• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超级识别能力的主观评估:对平民和警察参与者自我报告方法的评估

Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants.

作者信息

Bate Sarah, Dudfield Gavin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.

Dorset Police, UK.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Jan 31;7:e6330. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6330. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.6330
PMID:30723622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6360075/
Abstract

Metacognition about face recognition has been much discussed in the psychological literature. In particular, the use of self-report to identify people with prosopagnosia ("face blindness") has contentiously been debated. However, no study to date has specifically assessed metacognition at the top end of the spectrum. If people with exceptionally proficient face recognition skills ("super-recognizers," SRs) have greater insight into their abilities, self-report instruments may offer an efficient means of reducing candidate lists in SR screening programs. Here, we developed a "super-recognizer questionnaire" (SRQ), calibrated using a top-end civilian sample (Experiment 1). We examined its effectiveness in identifying SRs in pools of police (Experiment 2) and civilian (Experiment 3) participants, using objective face memory and matching tests. Moderate effect sizes in both samples suggest limited insight into face memory and target-present face matching ability, whereas the only predictor of target-absent matching performance across all samples was the number of years that an officer had been in the police force. Because the SRQ and single-item ratings showed little sensitivity in discriminating SRs from typical perceivers in police officers and civilians, we recommend against the use of self-report instruments in SR screening programs.

摘要

关于人脸识别的元认知在心理学文献中已有诸多讨论。特别是,使用自我报告来识别面孔失认症(“脸盲症”)患者一直存在争议。然而,迄今为止尚无研究专门评估该谱系高端的元认知情况。如果具有异常熟练人脸识别技能的人(“超级识别者”,SRs)对自己的能力有更强的洞察力,那么自我报告工具可能会为减少SR筛选项目中的候选名单提供一种有效方法。在此,我们开发了一份“超级识别者问卷”(SRQ),并使用高端平民样本进行校准(实验1)。我们通过客观的面部记忆和匹配测试,检验了该问卷在识别警察(实验2)和平民(实验3)参与者群体中的SRs方面的有效性。两个样本中的中等效应量表明对面部记忆和目标存在时面部匹配能力的洞察力有限,而在所有样本中,目标不存在时匹配表现的唯一预测因素是警察的警龄。由于SRQ和单项评分在区分警察和平民中的SRs与典型感知者时敏感性较低,我们不建议在SR筛选项目中使用自我报告工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699e/6360075/d082a0b28ac9/peerj-07-6330-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699e/6360075/3da0dfbb6d93/peerj-07-6330-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699e/6360075/d082a0b28ac9/peerj-07-6330-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699e/6360075/3da0dfbb6d93/peerj-07-6330-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699e/6360075/d082a0b28ac9/peerj-07-6330-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Subjective assessment for super recognition: an evaluation of self-report methods in civilian and police participants.超级识别能力的主观评估:对平民和警察参与者自我报告方法的评估
PeerJ. 2019 Jan 31;7:e6330. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6330. eCollection 2019.
2
The limits of super recognition: An other-ethnicity effect in individuals with extraordinary face recognition skills.超级识别的局限:具有非凡面部识别能力的个体中的跨种族效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):363-377. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000607. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?人们对自己的面部识别能力有洞察力吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Feb;70(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161058. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Improving forensic perpetrator identification with Super-Recognizers.利用超级识别者提高法医犯罪识别能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2220580120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220580120. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
Facing the facts: Naive participants have only moderate insight into their face recognition and face perception abilities.面对现实:单纯的参与者对自己的面部识别和面部感知能力只有适度的洞察力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):872-881. doi: 10.1177/1747021818776145. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Eye-movement strategies in developmental prosopagnosia and "super" face recognition.发育性面孔失认症与“超级”人脸识别中的眼动策略
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Feb;70(2):201-217. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161059. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Selecting police super-recognisers.选拔警方超级识别员。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0283682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283682. eCollection 2023.
8
Use of Face Information Varies Systematically From Developmental Prosopagnosics to Super-Recognizers.使用面部信息的方式会从发展性面孔失认症患者到超级面孔识别者系统地发生变化。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):300-308. doi: 10.1177/0956797618811338. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Face Recognition by Metropolitan Police Super-Recognisers.伦敦警察厅超级识别者的人脸识别技术
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150036. eCollection 2016.
10
When two fields collide: Identifying "super-recognisers" for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research.当两个领域碰撞:为神经心理学和法医人脸识别研究识别“超级识别者”。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Dec;74(12):2154-2164. doi: 10.1177/17470218211027695. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Normative data of the Italian Famous Face Test.意大利著名面孔测验的常模数据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 3;14(1):15276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66252-1.
2
Forensic facial examiners versus super-recognizers: Evaluating behavior beyond accuracy.法医面部鉴定人员与超级识别者:评估准确性之外的行为。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2022;36(6). doi: 10.1002/acp.4003.
3
Face matching and self-insight: A Registered Report investigating individual differences in metacognitive sensitivity, efficiency, and bias.面部匹配与自我洞察:一项关于元认知敏感性、效率和偏差个体差异的预注册报告研究

本文引用的文献

1
Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks.超级识别者的实际表现:来自面部匹配和面部记忆任务的证据。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):81-91. doi: 10.1002/acp.3170. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
Applied screening tests for the detection of superior face recognition.应用筛查测试以检测卓越的人脸识别能力。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Jun 27;3:22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0116-5. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Apr;78(4):660-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218241254209. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Face matching and metacognition: investigating individual differences and a training intervention.面部匹配和元认知:探究个体差异和训练干预。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 25;11:e14821. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14821. eCollection 2023.
5
When two fields collide: Identifying "super-recognisers" for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research.当两个领域碰撞:为神经心理学和法医人脸识别研究识别“超级识别者”。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Dec;74(12):2154-2164. doi: 10.1177/17470218211027695. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
When experience does not promote expertise: security professionals fail to detect low prevalence fake IDs.当经验不能促进专业知识的发展时:安全专业人员无法检测到低流行度的假 ID。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Apr 1;6(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00288-z.
7
Associations between self-reported and objective face recognition abilities are only evident in above- and below-average recognisers.自我报告的面部识别能力与客观面部识别能力之间的关联仅在高于和低于平均水平的识别者中明显。
PeerJ. 2021 Jan 11;9:e10629. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10629. eCollection 2021.
8
UNSW Face Test: A screening tool for super-recognizers.新南威尔士大学人脸识别测试:超级人脸识别者的筛查工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0241747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241747. eCollection 2020.
9
Enhanced Matching of Children's Faces in "Super-Recognisers" But Not High-Contact Controls.“超级识别者”中儿童面部的匹配能力增强,但高接触对照组则不然。
Iperception. 2020 Jul 26;11(4):2041669520944420. doi: 10.1177/2041669520944420. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
10
Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.两种具有挑战性的生态条件下面部匹配测试的常模数据。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Feb 19;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0205-0.
法医鉴定人、超级识别者和人脸识别算法的人脸识别准确率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):6171-6176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721355115. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
Facing the facts: Naive participants have only moderate insight into their face recognition and face perception abilities.面对现实:单纯的参与者对自己的面部识别和面部感知能力只有适度的洞察力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):872-881. doi: 10.1177/1747021818776145. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Identifying Hallmark Symptoms of Developmental Prosopagnosia for Non-Experts.识别非专业人士发育性面孔失认症的标志性症状。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20089-7.
6
Super-recognition in development: A case study of an adolescent with extraordinary face recognition skills.发展过程中的超级识别能力:一名具有非凡人脸识别技能的青少年的案例研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 Sep;34(6):357-376. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1402755. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Robust associations between the 20-item prosopagnosia index and the Cambridge Face Memory Test in the general population.在普通人群中,20项面孔失认症指数与剑桥面孔记忆测试之间存在显著关联。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 1;4(3):160923. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160923. eCollection 2017 Mar.
8
Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults.在大量英国年轻成年人样本中检测卓越的人脸识别技能。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 22;7:1378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01378. eCollection 2016.
9
An in-depth cognitive examination of individuals with superior face recognition skills.对具有卓越面部识别技能的个体进行深入的认知检查。
Cortex. 2016 Sep;82:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 15.
10
Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?人们对自己的面部识别能力有洞察力吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Feb;70(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161058. Epub 2016 Mar 23.