Stirman Shannon Wiltsey, Pontoski Kristin, Creed Torrey, Xhezo Regina, Evans Arthur C, Beck Aaron T, Crits-Christoph Paul
Dissemination and Training Division, National Center for PTSD and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System and Stanford University, 795 Willow Road (NC-PTSD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3535 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jan;44(1):55-66. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0700-7.
Despite the central role of training and consultation in the implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions (EBPIs), comprehensive reviews of research on training have highlighted serious gaps in knowledge regarding best practices. Consultation after initial didactic training appears to be of critical importance, but there has been very little research to determine optimal consultation format or interventions. This observational study compared two consultation formats that included review of session audio and feedback in the context of a program to train clinicians (n = 85) in community mental health clinics to deliver cognitive therapy (CT). A "gold standard" condition in which clinicians received individual feedback after expert consultants reviewed full sessions was compared to a group consultation format in which short segments of session audio were reviewed by a group of clinicians and an expert consultant. After adjusting for potential baseline differences between individuals in the two consultation conditions, few differences were found in terms of successful completion of the consultation phase or in terms of competence in CT at the end of consultation or after a 2 year follow-up. However, analyses did not support hypotheses regarding non-inferiority of the group consultation condition. While both groups largely maintained competence, clinicians in the group consultation condition demonstrated increases in competence over the follow-up period, while a sub-group of those in the individual condition experienced decreases. These findings, if replicated, have important implications for EBP implementation programs, as they suggest that observation and feedback is feasible in community mental health setting, and that employing this method in a group format is an effective and efficient consultation strategy that may enhance the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based psychotherapies.
尽管培训和咨询在循证心理干预(EBPI)的实施中起着核心作用,但对培训研究的全面综述凸显了在最佳实践知识方面的严重差距。初始讲授式培训后的咨询似乎至关重要,但很少有研究来确定最佳的咨询形式或干预措施。这项观察性研究比较了两种咨询形式,这两种形式都包括在一个培训社区心理健康诊所的临床医生(n = 85)提供认知疗法(CT)的项目中对课程音频进行回顾和反馈。将临床医生在专家顾问审查完整课程后获得个人反馈的“黄金标准”条件与一种小组咨询形式进行比较,在小组咨询形式中,一组临床医生和一名专家顾问对课程音频的短片段进行审查。在调整了两种咨询条件下个体之间潜在的基线差异后,在咨询阶段的成功完成方面,以及在咨询结束时或两年随访后在CT能力方面,几乎没有发现差异。然而,分析并不支持关于小组咨询条件非劣效性的假设。虽然两组在很大程度上都保持了能力,但小组咨询条件下的临床医生在随访期间能力有所提高,而个别条件下的一个亚组能力则有所下降。这些发现如果得到重复验证,对循证实践实施项目具有重要意义,因为它们表明观察和反馈在社区心理健康环境中是可行的,并且以小组形式采用这种方法是一种有效且高效的咨询策略,可能会增强循证心理治疗的实施和可持续性。