Li Shuming, Shen Tong, Liang Yongshan, Zhang Ying, Bai Bo
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Orthopaedics Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0137033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137033. eCollection 2015.
Chronic neck pain is a highly prevalent condition, and is often treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Limited clinical studies with short-term follow-up have shown promising efficacy of acupuncture as well as miniscalpel-needle (MSN) release. In this retrospective study, we examined whether MSN release could produce long-lasting relief in patients with chronic neck pain.
We retrieved the medical records of all patients receiving weekly MSN release treatment for chronic neck pain at this institution during a period from May 2012 to December 2013. Only cases with the following information at prior to, and 1, 6, and 12 months after the treatment, were included in the analysis: neck disability index (NDI), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and active cervical range of motion (CROM). The primary analysis of interest is comparison of the 12-month measures with the baseline. Patients who took analgesic drugs or massage within 2 weeks prior to assessment were excluded from the analysis. For MSN release, tender points were identified manually by an experienced physician, and did not necessarily follow the traditional acupuncture system. MSN was inserted vertically (parallel to the spine) until breaking through resistance and patient reporting of distention, soreness or heaviness. The depth of the needling ranged from 10 to 50 mm. The release was carried out by moving the MSN up and down 3-5 times without rotation.
A total of 559 cases (patients receiving weekly MSN release treatment for chronic neck pain) were screened. The number of cases with complete information (NDI, NPRS, and CROM at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months after last treatment) was 180. After excluding the cases with analgesic treatment or massage within 2 weeks of assessment (n = 53), a total of 127 cases were included in data analysis. The number of MSN release session was 7 (range: 4-11). At 12 months after the treatment, both NPRS and NDI were significantly lower [3 (0, 9) vs. 7 (5, 10) at the baseline for NPRS; [7 (0, 21) vs. 17 (9, 36) for NDI; p<0.001 for both]. All 6 measures of CROM were significantly higher at 12 months vs. the baseline. No severe complications (such as nerve damage and hematoma) were noted.
MSN release is effective, even 12 months after the treatment, in patients with chronic neck pain. Caution must be exercised in data interpretation due to the respective nature of the study and lack of a comparator group.
慢性颈部疼痛是一种非常普遍的病症,常使用非甾体类抗炎药进行治疗。短期随访的有限临床研究表明,针灸以及小针刀(MSN)松解术具有良好的疗效。在这项回顾性研究中,我们探讨了MSN松解术能否为慢性颈部疼痛患者带来持久缓解。
我们检索了2012年5月至2013年12月期间在本机构接受每周一次MSN松解术治疗慢性颈部疼痛的所有患者的病历。仅纳入在治疗前、治疗后1个月、6个月和12个月具有以下信息的病例进行分析:颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)和颈椎活动度(CROM)。主要分析关注点是将12个月时的测量结果与基线进行比较。在评估前2周内服用镇痛药或接受按摩的患者被排除在分析之外。对于MSN松解术,由经验丰富的医生手动确定压痛点,不一定遵循传统的针灸穴位系统。将MSN垂直插入(与脊柱平行),直至突破阻力且患者报告有胀感、酸痛或沉重感。针刺深度为10至50毫米。通过上下移动MSN 3至5次但不旋转来进行松解。
共筛查了559例(接受每周一次MSN松解术治疗慢性颈部疼痛的患者)。具有完整信息(基线、最后一次治疗后1个月、6个月和12个月时的NDI、NPRS和CROM)的病例数为180例。在排除评估前2周内接受镇痛治疗或按摩的病例(n = 53)后,共有127例纳入数据分析。MSN松解术的次数为7次(范围:4至11次)。治疗后12个月时,NPRS和NDI均显著降低[NPRS基线时为7(5,10),12个月时为3(0,9);NDI基线时为17(9,36),12个月时为7(0,21);两者p均<0.001]。CROM的所有6项测量指标在12个月时均显著高于基线。未观察到严重并发症(如神经损伤和血肿)。
MSN松解术对慢性颈部疼痛患者有效(即使在治疗后12个月)。由于研究的性质以及缺乏对照组,在数据解读时必须谨慎。