• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间修正混杂因素

Time-modified confounding.

作者信息

Platt Robert W, Schisterman Enrique F, Cole Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, McGillUniversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Sep 15;170(6):687-94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp175. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwp175
PMID:19675141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2800260/
Abstract

According to the authors, time-modified confounding occurs when the causal relation between a time-fixed or time-varying confounder and the treatment or outcome changes over time. A key difference between previously described time-varying confounding and the proposed time-modified confounding is that, in the former, the values of the confounding variable change over time while, in the latter, the effects of the confounder change over time. Using marginal structural models, the authors propose an approach to account for time-modified confounding when the relation between the confounder and treatment is modified over time. An illustrative example and simulation show that, when time-modified confounding is present, a marginal structural model with inverse probability-of-treatment weights specified to account for time-modified confounding remains approximately unbiased with appropriate confidence limit coverage, while models that do not account for time-modified confounding are biased. Correct specification of the treatment model, including accounting for potential variation over time in confounding, is an important assumption of marginal structural models. When the effect of confounders on either the treatment or outcome changes over time, time-modified confounding should be considered.

摘要

据作者称,当固定时间或随时间变化的混杂因素与治疗或结局之间的因果关系随时间变化时,就会出现时间修正混杂。先前描述的随时间变化的混杂与提出的时间修正混杂之间的一个关键区别在于,在前者中,混杂变量的值随时间变化,而在后者中,混杂因素的效应随时间变化。作者使用边际结构模型,提出了一种在混杂因素与治疗之间的关系随时间修正时考虑时间修正混杂的方法。一个说明性示例和模拟表明,当存在时间修正混杂时,为考虑时间修正混杂而指定治疗权重的逆概率的边际结构模型在适当的置信区间覆盖下仍大致无偏,而未考虑时间修正混杂的模型则存在偏差。正确设定治疗模型,包括考虑混杂因素随时间的潜在变化,是边际结构模型的一个重要假设。当混杂因素对治疗或结局的效应随时间变化时,应考虑时间修正混杂。

相似文献

1
Time-modified confounding.时间修正混杂因素
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Sep 15;170(6):687-94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp175. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
2
Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.双重差分法中的混杂因素和回归调整。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):932-941. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13666. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.通过对混杂因素-结局关系的信息先验进行调整,以消除未测量的混杂。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0634-3.
4
Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research.在流行病学研究中对连续混杂因素进行控制。
Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):429-34.
5
The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.从因果关系图的角度看,逻辑回归模型中混杂等价性的令人震惊的问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0449-7.
6
Misspecification of confounder-exposure and confounder-outcome associations leads to bias in effect estimates.混杂因素-暴露和混杂因素-结局关联的错误指定会导致效应估计偏倚。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01817-0.
7
A simulation study of finite-sample properties of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models.边缘结构 Cox 比例风险模型有限样本性质的仿真研究。
Stat Med. 2012 Aug 30;31(19):2098-109. doi: 10.1002/sim.5317. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
Adjusting for time-varying confounders in survival analysis using structural nested cumulative survival time models.使用结构嵌套累积生存时间模型在生存分析中对随时间变化的混杂因素进行调整。
Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):472-483. doi: 10.1111/biom.13158. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
9
Model specification and unmeasured confounders in partially ecologic analyses based on group proportions of exposed.基于暴露组比例的部分生态学分析中的模型设定与未测量混杂因素
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Jun;31(3):184-90. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.868.
10
A comparison of methods to estimate the hazard ratio under conditions of time-varying confounding and nonpositivity.在时变混杂和非正定性条件下估计风险比的方法比较。
Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):718-23. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31822549e8.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There a Relationship Between Grip Strength and Injuries in Professional Baseball Players? Letter to the Editor.职业棒球运动员的握力与伤病之间存在关联吗?致编辑的信。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 30;13(6):23259671251342815. doi: 10.1177/23259671251342815. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Estimating the causal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 spread in seven EU countries via machine learning.通过机器学习评估非药物干预措施对七个欧盟国家新冠疫情传播的因果影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2.
3
An optimal antibiotic selection framework for Sepsis patients using Artificial Intelligence.一种使用人工智能的脓毒症患者最佳抗生素选择框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):343. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01350-y.
4
Detecting signatures of consciousness in acute brain injury after stimulation with apomorphine and methylphenidate: protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study.检测阿扑吗啡和哌醋甲酯刺激后急性脑损伤中的意识特征:一项安慰剂对照、随机、交叉研究方案
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Jan 10;6(1):e000584. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000584. eCollection 2024.
5
A formal causal interpretation of the case-crossover design.病例交叉设计的一种形式因果解释。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):1330-1343. doi: 10.1111/biom.13749. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Common Methods for Handling Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: What Works and Why.边缘结构模型中缺失数据处理的常用方法:什么方法有效,为什么有效。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 6;190(4):663-672. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa225.
7
Improving outcomes for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation: Science of the times.提高循环死亡后肾移植的效果:时代的科学。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236662. eCollection 2020.
8
Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances.卫生技术评估中的倾向得分方法:原理、扩展应用及最新进展
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 18;10:973. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00973. eCollection 2019.
9
Daring to draw causal claims from non-randomized studies of primary care interventions.敢于从初级保健干预措施的非随机研究中得出因果关系结论。
Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):639-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy005.
10
Impact of left atrial appendage closure on cardiac functional and structural remodeling: A difference-in-difference analysis of propensity score matched samples.经皮左心耳封堵术对心功能和结构重构的影响:倾向评分匹配样本的差异分析。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):519-528. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0047. Epub 2018 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?因果推断中的一致性声明:是定义还是假设?
Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):3-5. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ef366.
2
Does obesity shorten life? The importance of well-defined interventions to answer causal questions.肥胖会缩短寿命吗?明确界定干预措施以回答因果问题的重要性。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Aug;32 Suppl 3:S8-14. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.82.
3
Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.构建边际结构模型的逆概率权重。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn164. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
4
Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias.因果有向无环图与未测量混杂偏倚的方向
Epidemiology. 2008 Sep;19(5):720-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181810e29.
5
Impact of mis-specification of the treatment model on estimates from a marginal structural model.治疗模型的错误设定对边际结构模型估计值的影响。
Stat Med. 2008 Aug 15;27(18):3629-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.3200.
6
The sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding.未测量混杂因素的偏倚迹象。
Biometrics. 2008 Sep;64(3):702-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00957.x. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
7
Effect modification by time-varying covariates.随时间变化的协变量对效应的修正
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 1;166(9):994-1002; discussion 1003-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm231. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
8
The cost of checking proportional hazards.检验比例风险的成本。
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1248-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.3020.
9
A proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates and time-varying effects for analysis of fetal and infant death.一种用于分析胎儿和婴儿死亡的具有时间依存性协变量和时变效应的比例风险模型。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug 1;160(3):199-206. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh201.
10
A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research.流行病学研究中因果效应的定义。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):265-71. doi: 10.1136/jech.2002.006361.