Rouhi Narges, Gorji Hasan Abolghasem, Maleki Mohammadreza
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Feb 15;8:44. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_201_18. eCollection 2019.
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) play a significant role to provide humanitarian services in natural hazards. However, few studies have been conducted on the coordination models of NGOs. Using these models, NGOs are expected to act along with other agencies to provide unified and effective humanitarian's services. The present study aimed to identify the published coordination models of NGOs.
This systematic review was conducted from October to November 2017. Electronic source, including PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest Research Library, and Scopus were examined. All English articles published in journals or presented at conferences were included in the study. Nonjournal and irrelevant articles were excluded from the study. Furthermore, papers which were not available as a full text and published in languages other than English were also excluded. Thematic analysis technique was used to analyze the articles.
From 871 documents which captured in initial search, only 7 studies identified as eligible articles for extract 8 coordination models of NGOs in disasters and emergencies including: (1) Sphere project, (2) Cluster approach, (3) Code of conduct, (4) Decentralized approach, (5) National Disaster Response Framework, (6) Conceptual integrated NGO collaboration framework for community postdisaster reconstruction, (7) Model of temporal coordination of disaster response activities, and (8) Collabit application.
This systematic review identified eight proposed coordination models that have been implemented internationally, nationally, and locally in natural hazards. However, these models are not enough, and there are some gaps between what is it and what should be. More effective and efficient models and strategies are needed to increase the effectiveness of coordination activities at all levels of community. These results should serve policy-makers and administrators of NGOs delivering humanitarian services during and postnatural hazards to choose from a number of options on how to coordinate their efforts.
非政府组织在自然灾害中提供人道主义服务方面发挥着重要作用。然而,关于非政府组织协调模式的研究却很少。通过运用这些模式,期望非政府组织能与其他机构协同行动,以提供统一且有效的人道主义服务。本研究旨在确定已发表的非政府组织协调模式。
本系统综述于2017年10月至11月进行。对包括PubMed、科学网、ProQuest研究图书馆和Scopus在内的电子资源进行了检索。研究纳入了所有在期刊上发表或在会议上展示的英文文章。非期刊文章和不相关文章被排除在研究之外。此外,无法获取全文以及用非英语语言发表的论文也被排除。采用主题分析法对文章进行分析。
在初步检索到的871篇文献中,仅有7项研究被确定为符合条件的文章,从中提取出非政府组织在灾害和紧急情况下的8种协调模式,包括:(1)《救灾标准》项目;(2)群组方法;(3)行为准则;(4)分散式方法;(5)国家灾害应对框架;(6)社区灾后重建非政府组织概念性综合协作框架;(7)灾害应对活动的时间协调模式;(8)Collabit应用程序。
本系统综述确定了8种已在国际、国家和地方层面针对自然灾害实施过的协调模式。然而,这些模式并不够完善,实际情况与应达到的状态之间存在一些差距。需要更有效和高效的模式及策略,以提高社区各级协调活动的成效。这些结果应为在自然灾害期间及灾后提供人道主义服务的非政府组织的政策制定者和管理人员提供多种协调工作的选择。