• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于知情者的 AD8 问卷西班牙版本的诊断准确性(DA)。

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of the Spanish version of the informant-based AD8 questionnaire.

机构信息

Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España.

出版信息

Neurologia. 2013 Mar;28(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2012.03.012
PMID:22652137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3485452/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The AD8 is a brief informant-based questionnaire that may also be self-administered, and which aids in identifying cognitive impairment (CI). Our goal is to assess the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of a Spanish version of that questionnaire.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study of a clinical sample of patient/informant dyads including 330 subjects with suspected CI or dementia (DEM) and 71 controls. We evaluated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and validity (partial correlations with GDS stage, Fototest results and functional index measure [FIM]). We assessed DA for CI vs no CI (GDS stage 3-4) using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the cut-off with the highest Youden index was determined to be optimal.

RESULTS

In the sample, 105 subjects had no CI, 99 had CI without DEM and 203 had DEM. Internal consistency was high (α 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.92), as were correlations with the GDS score (r=0.72, P<.001), Fototest results (r=-0.61, P<.001) and FIM (r=0.59, P<.001). The AUC for AD8 was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.93), which was not significantly different from that of the Fototest (AUC 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.96). The optimal cut-off point was 3/4 with a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.96) and a specificity of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.88); 88.8% of the classifications were correct. Combined use of AD8 and the Fototest significantly improved the DA of both (AUC 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98, P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish version of the AD8 questionnaire preserves the psychometric qualities and DA of the original. Using this test in combination with the Fototest significantly increases the DA of both tests.

摘要

简介

AD8 是一种简短的基于信息的问卷,也可以由患者/知情者自行填写,有助于识别认知障碍(CI)。我们的目标是评估该问卷的西班牙文版本的诊断准确性(DA)。

材料和方法

对包括 330 例疑似 CI 或痴呆(DEM)患者/知情者和 71 例对照者在内的临床样本进行了横断面研究。我们评估了内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)和有效性(与 GDS 分期、Fototest 结果和功能指数测量 [FIM] 的部分相关)。我们使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)评估 CI 与无 CI(GDS 分期 3-4)的 DA,并确定具有最高 Youden 指数的截断值为最佳值。

结果

在样本中,105 例无 CI,99 例有 CI 而无 DEM,203 例有 DEM。内部一致性很高(α 0.90,95%置信区间:0.89-0.92),与 GDS 评分(r=0.72,P<.001)、Fototest 结果(r=-0.61,P<.001)和 FIM(r=0.59,P<.001)呈高度相关。AD8 的 AUC 为 0.90(95%置信区间:0.86-0.93),与 Fototest(AUC 0.93,95%置信区间:0.89-0.96)无显著差异。最佳截断点为 3/4,灵敏度为 0.93(95%置信区间:0.88-0.96),特异性为 0.81(95%置信区间:0.72-0.88);88.8%的分类正确。AD8 和 Fototest 联合使用显著提高了两者的 DA(AUC 0.96,95%置信区间:0.93-0.98,P<.05)。

结论

AD8 问卷的西班牙文版本保留了原始问卷的心理测量质量和 DA。使用该测试与 Fototest 联合使用可显著提高两种测试的 DA。

相似文献

1
Assessing the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of the Spanish version of the informant-based AD8 questionnaire.评估基于知情者的 AD8 问卷西班牙版本的诊断准确性(DA)。
Neurologia. 2013 Mar;28(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 May 30.
2
The reliability and validity of the informant AD8 by comparison with a series of cognitive assessment tools in primary healthcare.在初级医疗保健中,通过与一系列认知评估工具相比较, informant AD8的可靠性和有效性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Mar;28(3):443-52. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001702. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
[FOTOTRANS study: multicentre study on the validity of Fototest under clinical practice conditions].[FOTOTRANS研究:临床实践条件下Fototest有效性的多中心研究]
Neurologia. 2012 Mar;27(2):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
4
The informant AD8 is superior to participant AD8 in detecting cognitive impairment in a memory clinic setting.知情者 AD8 比参与者 AD8 更擅长在记忆诊所环境中检测认知障碍。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;35(1):159-68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122026.
5
AD8 Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Impairment: Pragmatic Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study.用于认知障碍的AD8知情者问卷:实用诊断测试准确性研究。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2015 Sep;28(3):198-202. doi: 10.1177/0891988715573536. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
6
Evaluation of cognitive impairment in older adults: combining brief informant and performance measures.老年人认知障碍的评估:结合简短的 informant 评估和表现测量方法
Arch Neurol. 2007 May;64(5):718-24. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.5.718.
7
Comparative validity of informant tools for assessing pre-stroke cognitive impairment.用于评估卒中前认知障碍的知情者工具的比较有效性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;37(4). doi: 10.1002/gps.5700.
8
Test Your Memory-Spanish version (TYM-S): a validation study of a self-administered cognitive screening test.测试你的记忆广度 - 西班牙语版本(TYM-S):一项自我管理的认知筛查测试的验证研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;29(7):730-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.4055. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
9
Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the ascertain dementia 8-item (AD8-F) informant interview in Iranian patients with mild neurocognitive disorder.伊朗轻度神经认知障碍患者使用阿兹海默病 8 项简易筛查量表(AD8-F)访谈进行评估的信度和效度研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03391-y.
10
The Informant AD8 Can Discriminate Patients with Dementia From Healthy Control Participants in an Asian Older Cohort.知情者 AD8 可以在亚洲老年队列中区分痴呆患者和健康对照参与者。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):775-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.023. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A re-evaluation study and literature review on AD8 as a screening tool for dementia.一项关于AD8作为痴呆筛查工具的重新评估研究及文献综述。
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0321570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321570. eCollection 2025.
2
Comprehensive Gerontological Assessment: An Update on the Concept and Its Evaluation Tools in Latin America and the Caribbean-A Literature Review.综合老年医学评估:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区概念及其评估工具的最新情况——文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;21(12):1697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121697.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire by participant and informant-A systematic review and meta-analysis.参与者和知情人评估的 Ascertain Dementia 8 项问卷的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 12;18(9):e0291291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291291. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and validation of the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8) Thai version.《Ascertain Dementia 8(AD8)泰文版的编制与验证》。
Psychogeriatrics. 2022 Nov;22(6):795-801. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12884. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
A text message intervention to support latino dementia family caregivers (CuidaTEXT): feasibility study.短信干预支持拉丁裔痴呆症家庭照顾者(CuidaTEXT):可行性研究。
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Jan-Dec;47(1):50-65. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2137449. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the ascertain dementia 8-item (AD8-F) informant interview in Iranian patients with mild neurocognitive disorder.伊朗轻度神经认知障碍患者使用阿兹海默病 8 项简易筛查量表(AD8-F)访谈进行评估的信度和效度研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03391-y.
7
Does Your Loved One With Cognitive Symptoms Need to See a Doctor? Check It Online.你认知出现症状的亲人需要看医生吗?在线自查一下。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Jul 14;16:840200. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.840200. eCollection 2022.
8
A Text Messaging Intervention to Support Latinx Family Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia (CuidaTEXT): Development and Usability Study.一项支持拉丁裔痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的短信干预措施(CuidaTEXT):开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Apr 28;5(2):e35625. doi: 10.2196/35625.
9
Validation of AD8-Philippines (AD8-P): A Brief Informant-Based Questionnaire for Dementia Screening in the Philippines.菲律宾版AD8问卷(AD8-P)的验证:一种基于 informant 的用于菲律宾痴呆筛查的简短问卷。
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2021 Oct 31;2021:7750235. doi: 10.1155/2021/7750235. eCollection 2021.
10
Diagnosis of Early Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical Practice in 2021.早期阿尔茨海默病的诊断:2021 年的临床实践。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(3):371-386. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.23.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy, effectiveness and cost for cognitive impairment and dementia screening of three short cognitive tests applicable to illiterates.三种适用于文盲的简短认知测验在认知障碍和痴呆筛查中的诊断准确性、效果和成本。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027069. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
2
Effectiveness and costs of phototest in dementia and cognitive impairment screening.光测试在痴呆症和认知障碍筛查中的效果和成本。
BMC Neurol. 2011 Jul 29;11:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-92.
3
AD8-Brazil: cross-cultural validation of the ascertaining dementia interview in Portuguese.AD8-巴西:用葡萄牙语对认知障碍筛查访谈进行跨文化验证。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(1):177-85. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-100915.
4
Application of AD8 questionnaire to screen very mild dementia in Taiwanese.应用 AD8 问卷筛查台湾地区极轻度痴呆。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2011 Mar;26(2):134-8. doi: 10.1177/1533317510397330.
5
[Usefulness of a brief informant interview to detect dementia, translated into Spanish (AD8-Ch)].[简短告知者访谈在痴呆症检测中的效用,翻译成西班牙语(AD8 - Ch)]
Rev Med Chil. 2010 Aug;138(8):1063-5. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
6
Relationship of dementia screening tests with biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.痴呆症筛查测试与阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的关系。
Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3290-300. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq204. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
7
French-English cross-linguistic comparison and diagnostic impact of the AD-8 dementia screening questionnaire in a geriatric assessment clinic.在老年评估诊所中,AD-8 痴呆筛查问卷的法-英跨语言比较和诊断影响。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;29(3):265-74. doi: 10.1159/000289815. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
8
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the AD8 informant interview (K-AD8) in dementia.中文版 AD8 知情者访谈(K-AD8)在痴呆症中的有效性和可靠性。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Oct-Dec;23(4):371-6. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819e6881.
9
[Diagnostic accuracy of the Phototest for cognitive impairment and dementia].[用于认知障碍和痴呆症的光测试的诊断准确性]
Neurologia. 2007 Dec;22(10):860-9.
10
Natural history of decline in instrumental activities of daily living performance over the 10 years preceding the clinical diagnosis of dementia: a prospective population-based study.痴呆临床诊断前10年日常生活工具性活动能力下降的自然史:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01499.x. Epub 2007 Nov 20.