Allier C, Hervé L, Mandula O, Blandin P, Usson Y, Savatier J, Monneret S, Morales S
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS-LSIV, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
TIMC-IMAG, Uni. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS UMR 5525, France.
Biomed Opt Express. 2019 May 14;10(6):2768-2783. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.002768. eCollection 2019 Jun 1.
The Quantitative phase imaging methods have several advantages when it comes to monitoring cultures of adherent mammalian cells. Because of low photo-toxicity and no need for staining, we can follow cells in a minimally invasive way over a long period of time. The ability to measure the optical path difference in a quantitative manner allows the measurement of the cell dry mass, an important metric for studying the growth kinetics of mammalian cells. Here we present and compare cell measurements obtained with three different techniques: digital holographic microscopy, lens-free microscopy and quadriwave lateral sheering interferometry. We report a linear relationship between optical volume density values measured with these different techniques and estimate the precisions of this measurement for the different individual instruments.
在监测贴壁哺乳动物细胞培养时,定量相成像方法具有多个优点。由于光毒性低且无需染色,我们能够以微创方式长时间跟踪细胞。以定量方式测量光程差的能力使得能够测量细胞干质量,这是研究哺乳动物细胞生长动力学的一个重要指标。在此,我们展示并比较了用三种不同技术获得的细胞测量结果:数字全息显微镜、无透镜显微镜和四波横向剪切干涉测量法。我们报告了用这些不同技术测量的光学体积密度值之间的线性关系,并估计了不同单个仪器该测量的精度。