Marsh David R, Sadruddin Salim, Fikree Fariyal F, Krishnan Chitra, Darmstadt Gary L
Office of Health, Save the Children Federation/US, Westport, CT, USA.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;17(2):132-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00475.x.
Verbal autopsy (VA) aims to estimate a community's mortality experience in the absence of contact with formal registration or health care systems. Application of VA to neonatal deaths is problematic as the agonal phase of a neonatal death tends to be indistinct. This is the first attempt to validate the technique exclusively on newborns who died. Seriously ill neonates (n = 137) were enrolled from the Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, between 31 October 1993 and 31 July 1994. All died as newborns, and caregivers were interviewed at home 3-230 days later. Surveillance physicians completed case questionnaires in the hospital, and investigator physicians assigned the main and associated causes of death using clinical criteria. Field questionnaires including a verbatim open-ended history, and syndrome modules were completed by a field worker, and investigator physicians again assigned the main and associated causes of death based on three diagnostic methods: verbatim alone, modules alone and verbatim and modules combined. We assessed the validity of VA by comparing field against hospital diagnoses by diagnostic (verbatim vs. modules vs. both) and analytic method (main vs. any diagnosis). VA identified at least one diagnosis accurately in 71% of the newborns. VA underdiagnosed low birthweight and prematurity in the field. Verbatim and modules diagnostic method comparing any field against main hospital diagnoses revealed high sensitivities for too early/too small syndrome (90%) and neonatal tetanus (84%). VA correctly identified some important causes of neonatal death in the field. Assigning multiple diagnoses using both open- and closed-ended questions increases the likelihood of correct ascertainment.
口头尸检(VA)旨在估计在未与正式登记或医疗系统接触的情况下社区的死亡情况。将VA应用于新生儿死亡存在问题,因为新生儿死亡的濒死期往往不明显。这是首次专门针对死亡新生儿对该技术进行验证的尝试。1993年10月31日至1994年7月31日期间,从巴基斯坦卡拉奇市民医院招募了137名重症新生儿。所有新生儿均在出生时死亡,3至230天后在家中对其照顾者进行了访谈。监测医生在医院完成病例问卷,调查医生根据临床标准确定主要和相关死因。包括逐字记录的开放式病史和综合征模块的现场问卷由一名现场工作人员完成,调查医生再次根据三种诊断方法确定主要和相关死因:仅逐字记录、仅模块以及逐字记录和模块相结合。我们通过按诊断方法(逐字记录与模块与两者结合)和分析方法(主要诊断与任何诊断)比较现场诊断与医院诊断来评估VA的有效性。VA在71%的新生儿中准确识别出至少一种诊断。VA在现场对低出生体重和早产诊断不足。将任何现场诊断与主要医院诊断进行比较的逐字记录和模块诊断方法显示,对过早/过小综合征(90%)和新生儿破伤风(84%)具有较高的敏感性。VA在现场正确识别出一些新生儿死亡的重要原因。使用开放式和封闭式问题进行多重诊断增加了正确确定死因的可能性。