究是在社区样本而非患者中进行的,并且在两次调查之间使用了超过一个月的长得多的时间间隔,但我们的M-CIDI信度研究结果至少与以往研究一样高。

相似文献

1
Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance use sections.慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)物质使用部分的结构、内容及可靠性
Eur Addict Res. 1998 Mar;4(1-2):28-41. doi: 10.1159/000018922.
2
WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results.世界卫生组织关于酒精和药物使用障碍工具的信效度研究:方法与结果概述
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):161-9. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00087-2.
3
Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI).慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)计算机化DSM-IV版本的重测信度。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;33(11):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s001270050095.
4
Operationalization of alcohol and drug dependence criteria by means of a structured interview.通过结构化访谈对酒精和药物依赖标准进行操作化。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1990;8:69-83.
5
Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study.酒精与药物诊断的疾病分类比较:一项多地点、多工具的国际研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):217-26. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00092-6.
6
Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM): reliability for substance abusers.物质与精神障碍的精神病学研究访谈(PRISM):对药物滥用者的信度
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Sep;153(9):1195-201. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.9.1195.
7
Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN.通过酒精与药物使用障碍诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)酒精和药物使用障碍标准及诊断结果的一致性,由酒精与药物使用障碍诊断访谈表-酒精相关障碍版(AUDADIS-ADR)、复合国际诊断访谈表(CIDI)和神经精神疾病临床评定量表(SCAN)进行测量。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00090-2.
8
Inter-rater reliability of the SCID alcohol and substance use disorders section among adolescents.青少年中SCID酒精与物质使用障碍部分的评分者间信度。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 May 1;59(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00119-2.
9
Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule--Alcohol/Drug-Revised (AUDADIS-ADR): an international comparison.酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈表——酒精/药物修订版(AUDADIS-ADR)中酒精与药物模块的信度:一项国际比较
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):171-85. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00088-4.
10
Concordance between ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN: results of a cross-national study.通过酒精使用障碍与药物使用障碍诊断访谈日程表-药物滥用修订版(AUDADIS-ADR)、复合性国际诊断交谈检查表(CIDI)和神经精神病学临床评定表(SCAN)所测量的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)酒精和药物使用障碍标准与诊断之间的一致性:一项跨国研究的结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00091-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Interactions Between Psychotic Symptoms, Cognition, and Environmental Risk Factors: A Bayesian Analysis of Networks.探索精神病症状、认知与环境风险因素之间的相互作用:网络的贝叶斯分析
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):1134-1145. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae174.
2
Estimating the prevalence of alcohol-related disorders and treatment utilization in Bremen 2016/2017 through routine data linkage.通过常规数据关联估算2016/2017年不来梅市酒精相关障碍的患病率及治疗利用率。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 26;14:1002526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1002526. eCollection 2023.
3
Subtypes in Patients Taking Prescribed Opioid Analgesics and Their Characteristics: A Latent Class Analysis.
服用处方阿片类镇痛药患者的亚型及其特征:潜在类别分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 8;13:918371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.918371. eCollection 2022.
4
Abuse of Non-opioid Analgesics in Germany: Prevalence and Associations Among Self-Medicated Users.德国非阿片类镇痛药的滥用:自我用药者中的患病率及关联
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:864389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.864389. eCollection 2022.
5
Estimating the number of children in households with substance use disorders in Germany.估算德国有物质使用障碍家庭中的儿童数量。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Nov 6;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00415-0.
6
Alcohol abstinence and mortality in a general population sample of adults in Germany: A cohort study.德国成年人一般人群样本中戒酒与死亡率:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Nov 2;18(11):e1003819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003819. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Comparing Cannabis Use Disorder in the General Population with Cannabis Treatment Seekers Using Multi-Source National Datasets: Who Receives Treatment?比较使用多源国家数据集的一般人群中的大麻使用障碍与寻求大麻治疗者:谁接受治疗?
Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(2):103-112. doi: 10.1159/000518648. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
8
Relationships between patterns of cannabis use, abuse and dependence and recent stimulant use: Evidence from two national surveys in Ireland.大麻使用、滥用和依赖模式与近期兴奋剂使用之间的关系:来自爱尔兰两项全国性调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 9;16(8):e0255745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255745. eCollection 2021.
9
Relationships between age at first substance use and persistence of cannabis use and cannabis use disorder.首次使用物质的年龄与大麻使用及大麻使用障碍的持续存在之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 27;21(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11023-0.
10
Correlates of patterns of cannabis use, abuse and dependence: evidence from two national surveys in Ireland.大麻使用、滥用和依赖模式的相关因素:来自爱尔兰两项全国性调查的证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):441-447. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab007.