Suppr超能文献

在白内障患者中,前房深度和眼轴长度测量差异对晶状体厚度评估的影响:两种检查方法的比较。

Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, 215006, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of lens thickness (LT) measurements made by contact A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 as well as the influence of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement differences on LT measurement in cataract patients in the two techniques.

METHODS

1247 cataract patients (1247 eyes) participated in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Ocular biometric measurements were performed with Lenstar LS900 and A-scan ultrasonography respectively, and the measured results of AL, ACD and LT were compared using Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Bland-Altman analyses showed poor agreement between the A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900 in measuring AL and ACD. The average difference of LT was 0.01 mm; the consistency limit was - 0.86 mm, 0.88 mm; and 95.27% of datapoints were within the 95% consistency limit. The consistency of LT measurements between the two techniques was poor for those subjects whose ACD or AL values were beyond the 95% consistency limit. Among the subjects whose AL or ACD values measured by A-scan ultrasonography were greater than those measured by Lenstar LS900, 93.33% of them were within the 95% consistency limit, suggesting that the consistency of LT measurement between the two techniques was poor. Of patients whose ACD or AL measured by A-scan ultrasonography were smaller than that of Lenstar LS900, 96.01% of them were within the 95% consistency limit.

CONCLUSIONS

There was good agreement of the LT measurements between A-scan ultrasonography and Lenstar LS900, except for the axis deviating from the apparent axis during A-scan ultrasonography. If this error can be avoided, A-scan ultrasonography can replace Lenstar LS900 in LT measurement in cataract patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨接触式 A 超超声与 Lenstar LS900 测量晶状体厚度(LT)的一致性,以及前房深度(ACD)和眼轴长度(AL)测量值差异对两种技术中白内障患者 LT 测量值的影响。

方法

本回顾性横断面研究纳入了 1247 例(1247 只眼)白内障患者。分别使用 Lenstar LS900 和 A 超进行眼生物测量,采用 Pearson 相关系数(r)和 Bland-Altman 分析比较 AL、ACD 和 LT 的测量结果。

结果

Bland-Altman 分析显示,A 超与 Lenstar LS900 在测量 AL 和 ACD 方面一致性较差。LT 的平均差值为 0.01mm;一致性限为-0.86mm,0.88mm;95.27%的数据点在 95%一致性限内。对于 ACD 或 AL 值超出 95%一致性限的患者,两种技术测量 LT 的一致性较差。在 A 超测量的 AL 或 ACD 值大于 Lenstar LS900 测量值的患者中,93.33%的患者在 95%一致性限内,提示两种技术测量 LT 的一致性较差。在 A 超测量的 ACD 或 AL 值小于 Lenstar LS900 的患者中,96.01%的患者在 95%一致性限内。

结论

A 超与 Lenstar LS900 测量 LT 的一致性较好,但 A 超测量时眼球轴位与实际轴位偏离时除外。如果能避免这种误差,A 超可在白内障患者 LT 测量中替代 Lenstar LS900。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7df2/7720484/9a4c3404a1a5/12886_2020_1754_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验