Adamowicz Michael S, Stasulli Dominique M, Sobestanovich Emily M, Bille Todd W
Forensic Science Department, Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice & Forensic Sciences, University of New Haven, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
National Laboratory Center, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Ammendale, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116351. eCollection 2014.
Samples for forensic DNA analysis are often collected from a wide variety of objects using cotton or nylon tipped swabs. Testing has shown that significant quantities of DNA are retained on the swab, however, and subsequently lost. When processing evidentiary samples, the recovery of the maximum amount of available DNA is critical, potentially dictating whether a usable profile can be derived from a piece of evidence or not. The QIAamp DNA Investigator extraction kit was used with its recommended protocol for swabs (one hour incubation at 56°C) as a baseline. Results indicate that over 50% of the recoverable DNA may be retained on the cotton swab tip, or otherwise lost, for both blood and buccal cell samples when using this protocol. The protocol's incubation time and temperature were altered, as was incubating while shaking or stationary to test for increases in recovery efficiency. An additional step was then tested that included periodic re-suspension of the swab tip in the extraction buffer during incubation. Aliquots of liquid blood or a buccal cell suspension were deposited and dried on cotton swabs and compared with swab-less controls. The concentration of DNA in each extract was quantified and STR analysis was performed to assess the quality of the extracted DNA. Stationary incubations and those performed at 65°C did not result in significant gains in DNA yield. Samples incubated for 24 hours yielded less DNA. Increased yields were observed with three and 18 hour incubation periods. Increases in DNA yields were also observed using a swab re-suspension method for both cell types. The swab re-suspension method yielded an average two-fold increase in recovered DNA yield with buccal cells and an average three-fold increase with blood cells. These findings demonstrate that more of the DNA collected on swabs can be recovered with specific protocol alterations.
法医DNA分析样本通常使用棉头或尼龙头拭子从各种物体上采集。然而,测试表明,大量DNA保留在拭子上,随后丢失。在处理证据样本时,尽可能多地回收可用DNA至关重要,这可能决定能否从一件证据中获得可用的DNA图谱。以QIAamp DNA Investigator提取试剂盒及其推荐的拭子提取方案(56°C孵育1小时)作为基线。结果表明,使用该方案时,对于血液和颊细胞样本,超过50%的可回收DNA可能保留在棉拭子尖端或丢失。改变了该方案的孵育时间和温度,同时测试了振荡孵育或静置孵育对回收效率的提高情况。然后测试了一个额外步骤,即在孵育期间定期将拭子尖端重新悬浮在提取缓冲液中。将液态血液或颊细胞悬液的等分试样沉积在棉拭子上并干燥,与无拭子对照进行比较。对每个提取物中的DNA浓度进行定量,并进行STR分析以评估提取DNA的质量。静置孵育和在65°C下进行的孵育并未显著提高DNA产量。孵育24小时的样本产生的DNA较少。在3小时和18小时的孵育期观察到产量增加。对于两种细胞类型,使用拭子重新悬浮方法也观察到DNA产量增加。拭子重新悬浮方法使颊细胞的回收DNA产量平均增加两倍,血细胞平均增加三倍。这些发现表明,通过特定的方案改变,可以回收更多收集在拭子上的DNA。