Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada.
The Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, 101 Diefenbaker Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B8, Canada.
Transgenic Res. 2019 Apr;28(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety.
农业创新无处不在。然而,尽管 20 世纪的植物育种取得了成功,但 21 世纪迎来了一系列挑战,而过去一个世纪的解决方案不太可能解决这些问题。然而,持续的研究和多个学科的融合催生了新的育种技术(NBT),如基因组编辑,为解决其中一些问题提供了新的机会。在这里,我们展示了一项关于与通过基因改造(GM)和传统育种开发的作物相比,基因组编辑作物的附加潜在益处的专家调查结果。总的来说,调查结果显示,专家们一致认为,与其他替代方案相比,基因组编辑作物在农艺性能和产品质量方面具有增强的优势。大多数专家表示,健康和安全法规,其次是出口市场、消费者和媒体,在决定包括基因组编辑在内的 NBT 将在农业中何处以及如何开发和使用方面发挥主要作用。在欧洲联盟法院作出裁决后,需要进一步研究以衡量专家意见,该裁决规定,即使最终品种中不存在外源 DNA,也应按照与 GM 作物相同的方式对特定部位诱变育种技术进行监管。