Lachner G, Wittchen H U, Perkonigg A, Holly A, Schuster P, Wunderlich U, Türk D, Garczynski E, Pfister H
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology Unit, Munich, Germany.
Eur Addict Res. 1998 Mar;4(1-2):28-41. doi: 10.1159/000018922.
After reviewing currently available diagnostic assessment instruments for substance use disorders this paper describes the format and structure of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance disorder section. In addition, the test-retest reliability of diagnoses and criteria for nicotine, alcohol, illegal and prescription drugs, is reported. Findings obtained in community sample of adolescents and young adults indicate that the substance section is acceptable for almost all types of respondents, efficient in terms of time and ease of administration as well as reliable in terms of consistency of findings over time. The test-retest reliability over a period of an average of 1 month, as examined by two independent interviewers indicates good-to-excellent kappa values for all substance disorders assessed, with significant kappa values ranging between 0.55 for drug abuse and 0.83 for alcohol abuse. There was also fairly consistently high agreement for the assessment of single DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for abuse and dependence as well as the M-CIDI quantity-frequency and time-related questions. To conclude, although - unlike previous studies - this study was conducted in a community sample and not in patients and used considerably longer time intervals of more than a month between investigations, our M-CIDI reliability findings are at least as high as those from previous studies.
在回顾了目前可用的物质使用障碍诊断评估工具后,本文描述了慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)物质障碍部分的形式和结构。此外,还报告了尼古丁、酒精、非法药物和处方药诊断及标准的重测信度。在青少年和青年社区样本中获得的结果表明,物质部分几乎对所有类型的受访者都是可接受的,在时间和管理便利性方面是有效的,并且在一段时间内调查结果的一致性方面是可靠的。由两名独立访谈者进行检查,平均1个月期间的重测信度表明,所有评估的物质障碍的kappa值良好至优秀,药物滥用的显著kappa值在0.55之间,酒精滥用的kappa值在0.83之间。对于滥用和依赖的单一DSM-IV诊断标准以及M-CIDI数量-频率和时间相关问题的评估,也存在相当一致的高度一致性。总之,尽管与以往研究不同,本研究是在社区样本而非患者中进行的,并且在两次调查之间使用了超过一个月的长得多的时间间隔,但我们的M-CIDI信度研究结果至少与以往研究一样高。