• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大乳腺癌和头颈部癌症生存者护理计划的定性评估。

Qualitative evaluation of care plans for Canadian breast and head-and-neck cancer survivors.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial and Spiritual Resources, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB. ; Department of Oncology, Palliative Care Division, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. ; Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(1):e18-28. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1698.

DOI:10.3747/co.21.1698
PMID:24523618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survivorship care plans (scps) have been recommended as a way to ease the transition from active cancer treatment to follow-up care, to reduce uncertainty for survivors in the management of their ongoing health, and to improve continuity of care. The objective of the demonstration project reported here was to assess the value of scps for cancer survivors in western Canada.

METHODS

The Alberta CancerBridges team developed, implemented, and evaluated scps for 36 breast and 21 head-and-neck cancer survivors. For the evaluation, we interviewed 12 of the survivors, 9 nurses who delivered the scps, and 3 family physicians who received the scps (n = 24 in total). We asked about satisfaction, usefulness, emotional impact, and communication value. We collected written feedback from the three groups about positive aspects of the scps and possible improvements (n = 85). We analyzed the combined data using qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Survivors, nurses, and family physicians agreed that scps could ease the transition to survivorship partly by enhancing communication between survivors and care providers. Survivors appreciated the individualized attention and the comprehensiveness of the plans. They described positive emotional impacts, but wanted a way to ensure that their physicians received the scps. Nurses and physicians responded positively, but expressed concern about the time required to implement the plans. Suggestions for streamlining the process included providing survivors with scp templates in advance, auto-populating the templates for the nurses, and creating summary pages for physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest ways in which scps could help to improve the transition to cancer survivorship and provide starting points for larger feasibility studies.

摘要

背景

生存护理计划(SCPs)已被推荐为一种缓解从积极的癌症治疗到后续护理的过渡的方式,以减少幸存者在管理其持续健康方面的不确定性,并改善护理的连续性。本报告所述示范项目的目的是评估 SCPs 对加拿大西部癌症幸存者的价值。

方法

艾伯塔省癌症桥梁团队为 36 名乳腺癌和 21 名头颈部癌症幸存者制定、实施和评估了 SCPs。为了进行评估,我们采访了 12 名幸存者、9 名提供 SCPs 的护士和 3 名接受 SCPs 的家庭医生(总共 24 人)。我们询问了他们对满意度、有用性、情绪影响和沟通价值的看法。我们从三组人员那里收集了关于 SCPs 的积极方面和可能改进的书面反馈(共 85 人)。我们使用定性主题分析对综合数据进行了分析。

结果

幸存者、护士和家庭医生都认为,SCPs 可以通过增强幸存者和护理提供者之间的沟通,部分缓解向生存者的过渡。幸存者赞赏个性化的关注和计划的全面性。他们描述了积极的情绪影响,但希望有一种方法可以确保他们的医生收到 SCPs。护士和医生的反应积极,但对实施计划所需的时间表示关注。简化流程的建议包括提前为幸存者提供 SCP 模板、为护士自动填充模板以及为医生创建摘要页面。

结论

研究结果表明,SCPs 可以帮助改善癌症生存者的过渡,并为更大规模的可行性研究提供起点。

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of care plans for Canadian breast and head-and-neck cancer survivors.加拿大乳腺癌和头颈部癌症生存者护理计划的定性评估。
Curr Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(1):e18-28. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1698.
2
Healthcare provider perspectives on pediatric cancer survivorship care plans: a single institution pilot study.医疗机构对儿童癌症生存者照护计划的看法:单机构试点研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05522-w. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
Assessing Key Stakeholders' Knowledge, Needs, and Preferences for Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Plans.评估关键利益相关者对头颈癌幸存者护理计划的知识、需求和偏好。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):584-591. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1345-5.
4
The impact of survivorship care plans on adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors and their primary care providers.生存护理计划对青少年和青年头颈部癌症幸存者及其初级保健提供者的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 7;31(7):448. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07860-x.
5
An Assessment to Inform Pediatric Cancer Provider Development and Delivery of Survivor Care Plans.一项为儿科癌症医疗服务提供者制定和提供幸存者护理计划提供参考的评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0829-9.
6
Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers?生存护理计划:社区肿瘤学提供者是否认同?
Cancer. 2014 Mar 1;120(5):722-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28472. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
8
Strategies for Successful Survivorship Care Plan Implementation: Results From a Qualitative Study.成功实施生存护理计划的策略:一项定性研究的结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Aug;14(8):e462-e483. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00054. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
9
Perspectives of Survivorship Care Plans Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.老年乳腺癌幸存者生存护理计划观点:一项初步研究。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820917208. doi: 10.1177/1073274820917208.
10
Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care.美国生存护理计划的使用:与生存护理的关联。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Oct 16;105(20):1579-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt258. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of preferences and responses to recall in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.对接受放射治疗的青少年和青年头颈癌幸存者的偏好及回忆反应的分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 14;33(4):281. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09340-w.
2
Interventions to Support Transitions in Care Among Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.支持癌症患者护理过渡的干预措施:一项范围综述
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(5):e70660. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70660.
3
Optimizing the integration of family physicians into cancer survivorship care in the BC Interior: a mixed methods study of physicians' opinions and experiences.优化家庭医生融入不列颠哥伦比亚省内陆地区癌症幸存者护理体系:一项关于医生观点与经验的混合方法研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb 4. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01751-2.
4
Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.从全科医学角度提高癌症治疗轨迹中护理质量的医疗实践:范围综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration.记录患者和提供者在提出随机对照试验时的偏好:定性探索。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 6;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01549-1.
6
Canadian Resources, Programs, and Models of Care to Support Cancer Survivors' Transition beyond Treatment: A Scoping Review.加拿大支持癌症幸存者治疗后过渡的资源、项目和护理模式:范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jun 9;28(3):2134-2145. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030198.
7
Implementation of a Survivorship Care Plan Program in a Community-Based Oncology Clinic.在社区肿瘤诊所实施生存护理计划项目。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(7):665-676. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.7.3. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
8
Oncologists' perceptions of the usefulness of cancer survivorship care plan components.肿瘤学家对癌症生存护理计划组成部分有用性的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):945-954. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05531-9. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
9
Perspectives of Survivorship Care Plans Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.老年乳腺癌幸存者生存护理计划观点:一项初步研究。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820917208. doi: 10.1177/1073274820917208.
10
A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer.两种儿童癌症成年幸存者随访护理模式的比较。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00774-w. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive-behavioral stress management reverses anxiety-related leukocyte transcriptional dynamics.认知行为应激管理可逆转焦虑相关的白细胞转录动力学。
Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb 15;71(4):366-72. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
2
Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer.评估生存护理计划:一项针对乳腺癌患者的随机临床试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4755-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8373. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
3
Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring?医学研究所建议后的生存护理计划:我们进展如何?
J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Dec;5(4):358-70. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0196-4. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
4
Reciprocal regulation of the neural and innate immune systems.神经和先天免疫系统的相互调节。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Aug 5;11(9):625-32. doi: 10.1038/nri3042.
5
Clinical update: psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors.临床更新:乳腺癌幸存者的心理社会反应。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011 Aug;27(3):e1-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.05.001.
6
Survivors of breast cancer: patient perspectives on survivorship care planning.乳腺癌幸存者:患者对生存护理计划的看法。
J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Dec;5(4):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0185-7. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
7
Patient preferences concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services.患者对治疗方案、生存护理计划、教育及支持服务的偏好。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 May;38(3):335-42. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.335-342.
8
Distress trajectories at the first year diagnosis of breast cancer in relation to 6 years survivorship.乳腺癌确诊后第一年的困扰轨迹与 6 年生存状况的关系。
Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):90-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1876. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
9
It's not over when it's over: long-term symptoms in cancer survivors--a systematic review.结束并不意味着结束:癌症幸存者的长期症状——系统评价。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2010;40(2):163-81. doi: 10.2190/PM.40.2.c.
10
Survivorship care after breast cancer: follow-up practices of Australian health professionals and attitudes to a survivorship care plan.乳腺癌后的生存护理:澳大利亚医疗专业人员的随访实践及对生存护理计划的态度
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;6(2):116-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01286.x.