Suppr超能文献

住院成年烧伤患者革兰氏阴性菌伤口感染——系统评价与荟萃分析

Gram negative wound infection in hospitalised adult burn patients--systematic review and metanalysis-.

作者信息

Azzopardi Ernest A, Azzopardi Elayne, Camilleri Liberato, Villapalos Jorge, Boyce Dean E, Dziewulski Peter, Dickson William A, Whitaker Iain S

机构信息

Institute of Life Science, Swansea University College of Medicine, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingodm; The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Moriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Elizabeth Gaskell Campus, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095042. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gram negative infection is a major determinant of morbidity and survival. Traditional teaching suggests that burn wound infections in different centres are caused by differing sets of causative organisms. This study established whether Gram-negative burn wound isolates associated to clinical wound infection differ between burn centres.

METHODS

Studies investigating adult hospitalised patients (2000-2010) were critically appraised and qualified to a levels of evidence hierarchy. The contribution of bacterial pathogen type, and burn centre to the variance in standardised incidence of Gram-negative burn wound infection was analysed using two-way analysis of variance.

PRIMARY FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanni, Enterobacter spp., Proteus spp. and Escherichia coli emerged as the commonest Gram-negative burn wound pathogens. Individual pathogens' incidence did not differ significantly between burn centres (F (4, 20) = 1.1, p = 0.3797; r2 = 9.84).

INTERPRETATION

Gram-negative infections predominate in burn surgery. This study is the first to establish that burn wound infections do not differ significantly between burn centres. It is the first study to report the pathogens responsible for the majority of Gram-negative infections in these patients. Whilst burn wound infection is not exclusive to these bacteria, it is hoped that reporting the presence of this group of common Gram-negative "target organisms" facilitate clinical practice and target research towards a defined clinical demand.

摘要

背景

革兰氏阴性菌感染是发病率和生存率的主要决定因素。传统观点认为,不同烧伤中心的烧伤创面感染由不同的致病微生物引起。本研究旨在确定与临床创面感染相关的革兰氏阴性烧伤创面分离菌在不同烧伤中心是否存在差异。

方法

对调查2000年至2010年住院成年患者的研究进行严格评估,并将其纳入证据等级体系。采用双向方差分析,分析细菌病原体类型和烧伤中心对革兰氏阴性烧伤创面感染标准化发病率差异的影响。

主要发现

铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、肠杆菌属、变形杆菌属和大肠杆菌是最常见的革兰氏阴性烧伤创面病原体。各病原体在不同烧伤中心的发病率差异无统计学意义(F(4, 20) = 1.1,p = 0.3797;r2 = 9.84)。

解读

革兰氏阴性菌感染在烧伤手术中占主导地位。本研究首次证实不同烧伤中心的烧伤创面感染差异无统计学意义。这也是首次报告导致这些患者大多数革兰氏阴性菌感染的病原体。虽然烧伤创面感染并非仅由这些细菌引起,但希望报告这组常见的革兰氏阴性“目标菌”有助于临床实践,并针对明确的临床需求开展研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2460/3994014/d671a92aadaf/pone.0095042.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验