• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单知觉决策的注意漂移扩散模型

The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making.

作者信息

Tavares Gabriela, Perona Pietro, Rangel Antonio

机构信息

Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of TechnologyPasadena, CA, United States.

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of TechnologyPasadena, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 24;11:468. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00468. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2017.00468
PMID:28894413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5573732/
Abstract

Perceptual decisions requiring the comparison of spatially distributed stimuli that are fixated sequentially might be influenced by fluctuations in visual attention. We used two psychophysical tasks with human subjects to investigate the extent to which visual attention influences simple perceptual choices, and to test the extent to which the attentional Drift Diffusion Model (aDDM) provides a good computational description of how attention affects the underlying decision processes. We find evidence for sizable attentional choice biases and that the aDDM provides a reasonable quantitative description of the relationship between fluctuations in visual attention, choices and reaction times. We also find that exogenous manipulations of attention induce choice biases consistent with the predictions of the model.

摘要

需要对顺序注视的空间分布刺激进行比较的知觉决策可能会受到视觉注意力波动的影响。我们对人类受试者使用了两项心理物理学任务,以研究视觉注意力在多大程度上影响简单的知觉选择,并测试注意力漂移扩散模型(aDDM)在多大程度上能够很好地计算描述注意力如何影响潜在的决策过程。我们发现了明显的注意力选择偏差的证据,并且aDDM对视觉注意力波动、选择和反应时间之间的关系提供了合理的定量描述。我们还发现,对注意力的外部操纵会引发与模型预测一致的选择偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/e8f59573b5c6/fnins-11-00468-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/512c9b9cdc4b/fnins-11-00468-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/4665508aa1b7/fnins-11-00468-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/821a248547c0/fnins-11-00468-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/19da82e758b4/fnins-11-00468-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/c2fd2ad3198d/fnins-11-00468-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/88fa8742be08/fnins-11-00468-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/c2fe8425020e/fnins-11-00468-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/7f47203ca483/fnins-11-00468-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/e8f59573b5c6/fnins-11-00468-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/512c9b9cdc4b/fnins-11-00468-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/4665508aa1b7/fnins-11-00468-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/821a248547c0/fnins-11-00468-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/19da82e758b4/fnins-11-00468-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/c2fd2ad3198d/fnins-11-00468-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/88fa8742be08/fnins-11-00468-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/c2fe8425020e/fnins-11-00468-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/7f47203ca483/fnins-11-00468-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ae6/5573732/e8f59573b5c6/fnins-11-00468-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making.简单知觉决策的注意漂移扩散模型
Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 24;11:468. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00468. eCollection 2017.
2
The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions.注意力漂移扩散模型可扩展到简单的购买决策。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 13;3:193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193. eCollection 2012.
3
Accounting for the last-sampling bias in perceptual decision-making.考虑最后采样偏差对知觉决策的影响。
Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105049. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.二元属性选择的注意漂移扩散模型。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions.多属性决策中注视与选择的动态计算模型。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jan;130(1):52-70. doi: 10.1037/rev0000350. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.右侧额眼区在价值比较中的因果作用。
Elife. 2021 Nov 15;10:e67477. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67477.
7
Peripheral Visual Information Halves Attentional Choice Biases.外周视觉信息对半分注意选择偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;34(9):984-998. doi: 10.1177/09567976231184878. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice.在偏好选择中,更强的注意力偏差与更高的奖励率有关。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105095. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105095. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.非线性概率加权能够反映序列抽样中的注意偏差。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Oct;129(5):949-975. doi: 10.1037/rev0000304. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.注意力如何影响感知决策:漂移扩散模型参数的单试次脑电图相关性
J Math Psychol. 2017 Feb;76(Pt B):117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in speed-accuracy trade-off influence social decision-making in dyads.速度-准确性权衡中的个体差异会影响二元组中的社会决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20251077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1077. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Considering What We Know and What We Don't Know: Expectations and Confidence Guide Value Integration in Value-Based Decision-Making.考量已知与未知:期望与信心引导基于价值的决策中的价值整合。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jun 25;9:791-813. doi: 10.1162/opmi.a.3. eCollection 2025.
3
Semantic influences on object detection: Drift diffusion modeling provides insights regarding mechanism.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of attention on value integration.注意力对价值整合的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1615-1627. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1340-7.
2
Implications of Visual Attention Phenomena for Models of Preferential Choice.视觉注意现象对偏好选择模型的影响
Decision (Wash D C ). 2016 Oct;3(4):231-253. doi: 10.1037/dec0000049. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.在有噪声的决策过程中,经济非理性是最优的。
语义对目标检测的影响:漂移扩散模型为机制提供了见解。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jun 11;21(6):e1012269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012269. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Manipulating attention facilitates cooperation.操控注意力有助于合作。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 17;3(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00206-9.
5
Spatial Processing Enhancement in the Prefrontal Cortex for Rapid Detection of Valuable Objects.前额叶皮质中用于快速检测有价值物体的空间处理增强。
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 16;45(16):e1549242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1549-24.2025.
6
Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses.腹侧额眶皮质环路介导了来自符号收益和损失的强化计算。
Neuron. 2024 Nov 20;112(22):3782-3795.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
7
Transmission of social bias through observational learning.通过观察学习传递社会偏见。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 28;10(26):eadk2030. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2030.
8
Perceptual Decision Impairments Linked to Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms are Substantially Driven by State-Based Effects.与强迫症状相关的知觉决策损害主要由基于状态的效应驱动。
Comput Psychiatr. 2022 May 12;6(1):79-95. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.87. eCollection 2022.
9
Human behavior in free search online shopping scenarios can be predicted from EEG activation using Hjorth parameters.利用约尔特参数,可从脑电图激活情况预测人们在自由搜索式网上购物场景中的行为。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 10;17:1191213. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1191213. eCollection 2023.
10
Working memory and attention in choice.选择中的工作记忆和注意力。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0284127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284127. eCollection 2023.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 15;113(11):3102-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519157113. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
A Neurocomputational Model of Altruistic Choice and Its Implications.利他选择的神经计算模型及其意义。
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):451-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.031.
5
A neuro-computational model of economic decisions.一种经济决策的神经计算模型。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;114(3):1382-98. doi: 10.1152/jn.00184.2015. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze.通过利用目光注视的动态来影响道德决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):4170-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415250112. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
Neural mechanisms of human perceptual choice under focused and divided attention.注意力集中和分散时人类感知选择的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3485-98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3276-14.2015.
8
Revisiting the evidence for collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making.重新审视感知决策中边界崩溃和紧急信号的证据。
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 11;35(6):2476-84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2410-14.2015.
9
Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making.神经振荡和同步在感知和基于价值的决策中的证据积累中具有不同的支持作用。
Neuron. 2014 May 7;82(3):709-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.014.
10
Serial dependence in visual perception.视觉感知中的序列依赖。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43. doi: 10.1038/nn.3689. Epub 2014 Mar 30.