Mazidi Mohsen, Rezaie Peyman, Karimi Ehsan, Kengne Andre Pascal
Key State Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chaoyang, Beijing, China; Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, International College, University of Chinese Academy of Science (IC-UCAS), West Beichen Road, Chaoyang, China.
Biochemistry and Nutrition Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:850-857. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies to determine the effect of bile acid sequestrants (BAS) on lipid profile and blood glucose concentrations.
PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Database and Google Scholar databases were searched (up until August 2016) to identify prospective studies evaluating the impact of BASs on the cardio-metabolic profile. Random effects model meta-analysis was used for quantitative data synthesis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. Heterogeneity was quantitatively assessed using the I index. Systematic review registration: CRD42016035973.
From a total of 769 entries identified, 15 studies were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in fasting serum triglyceride concentrations following treatment with BASs (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.54mg/dL, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.65, heterogeneity p=0.021; I 54.2%, n=11 studies). The WMDs for total serum cholesterol (TC) was -1.18mg/dL (95% CI -1.30 to -1.06, heterogeneity p=0012; I 63.1%, n=11 studies), 0.126mg/dL (95% CI 0.02 to 0.22, heterogeneity p=0.231; I 43.2%, n=11 studies) for HDL-cholesterol, and -0.24mg/dL (95% CI -0.35 to -0.14, heterogeneity p=0.562; I 23.1%, n=10 studies) for LDL-cholesterol, and -2.10mg/dL (95% CI -2.84 to -1.36, heterogeneity p=0.200; I 42.6%, n=11 studies) fasting blood glucose (FBG) and -0.83% (95% CI -1.08 to -0.57, heterogeneity p=0.856; I 20.9%, n=11 studies) for HbA1c. These findings were robust in sensitivity analyses.
This meta-analysis suggests that therapy with BAS significantly improves HDL-C, LDL-C, and glycemic markers including fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, while deteriorating triglyceride levels.
对前瞻性临床研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定胆汁酸螯合剂(BAS)对血脂谱和血糖浓度的影响。
检索PubMed-Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane数据库和谷歌学术数据库(截至2016年8月),以识别评估BAS对心脏代谢谱影响的前瞻性研究。采用随机效应模型荟萃分析进行定量数据合成。使用逐一剔除法进行敏感性分析。使用I指数对异质性进行定量评估。系统评价注册号:CRD42016035973。
在总共识别出的769条记录中,15项研究纳入最终分析。荟萃分析表明,使用BAS治疗后空腹血清甘油三酯浓度显著降低(加权平均差[WMD]0.54mg/dL,95%置信区间0.43至0.65,异质性p=0.021;I² 54.2%,n=11项研究)。总血清胆固醇(TC)的WMD为-1.18mg/dL(95%置信区间-1.30至-1.06,异质性p=0.012;I² 63.1%,n=11项研究),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)为0.126mg/dL(95%置信区间0.02至0.22,异质性p=0.231;I² 43.2%,n=11项研究),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)为-0.24mg/dL(95%置信区间-0.35至-0.14,异质性p=0.562;I² 23.1%,n=10项研究),空腹血糖(FBG)为-2.10mg/dL(95%置信区间-2.84至-1.36,异质性p=0.200;I² 42.6%,n=11项研究),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为-0.83%(95%置信区间-1.08至-0.57,异质性p=0.856;I² 20.9%,n=11项研究)。这些发现在敏感性分析中很稳健。
这项荟萃分析表明,BAS治疗可显著改善HDL-C、LDL-C以及包括空腹血糖、HbA1c水平在内的血糖指标,同时使甘油三酯水平恶化。