Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT.
J Athl Train. 2002 Jul;37(3):293-9.
To present the frequency resonance hypothesis, a possible mechanical mechanism by which treatment with non-thermal levels of ultrasound stimulates therapeutic effects. The review encompasses a 4-decade history but focuses on recent reports describing the effects of nonthermal therapeutic levels of ultrasound at the cellular and molecular levels.
A search of MEDLINE from 1965 through 2000 using the terms ultrasound and therapeutic ultrasound.
The literature provides a number of examples in which exposure of cells to therapeutic ultrasound under nonthermal conditions modified cellular functions. Nonthermal levels of ultrasound are reported to modulate membrane properties, alter cellular proliferation, and produce increases in proteins associated with inflammation and injury repair. Combined, these data suggest that nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound can modify the inflammatory response.
The concept of the absorption of ultrasonic energy by enzymatic proteins leading to changes in the enzymes activity is not novel. However, recent reports demonstrating that ultrasound affects enzyme activity and possibly gene regulation provide sufficient data to present a probable molecular mechanism of ultrasound's nonthermal therapeutic action. The frequency resonance hypothesis describes 2 possible biological mechanisms that may alter protein function as a result of the absorption of ultrasonic energy. First, absorption of mechanical energy by a protein may produce a transient conformational shift (modifying the 3-dimensional structure) and alter the protein's functional activity. Second, the resonance or shearing properties of the wave (or both) may dissociate a multimolecular complex, thereby disrupting the complex's function. This review focuses on recent studies that have reported cellular and molecular effects of therapeutic ultrasound and presents a mechanical mechanism that may lead to a better understanding of how the nonthermal effects of ultrasound may be therapeutic. Moreover, a better understanding of ultrasound's mechanical mechanism could lead to a better understanding of how and when ultrasound should be employed as a therapeutic modality.
提出频率共振假说,这是一种可能的力学机制,解释非热水平的超声波如何刺激治疗效果。该综述涵盖了 40 年的历史,但重点是最近描述非热治疗水平超声在细胞和分子水平上的影响的报告。
使用术语“超声”和“治疗性超声”,在 1965 年至 2000 年期间对 MEDLINE 进行搜索。
文献提供了许多例子,表明在非热条件下,细胞暴露于治疗性超声会改变细胞功能。据报道,非热水平的超声可调节膜特性、改变细胞增殖,并增加与炎症和损伤修复相关的蛋白质。综合这些数据表明,治疗性超声的非热效应可以调节炎症反应。
超声能量被酶蛋白吸收导致酶活性改变的概念并不新鲜。然而,最近的报告表明,超声影响酶活性,可能影响基因调控,为提出超声非热治疗作用的可能分子机制提供了充分的数据。频率共振假说描述了 2 种可能的生物学机制,这些机制可能导致蛋白质功能因超声能量的吸收而改变。首先,蛋白质吸收机械能可能产生瞬时构象转移(改变三维结构)并改变蛋白质的功能活性。其次,波的共振或剪切特性(或两者兼而有之)可能使多分子复合物解离,从而破坏复合物的功能。本综述重点关注最近报道的治疗性超声对细胞和分子的影响的研究,并提出了一种力学机制,这可能有助于更好地理解超声的非热效应如何具有治疗作用。此外,对超声力学机制的更好理解可能有助于更好地理解何时以及如何将超声用作治疗方式。