Suppr超能文献

用于检测宫颈标本中沙眼衣原体的非同位素探针的评估。

Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

作者信息

Woods G L, Young A, Scott J C, Blair T M, Johnson A M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Feb;28(2):370-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.2.370-372.1990.

Abstract

A nonisotopic probe (Gen-Probe PACE; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens was evaluated in 344 women attending a dysplasia clinic or an obstetrics clinic and 158 women who visited an emergency room. For each patient, the probe, a tissue cell culture, and a direct immunofluorescent-antibody test (DFA; MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.) were used. C. trachomatis was detected in 54 specimens by at least one method. Forty-four, 44, and 37 specimens were positive by culture, probe, and DFA, respectively, and 31 were positive by all three methods. Considering culture-positive plus both probe- and DFA-positive results as the "gold standard," we determined the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the probe to be 80, 98, 82, and 98%, respectively. These values were 94, 98, 84, and 99%, respectively, in emergency room patients and 71, 98, 80, and 97%, respectively, in clinic patients. The sensitivities, specificities, and negative predictive values of the DFA and probe were comparable. The positive predictive values of the DFA in all patients and in emergency room and clinic patients were 97, 100, and 95%, respectively. Given the number of probe-positive results that were not confirmed by culture, we do not recommend using the Gen-Probe PACE to screen for C. trachomatis in women with a low to moderate risk for infection.

摘要

采用非同位素探针(基因探针PACE;基因探针公司,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥)检测344名就诊于发育异常门诊或产科门诊的女性以及158名就诊于急诊室的女性的宫颈标本中的沙眼衣原体。对每位患者,均使用该探针、组织细胞培养法以及直接免疫荧光抗体检测法(DFA;MicroTrak;Syva公司,加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)。通过至少一种方法在54份标本中检测到沙眼衣原体。培养法、探针法和DFA法分别有44份、44份和37份标本呈阳性,三种方法均呈阳性的有31份。将培养阳性以及探针和DFA均阳性的结果视为“金标准”,我们确定该探针的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为80%、98%、82%和98%。在急诊室患者中,这些值分别为94%、98%、84%和99%,在门诊患者中分别为71%、98%、80%和97%。DFA和探针的敏感性、特异性及阴性预测值具有可比性。在所有患者、急诊室患者和门诊患者中,DFA的阳性预测值分别为97%、100%和95%。鉴于未被培养法证实的探针阳性结果数量,我们不建议使用基因探针PACE对感染风险低至中度的女性进行沙眼衣原体筛查。

相似文献

4
Molecular techniques for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.检测沙眼衣原体的分子技术
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2359-63. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2359-2363.1989.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Failure of multiple passages to increase chlamydial recovery.多次传代未能提高衣原体回收率。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Oct;25(10):1851-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.10.1851-1853.1987.
5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验