Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Ambio. 2011 Nov;40(7):762-80. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.
This article explores the links between agency, institutions, and innovation in navigating shifts and large-scale transformations toward global sustainability. Our central question is whether social and technical innovations can reverse the trends that are challenging critical thresholds and creating tipping points in the earth system, and if not, what conditions are necessary to escape the current lock-in. Large-scale transformations in information technology, nano- and biotechnology, and new energy systems have the potential to significantly improve our lives; but if, in framing them, our globalized society fails to consider the capacity of the biosphere, there is a risk that unsustainable development pathways may be reinforced. Current institutional arrangements, including the lack of incentives for the private sector to innovate for sustainability, and the lags inherent in the path dependent nature of innovation, contribute to lock-in, as does our incapacity to easily grasp the interactions implicit in complex problems, referred to here as the ingenuity gap. Nonetheless, promising social and technical innovations with potential to change unsustainable trajectories need to be nurtured and connected to broad institutional resources and responses. In parallel, institutional entrepreneurs can work to reduce the resilience of dominant institutional systems and position viable shadow alternatives and niche regimes.
本文探讨了在应对向全球可持续性转变的过程中,能动性、机构和创新之间的联系。我们的核心问题是,社会和技术创新是否能够扭转那些挑战关键阈值和地球系统临界点的趋势,如果不能,需要什么条件才能摆脱当前的锁定状态。信息技术、纳米技术和生物技术以及新能源系统的大规模转型有可能极大地改善我们的生活;但如果在构建这些技术时,我们这个全球化的社会未能考虑到生物圈的承载能力,那么就有可能强化不可持续的发展路径。当前的体制安排,包括私营部门缺乏可持续创新的激励,以及创新的路径依赖性质所固有的滞后,都促成了锁定状态的形成,而我们难以轻易理解复杂问题中隐含的相互作用(这里称为创造力差距)也是原因之一。尽管如此,具有改变不可持续轨迹潜力的有前途的社会和技术创新仍需要得到培育,并与广泛的体制资源和应对措施联系起来。与此同时,体制企业家可以努力降低主导体制系统的弹性,并为可行的影子替代方案和利基制度定位。