Facklam Richard
Streptococcus Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Oct;15(4):613-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.613-630.2002.
Since the division of the Streptococcus genus into enterococci, lactococci, and streptococci in 1984, many changes in the nomenclature and taxonomy of the Streptococcus genus have taken place. The application of genetic comparisons has improved the proper classification of the different species. The Lancefield system of serogrouping the streptococci by the expression of beta-hemolysis on blood agar plates is still very useful for the identification of streptococci for patient management. The Lancefield grouping system cannot be used in itself for accurate identification of specific beta-hemolytic species, but it can be a useful part of the identification procedure. Except for identification of the "Streptococcus bovis group" of species and Streptococcus suis, Lancefield grouping is of little value in identification of the non-beta-hemolytic streptococci and related genera. In fact, identification of the non-beta-hemolytic species is problematic for conventional as well as commercially available identification procedures. A combination of conventional tests and specific chromogenic tests suggested by several investigators is presented and discussed. Tables are included that suggest tests and procedures to guide investigators attempting to identify all the species.
自1984年链球菌属被分为肠球菌属、乳球菌属和链球菌属以来,链球菌属的命名和分类发生了许多变化。基因比较的应用改进了不同物种的正确分类。通过在血琼脂平板上β溶血的表达对链球菌进行血清群分组的兰斯菲尔德系统,对于识别用于患者管理的链球菌仍然非常有用。兰斯菲尔德分组系统本身不能用于准确识别特定的β溶血物种,但它可以是识别过程中的一个有用部分。除了对“牛链球菌群”物种和猪链球菌的识别外,兰斯菲尔德分组在非β溶血链球菌和相关属的识别中价值不大。事实上,对于传统的以及市售的识别程序来说,非β溶血物种的识别都存在问题。本文介绍并讨论了几位研究者提出的传统试验和特定显色试验的组合。文中还列出了表格,给出了指导研究者尝试识别所有物种的试验和程序。