Child Movement, Activity, and Developmental Health Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, 4745D CCRB, 401 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2569-2583. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0767-2.
Over the past two decades, achievement goal theory (AGT) has been used as a theoretical framework to design and implement motor skill programming in young children.
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effects of AGT in motor skill interventions and programming in children aged 0-12 years.
This systematic literature search was conducted using three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and EBSCOhost. Studies were included if they met the following four inclusion criteria: (1) had an intervention with a gross motor outcome, (2) used an intervention grounded in AGT, (3) included young children (aged 0-12 years), and (4) were written in English. Studies were rated according to methodological reporting quality. All literature searches and reporting were consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol.
A total of 12 studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the sample. All studies reported that AGT motor skill interventions were effective for improving motor skills in young children. Studies varied in regard to intervention groups, duration, dosage, and the personnel responsible for implementing the intervention. None of the included studies met the requirements to be considered as having high methodological quality.
Based on these findings, AGT is an effective theoretical approach for designing and implementing motor skill interventions for young children.
在过去的二十年中，成就目标理论（AGT）已被用作设计和实施幼儿运动技能编程的理论框架。
本系统评价的目的是检验 AGT 在 0-12 岁儿童运动技能干预和编程中的效果。
本系统文献检索使用了三个数据库：Google Scholar、PubMed 和 EBSCOhost。如果符合以下四个纳入标准，则纳入研究：（1）有粗大运动结果的干预，（2）使用基于 AGT 的干预，（3）包括幼儿（0-12 岁），（4）用英语书写。研究根据方法学报告质量进行评分。所有文献检索和报告均符合系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA）协议。
共有 12 项研究符合所有纳入标准并被纳入样本。所有研究均报告 AGT 运动技能干预对改善幼儿运动技能有效。研究在干预组、持续时间、剂量和负责实施干预的人员方面存在差异。纳入的研究均未达到被认为具有高方法学质量的要求。
基于这些发现，AGT 是设计和实施幼儿运动技能干预的有效理论方法。
