• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全自动多分辨率边缘捕捉器——一种颈动脉超声 IMT 测量的精确新技术:多机构数据库的临床验证和基准测试。

Completely automated multiresolution edge snapper--a new technique for an accurate carotid ultrasound IMT measurement: clinical validation and benchmarking on a multi-institutional database.

机构信息

Department of Electronics, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Mar;21(3):1211-22. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2169270. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1109/TIP.2011.2169270
PMID:21947523
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe a novel and completely automated technique for carotid artery (CA) recognition, far (distal) wall segmentation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement, which is a strong clinical tool for risk assessment for cardiovascular diseases. The architecture of completely automated multiresolution edge snapper (CAMES) consists of the following two stages: 1) automated CA recognition based on a combination of scale-space and statistical classification in a multiresolution framework and 2) automated segmentation of lumen-intima (LI) and media-adventitia (MA) interfaces for the far (distal) wall and IMT measurement. Our database of 365 B-mode longitudinal carotid images is taken from four different institutions covering different ethnic backgrounds. The ground-truth (GT) database was the average manual segmentation from three clinical experts. The mean distance ± standard deviation of CAMES with respect to GT profiles for LI and MA interfaces were 0.081 ± 0.099 and 0.082 ± 0.197 mm, respectively. The IMT measurement error between CAMES and GT was 0.078 ± 0.112 mm. CAMES was benchmarked against a previously developed automated technique based on an integrated approach using feature-based extraction and classifier (CALEX). Although CAMES underestimated the IMT value, it had shown a strong improvement in segmentation errors against CALEX for LI and MA interfaces by 8% and 42%, respectively. The overall IMT measurement bias for CAMES improved by 36% against CALEX. Finally, this paper demonstrated that the figure-of-merit of CAMES was 95.8% compared with 87.4% for CALEX. The combination of multiresolution CA recognition and far-wall segmentation led to an automated, low-complexity, real-time, and accurate technique for carotid IMT measurement. Validation on a multiethnic/multi-institutional data set demonstrated the robustness of the technique, which can constitute a clinically valid IMT measurement for assistance in atherosclerosis disease management.

摘要

本文旨在描述一种新颖的、完全自动化的颈动脉(CA)识别、远(远端)壁分割和内膜中层厚度(IMT)测量技术,这是一种用于心血管疾病风险评估的强大临床工具。完全自动化多分辨率边缘捕捉器(CAMES)的架构由以下两个阶段组成:1)基于多分辨率框架中的尺度空间和统计分类的自动 CA 识别,2)用于远(远端)壁和 IMT 测量的管腔内膜(LI)和中膜外膜(MA)界面的自动分割。我们的 365 个 B 型纵向颈动脉图像数据库来自四个不同机构,涵盖不同的种族背景。地面真实(GT)数据库是来自三个临床专家的平均手动分割。CAMES 与 GT 轮廓的 LI 和 MA 界面的平均距离±标准偏差分别为 0.081±0.099 和 0.082±0.197mm。CAMES 与 GT 的 IMT 测量误差为 0.078±0.112mm。CAMES 与之前开发的基于特征提取和分类器(CALEX)的集成方法的自动技术进行了基准测试。尽管 CAMES 低估了 IMT 值,但与 CALEX 相比,它在 LI 和 MA 界面的分割误差方面有了很大的提高,分别提高了 8%和 42%。CAMES 的整体 IMT 测量偏差相对于 CALEX 提高了 36%。最后,本文证明 CAMES 的卓越值为 95.8%,而 CALEX 为 87.4%。多分辨率 CA 识别和远壁分割的结合,导致了一种自动化、低复杂度、实时和准确的颈动脉 IMT 测量技术。在多民族/多机构数据集上的验证证明了该技术的稳健性,它可以作为一种临床有效的 IMT 测量方法,用于动脉粥样硬化疾病的管理。

相似文献

1
Completely automated multiresolution edge snapper--a new technique for an accurate carotid ultrasound IMT measurement: clinical validation and benchmarking on a multi-institutional database.全自动多分辨率边缘捕捉器——一种颈动脉超声 IMT 测量的精确新技术:多机构数据库的临床验证和基准测试。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012 Mar;21(3):1211-22. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2011.2169270. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
2
CALSFOAM-completed automated local statistics based first order absolute moment" for carotid wall recognition, segmentation and IMT measurement: validation and benchmarking on a 300 patient database.用于颈动脉壁识别、分割和内膜中层厚度测量的“基于CALSFOAM完成的自动局部统计一阶绝对矩”:在一个300例患者数据库上的验证和基准测试
Int Angiol. 2011 Jun;30(3):227-41.
3
Completely automated robust edge snapper for carotid ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-institutional database of 300 images.完全自动化的鲁棒颈动脉超声 IMT 测量边缘捕捉器,适用于包含 300 张图像的多机构数据库。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Aug;49(8):935-45. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0781-8. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
4
Automated carotid artery intima layer regional segmentation.自动颈动脉内膜层区域分割。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 7;56(13):4073-90. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/021. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
5
Constrained snake vs. conventional snake for carotid ultrasound automated IMT measurements on multi-center data sets.约束蛇形与传统蛇形在多中心数据集颈动脉超声自动 IMT 测量中的比较。
Ultrasonics. 2012 Sep;52(7):949-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement.内中膜厚度:为完全自动化的超声测量方法设定标准。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010 May;57(5):1112-24. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1522.
7
Carotid artery recognition system: a comparison of three automated paradigms for ultrasound images.颈动脉识别系统:三种自动化超声图像分析范式的比较。
Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):378-91. doi: 10.1118/1.3670373.
8
Ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-ethnic and multi-institutional database: our review and experience using four fully automated and one semi-automated methods.多民族、多机构数据库的超声 IMT 测量:我们使用四种全自动和一种半自动方法的回顾和经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Dec;108(3):946-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
Fully automated dual-snake formulation for carotid intima-media thickness measurement. A new approach.全自动双蛇公式颈动脉内膜中层厚度测量。一种新方法。
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Jul;31(7):1123-36. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.7.1123.
10
A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound.颈动脉超声内膜中层厚度(IMT)测量和管壁分段技术的最新综述。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 Dec;100(3):201-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.007. Epub 2010 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
UltraAIGenomics: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment by Fusion of Ultrasound-Based Radiomics and Genomics Features for Preventive, Personalized and Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review.超人工智能基因组学:基于超声影像组学和基因组学特征融合的人工智能心血管疾病风险评估用于预防、个性化和精准医学:一篇综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 22;25(5):184. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505184. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and survival analysis on a Canadian cohort.基于加拿大队列的心血管疾病风险分层和生存分析的深度学习方法
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;40(6):1283-1303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
3
Ultrasound-Based Image Analysis for Predicting Carotid Artery Stenosis Risk: A Comprehensive Review of the Problem, Techniques, Datasets, and Future Directions.
基于超声的图像分析预测颈动脉狭窄风险:对问题、技术、数据集及未来方向的全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;13(15):2614. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152614.
4
Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review.深度学习框架下的心血管疾病/中风风险分层:综述
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Jun 30;13(3):557-598. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-438. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Attention-Based UNet Deep Learning Model for Plaque Segmentation in Carotid Ultrasound for Stroke Risk Stratification: An Artificial Intelligence Paradigm.基于注意力机制的U-Net深度学习模型用于颈动脉超声斑块分割以进行中风风险分层:一种人工智能范式
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Sep 27;9(10):326. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100326.
6
COVLIAS 1.0 vs. MedSeg: An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Lesion Segmentation in COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Scans.COVLIAS 1.0与MedSeg:一种用于COVID-19肺部计算机断层扫描中病变自动分割的人工智能框架。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 21;12(5):1283. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051283.
7
Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.在COVID-19/非COVID-19框架下通过人工智能范式的动脉粥样硬化途径对糖尿病视网膜病变进行心血管风险分层:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 14;12(5):1234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051234.
8
Cardiovascular disease detection using machine learning and carotid/femoral arterial imaging frameworks in rheumatoid arthritis patients.利用机器学习和颈动脉/股动脉成像框架在类风湿关节炎患者中进行心血管疾病检测。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Feb;42(2):215-239. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05062-4. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Unseen Artificial Intelligence-Deep Learning Paradigm for Segmentation of Low Atherosclerotic Plaque in Carotid Ultrasound: A Multicenter Cardiovascular Study.用于颈动脉超声中低动脉粥样硬化斑块分割的不可见人工智能深度学习范式:一项多中心心血管研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;11(12):2257. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122257.
10
Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome for COVID-19 Lung Patients: A Biomedical Imaging Perspective.COVID-19 肺患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征人工智能的系统评价:生物医学成像视角。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Nov;25(11):4128-4139. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3103839. Epub 2021 Nov 5.