Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 30;374(1782):20180331. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0331. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
Predicting pathogen spillover requires counting spillover events and aligning such counts with process-related covariates for each spillover event. How can we connect our analysis of spillover counts to simple, mechanistic models of pathogens jumping from reservoir hosts to recipient hosts? We illustrate how the pathways to pathogen spillover can be represented as a directed graph connecting reservoir hosts and recipient hosts and the number of spillover events modelled as a percolation of infectious units along that graph. Percolation models of pathogen spillover formalize popular intuition and management concepts for pathogen spillover, such as the inextricably multilevel nature of cross-species transmission, the impact of covariance between processes such as pathogen shedding and human susceptibility on spillover risk, and the assumptions under which the effect of a management intervention targeting one process, such as persistence of vectors, will translate to an equal effect on the overall spillover risk. Percolation models also link statistical analysis of spillover event datasets with a mechanistic model of spillover. Linear models, one might construct for process-specific parameters, such as the log-rate of shedding from one of several alternative reservoirs, yield a nonlinear model of the log-rate of spillover. The resulting nonlinearity is approximately piecewise linear with major impacts on statistical inferences of the importance of process-specific covariates such as vector density. We recommend that statistical analysis of spillover datasets use piecewise linear models, such as generalized additive models, regression clustering or ensembles of linear models, to capture the piecewise linearity expected from percolation models. We discuss the implications of our findings for predictions of spillover risk beyond the range of observed covariates, a major challenge of forecasting spillover risk in the Anthropocene. This article is part of the theme issue 'Dynamic and integrative approaches to understanding pathogen spillover'.
预测病原体溢出需要计算溢出事件,并为每个溢出事件对齐与过程相关的协变量。我们如何将溢出事件计数的分析与病原体从储存宿主跳跃到接受宿主的简单、机械模型联系起来?我们说明了病原体溢出的途径如何表示为连接储存宿主和接受宿主的有向图,以及将溢出事件建模为沿该图的传染性单位的渗滤。病原体溢出的渗滤模型形式化了病原体溢出的流行直觉和管理概念,例如跨物种传播的不可分割的多层次性质、病原体脱落和人类易感性等过程之间的协方差对溢出风险的影响,以及在针对一种过程(例如,载体的持久性)的管理干预的效果将如何转化为对整体溢出风险的同等影响的假设。渗滤模型还将溢出事件数据集的统计分析与溢出的机械模型联系起来。人们可能会为特定过程(例如,从几种替代储层之一的脱落的对数速率)构建线性模型,从而得到溢出的对数速率的非线性模型。由此产生的非线性性大约是分段线性的,对统计推断具有重大影响,例如载体密度等特定过程协变量的重要性。我们建议对溢出数据集的统计分析使用分段线性模型,例如广义加性模型、回归聚类或线性模型的集合,以捕获从渗滤模型中预期的分段线性。我们讨论了我们的发现对预测溢出风险的影响超出了观察到的协变量范围,这是人类世预测溢出风险的主要挑战。本文是主题问题“理解病原体溢出的动态和综合方法”的一部分。