• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个鼓励使用楼梯的工作场所干预模块:结果与评估问题

A worksite intervention module encouraging the use of stairs: results and evaluation issues.

作者信息

Titze S, Martin B W, Seiler R, Marti B

机构信息

Institute of Sport Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz.

出版信息

Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01318794.

DOI:10.1007/BF01318794
PMID:11320909
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent recommendations suggest that health benefits can also be derived from regular daily activities of moderate intensity which accelerate breathing, such as climbing stairs. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an intervention programme on behaviour change in stair use in a working environment.

METHODS

Intervention field workers were instructed to offer attractive or pull actions. 338 employees of four offices of the Swiss federal government were involved in the evaluation. Two methods were used to assess stair and lift use both before and after the four month intervention period: a non-covered personal observation and an automatic measurement.

RESULTS

Taking all four offices together, a significant increase in stair use, from 61.8% to 67.1% (p = 0.028), was found between the baseline and the follow-up observation. The automatic measurement during observation time reveals a change in stair use from 68.8% to 71.4% (p = 0.268). The pattern of stair use examined for 24 hours by automatic means, however, was not so consistent. Due to the proportion of stair use in each office it is assumed that environmental factors influences the behaviour. The highest percentage of stair use at baseline (86.2%) was identified in an office with a bright stairwell and a small number of steps between floors. The lowest proportion (31.4%) was observed in an office with a dark stairwell, a large number of steps between floors and a stairwell accessible only with a key.

CONCLUSIONS

However, our findings indicate that intervention with "rewarding" elements encourage individuals to use stairs.

摘要

目的

最近的建议表明,日常进行适度强度的活动,如爬楼梯,加快呼吸,也能带来健康益处。本研究的目的是检验一项干预计划对工作环境中楼梯使用行为改变的影响。

方法

干预现场工作人员被指示提供有吸引力的或推动性的行动。瑞士联邦政府四个办公室的338名员工参与了评估。在为期四个月的干预期前后,使用两种方法评估楼梯和电梯的使用情况:无遮盖的个人观察和自动测量。

结果

综合四个办公室来看,在基线观察和随访观察之间,楼梯使用率显著提高,从61.8%提高到67.1%(p = 0.028)。观察期间的自动测量结果显示,楼梯使用率从68.8%变为71.4%(p = 0.268)。然而,通过自动方式对楼梯使用情况进行24小时的监测,结果并不那么一致。由于每个办公室的楼梯使用率不同,推测环境因素会影响行为。在一个楼梯间明亮且楼层间步数较少的办公室,基线时楼梯使用率最高(86.2%)。在一个楼梯间昏暗、楼层间步数较多且只有用钥匙才能进入楼梯间的办公室,楼梯使用率最低(31.4%)。

结论

然而,我们的研究结果表明,带有“奖励”元素的干预措施会鼓励人们使用楼梯。

相似文献

1
A worksite intervention module encouraging the use of stairs: results and evaluation issues.一个鼓励使用楼梯的工作场所干预模块:结果与评估问题
Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01318794.
2
Increasing stair use in an office worksite through an interactive environmental intervention.通过互动式环境干预增加办公场所的楼梯使用。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 May-Jun;27(5):323-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120221-QUAN-104. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Does a video displaying a stair climbing model increase stair use in a worksite setting?视频展示爬楼梯模型能否增加工作场所的楼梯使用?
Public Health. 2017 Aug;149:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Worksite interventions to increase stair climbing; reasons for caution.增加爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施;谨慎行事的原因。
Prev Med. 2006 Jul;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 3.
5
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.
6
A multistage controlled intervention to increase stair climbing at work: effectiveness and process evaluation.一项旨在增加工作场所爬楼梯行为的多阶段对照干预措施:效果与过程评估
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 11;13:47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0371-0.
7
A Multicomponent Intervention to Encourage Stair Use in Municipal Buildings.鼓励在市政建筑中使用楼梯的多组分干预措施。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):57-69. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776893. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Associations between building design, point-of-decision stair prompts, and stair use in urban worksites.建筑设计、决策点楼梯提示与城市工作场所楼梯使用之间的关联。
Prev Med. 2014 Mar;60:60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.006. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
9
Measuring stair use in two office buildings: a comparison between an objective and a self-reported method.测量两栋办公楼中的楼梯使用情况:客观方法与自我报告方法的比较。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Apr;17(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00533.x.
10
A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue- and white-collar worksites.一种基于海报的干预措施,用于促进蓝领和白领工作场所的楼梯使用。
Prev Med. 2007 Aug-Sep;45(2-3):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Nudging Hospital Visitors Towards Stair Use, in Greece.引导希腊医院访客使用楼梯
J Prev (2022). 2025 Apr;46(2):189-199. doi: 10.1007/s10935-025-00827-0. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
Applying a deterrence nudge strategy for promoting stair usage in a university setting.应用威慑推动策略促进大学环境中楼梯的使用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):2195. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19592-6.
3
Choosing between stairs and escalators in China: The impact of location, height and pedestrian volume.在中国,选择楼梯还是自动扶梯:位置、高度和行人流量的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity.每日步行和骑自行车上班:它们作为促进健康的身体活动的效用。
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Apr;33(1 Suppl):S87-94. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00013-5.
2
Longitudinal shifts in employees' stages and processes of exercise behavior change.员工运动行为改变阶段和过程的纵向变化。
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jan-Feb;10(3):195-200. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.3.195.
3
Benefits of lifestyle activity vs structured exercise.生活方式活动与结构化锻炼的益处。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Jun 10;2:529-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.06.005. eCollection 2015.
4
The predictive validity and effects of using the transtheoretical model to increase the physical activity of healthcare workers in a public hospital in South Africa.在南非一家公立医院使用跨理论模型提高医护人员身体活动水平的预测效度及效果
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):384-391. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0136-5. Epub 2012 May 31.
5
Worksite physical activity interventions and obesity: a review of European studies (the HOPE project).工作场所体力活动干预与肥胖:对欧洲研究的综述(HOPE 项目)。
Obes Facts. 2011;4(6):479-88. doi: 10.1159/000335255. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
Changing behavioral patterns to promote physical activity with motivational signs.改变行为模式,通过激励标志促进身体活动。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2009 Jan;14(1):20-5. doi: 10.1007/s12199-008-0053-x. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
7
Pausa para tu Salud: reduction of weight and waistlines by integrating exercise breaks into workplace organizational routine.为健康暂停:通过将运动休息融入工作场所的日常组织安排来减轻体重和减小腰围。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A12. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
JAMA. 1999 Jan 27;281(4):375-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.4.375.
4
Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial.增加身体活动和心肺适能的生活方式干预与结构化干预的比较:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 1999 Jan 27;281(4):327-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.4.327.
5
[Exercise and sports: an undervalued health resource].[运动与体育:一种被低估的健康资源]
Ther Umsch. 1998 Apr;55(4):221-8.
6
What is the optimal type of physical activity to enhance health?为促进健康,最佳的体育活动类型是什么?
Br J Sports Med. 1997 Dec;31(4):277-84. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.4.277.
7
Exercise intensity and longevity in men. The Harvard Alumni Health Study.男性的运动强度与寿命。哈佛校友健康研究。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1179-84.
8
Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men.体能变化与全因死亡率。一项针对健康和不健康男性的前瞻性研究。
JAMA. 1995 Apr 12;273(14):1093-8.
9
Health promotion by encouraged use of stairs.通过鼓励使用楼梯来促进健康。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):289-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.289.
10
Evaluation and modification of exercise patterns in the natural environment.自然环境中运动模式的评估与调整。
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Dec;137(12):1540-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.12.1540.