Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;89(7):681-689. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament characterized in early childhood by distress to novelty and avoidance of unfamiliar people, and it is one of the best-known risk factors for the development of social anxiety. However, nearly 60% of children with BI do not go on to meet criteria for social anxiety disorder. In this review we present an approach to understanding differential developmental trajectories among children with BI. We review research using laboratory-based tasks that isolate specific attention processes that enhance versus mitigate risk for social anxiety among behaviorally inhibited children and studies that suggest that BI is associated with heightened detection of novelty or threat. Moreover, stimulus-driven control processes, which we term "automatic control," increase the probability that behaviorally inhibited children display socially reticent behavior and develop social anxiety. In contrast, goal-driven control processes, which we term "planful control," decrease risk for anxiety. We suggest that these three categories of processes (detection, automatic control, and planful control) function together to determine whether behaviorally inhibited children are able to flexibly regulate their initial reactions to novelty, and in turn, decrease risk for social anxiety. Although laboratory-based tasks have identified these processes underlying risk and resilience, the challenge is linking them to the emotions, thoughts, and behaviors of behaviorally inhibited children in real-world contexts.
行为抑制(BI)是一种在儿童早期表现出对新奇事物的痛苦和对陌生人物的回避的气质,它是社交焦虑发展的最佳风险因素之一。然而,近 60%的行为抑制儿童并没有达到社交焦虑障碍的标准。在这篇综述中,我们提出了一种理解行为抑制儿童不同发展轨迹的方法。我们回顾了使用实验室任务的研究,这些任务可以分离出特定的注意过程,这些过程可以增强或减轻行为抑制儿童患社交焦虑的风险,以及研究表明 BI 与对新奇或威胁的敏感性增加有关。此外,我们称之为“自动控制”的刺激驱动控制过程增加了行为抑制儿童表现出社交退缩行为并发展为社交焦虑的可能性。相比之下,我们称之为“计划控制”的目标驱动控制过程降低了焦虑的风险。我们认为,这三个类别的过程(检测、自动控制和计划控制)共同作用,决定了行为抑制儿童是否能够灵活调节对新奇事物的最初反应,并降低社交焦虑的风险。尽管基于实验室的任务已经确定了这些风险和弹性的潜在过程,但挑战在于将它们与行为抑制儿童在现实世界环境中的情绪、思想和行为联系起来。