Suppr超能文献

基因编辑作物的好处:专家意见。

Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada.

The Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, 101 Diefenbaker Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B8, Canada.

出版信息

Transgenic Res. 2019 Apr;28(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Abstract

Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety.

摘要

农业创新无处不在。然而,尽管 20 世纪的植物育种取得了成功,但 21 世纪迎来了一系列挑战,而过去一个世纪的解决方案不太可能解决这些问题。然而,持续的研究和多个学科的融合催生了新的育种技术(NBT),如基因组编辑,为解决其中一些问题提供了新的机会。在这里,我们展示了一项关于与通过基因改造(GM)和传统育种开发的作物相比,基因组编辑作物的附加潜在益处的专家调查结果。总的来说,调查结果显示,专家们一致认为,与其他替代方案相比,基因组编辑作物在农艺性能和产品质量方面具有增强的优势。大多数专家表示,健康和安全法规,其次是出口市场、消费者和媒体,在决定包括基因组编辑在内的 NBT 将在农业中何处以及如何开发和使用方面发挥主要作用。在欧洲联盟法院作出裁决后,需要进一步研究以衡量专家意见,该裁决规定,即使最终品种中不存在外源 DNA,也应按照与 GM 作物相同的方式对特定部位诱变育种技术进行监管。

相似文献

1
Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.基因编辑作物的好处:专家意见。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Apr;28(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.加拿大对基因编辑作物的监管视角。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.阿根廷基因编辑的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2.

引用本文的文献

3
Harnessing spp. for sustainable plant crop protection.利用物种实现可持续的植物作物保护。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 21;15:1485197. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1485197. eCollection 2024.
6
Costa Rican consumer perceptions of gene-editing.哥斯达黎加消费者对基因编辑的认知。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 16;9(8):e19173. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19173. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Genome editing in maize: Toward improving complex traits in a global crop.玉米中的基因组编辑:致力于改良全球作物的复杂性状。
Genet Mol Biol. 2023 Mar 3;46(1 Suppl 1):e20220217. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0217. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.新育种技术周围的监管不确定性。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 4;9:1291. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01291. eCollection 2018.
6
Progress and prospects in plant genome editing.植物基因组编辑的进展与展望。
Nat Plants. 2017 Jul 31;3:17107. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.107.
7
Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.作物的基因组编辑:粮食安全的新机遇。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270489. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.加拿大对基因编辑作物的监管视角。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验