Suppr超能文献

肾移植可及性方面的种族差异——是临床合理的,还是因使用不足或过度使用所致?

Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

作者信息

Epstein A M, Ayanian J Z, Keogh J H, Noonan S J, Armistead N, Cleary P D, Weissman J S, David-Kasdan J A, Carlson D, Fuller J, Marsh D, Conti R M

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1537-44, 2 p preceding 1537. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432106.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite abundant evidence of racial disparities in the use of surgical procedures, it is uncertain whether these disparities reflect racial differences in clinical appropriateness or overuse or underuse of inappropriate care.

METHODS

We performed a literature review and used an expert panel to develop criteria for determining the appropriateness of renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease. Using data from five states and the District of Columbia on patients who had started to undergo dialysis in 1996 or 1997, we selected a random sample of 1518 patients (age range, 18 to 54 years), stratified according to race and sex. We classified the appropriateness of patients as data on candidates for transplantation and analyzed rates of referral to a transplantation center for evaluation, placement on a waiting list, and receipt of a transplant according to race.

RESULTS

Black patients were less likely than white patients to be rated as appropriate candidates for transplantation according to appropriateness criteria based on expert opinion (71 blacks [9.0 percent] vs. 152 whites [20.9 percent]) and were more likely to have had incomplete evaluations (368 [46.5 percent] vs. 282 [38.8 percent], P<0.001 for the overall chi-square). Among patients considered to be appropriate candidates for transplantation, blacks were less likely than whites to be referred for evaluation, according to the chart review (90.1 percent vs. 98.0 percent, P=0.008), to be placed on a waiting list (71.0 percent vs. 86.7 percent, P=0.007), or to undergo transplantation (16.9 percent vs. 52.0 percent, P<0.001). Among patients classified as inappropriate candidates, whites were more likely than blacks to be referred for evaluation (57.8 percent vs. 38.4 percent), to be placed on a waiting list (30.9 percent vs. 17.4 percent), and to undergo transplantation (10.3 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P<0.001 for all three comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in rates of renal transplantation stem from differences in clinical characteristics that affect appropriateness as well as from underuse of transplantation among blacks and overuse among whites. Reducing racial disparities will require efforts to distinguish their specific causes and the development of interventions tailored to address them.

摘要

背景

尽管有大量证据表明在外科手术的使用上存在种族差异,但尚不确定这些差异反映的是临床适宜性方面的种族差异,还是不适当治疗的过度使用或使用不足。

方法

我们进行了文献综述,并利用一个专家小组制定了确定终末期肾病患者肾移植适宜性的标准。利用来自五个州和哥伦比亚特区的1996年或1997年开始接受透析的患者的数据,我们随机抽取了1518名患者(年龄范围为18至54岁),并按种族和性别进行分层。我们根据移植候选人的数据将患者的适宜性进行分类,并分析了按种族转诊至移植中心进行评估、列入等待名单以及接受移植的比例。

结果

根据基于专家意见的适宜性标准,黑人患者被评为适宜移植候选人的可能性低于白人患者(71名黑人[9.0%]对152名白人[20.9%]),并且更有可能接受了不完整的评估(368名[46.5%]对282名[38.8%],总体卡方检验P<0.001)。根据病历审查,在被认为是适宜移植候选人的患者中,黑人患者被转诊进行评估的可能性低于白人患者(90.1%对98.0%,P=0.008),被列入等待名单的可能性低于白人患者(71.0%对86.7%,P=0.007),接受移植的可能性也低于白人患者(16.9%对52.0%,P<0.001)。在被分类为不适宜候选人的患者中,白人患者被转诊进行评估的可能性高于黑人患者(57.8%对38.4%),被列入等待名单的可能性高于黑人患者(30.9%对17.4%),接受移植的可能性也高于黑人患者(10.3%对2.2%,所有三项比较P<0.001)。

结论

肾移植率方面的种族差异源于影响适宜性的临床特征差异,以及黑人中移植使用不足和白人中移植过度使用的情况。减少种族差异需要努力区分其具体原因,并制定针对性的干预措施来解决这些问题。

相似文献

5
Effect of education on racial disparities in access to kidney transplantation.教育对肾脏移植机会种族差异的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01390.x. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
10
Must health literacy be a prerequisite for kidney transplantation?健康素养必须是肾移植的一个先决条件吗?
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;4(1):16-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05781108. Epub 2009 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

8

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验