Huazhong Agricultural University, College of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, No.1 Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Rush University Medical Center, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Mar 4;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00794-8.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified by genome-wide association studies only explain part of the heritability of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Epistasis has been considered as one of the main causes of "missing heritability" in AD.
We performed genome-wide epistasis screening (N = 10,389) for the clinical diagnosis of AD using three popularly adopted methods. Subsequent analyses were performed to eliminate spurious associations caused by possible confounding factors. Then, candidate genetic interactions were examined for their co-expression in the brains of AD patients and analyzed for their association with intermediate AD phenotypes. Moreover, a new approach was developed to compile the epistasis risk factors into an epistasis risk score (ERS) based on multifactor dimensional reduction. Two independent datasets were used to evaluate the feasibility of ERSs in AD risk prediction.
We identified 2 candidate genetic interactions with P < 0.05 (RAMP3-SEMA3A and NSMCE1-DGKE/C17orf67) and another 5 genetic interactions with P < 0.1. Co-expression between the identified interactions supported the existence of possible biological interactions underlying the observed statistical significance. Further association of candidate interactions with intermediate phenotypes helps explain the mechanisms of neuropathological alterations involved in AD. Importantly, we found that ERSs can identify high-risk individuals showing earlier onset of AD. Combined risk scores of SNPs and SNP-SNP interactions showed slightly but steadily increased AUC in predicting the clinical status of AD.
In summary, we performed a genome-wide epistasis analysis to identify novel genetic interactions potentially implicated in AD. We found that ERS can serve as an indicator of the genetic risk of AD.
全基因组关联研究鉴定的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)仅能解释阿尔茨海默病(AD)部分遗传率。上位性已被认为是 AD 中“遗传缺失”的主要原因之一。
我们使用三种常用方法,针对 AD 的临床诊断进行了全基因组上位性筛选(N=10389)。随后的分析消除了可能由混杂因素引起的虚假关联。然后,对候选遗传相互作用进行了共表达分析,以检查它们与 AD 患者大脑中的中间 AD 表型的关联。此外,开发了一种新方法,基于多因素维度缩减将上位性风险因素编译为上位性风险评分(ERS)。使用两个独立的数据集来评估 ERS 在 AD 风险预测中的可行性。
我们鉴定出了 2 个具有 P<0.05 的候选遗传相互作用(RAMP3-SEMA3A 和 NSMCE1-DGKE/C17orf67)和另外 5 个具有 P<0.1 的遗传相互作用。鉴定出的相互作用之间的共表达支持了观察到的统计学显著意义背后可能存在的生物学相互作用的存在。候选相互作用与中间表型的进一步关联有助于解释 AD 涉及的神经病理改变的机制。重要的是,我们发现 ERS 可以识别出具有 AD 发病较早的高危个体。SNP 和 SNP-SNP 相互作用的组合风险评分在预测 AD 的临床状态时,AUC 略有但稳步增加。
总之,我们进行了全基因组上位性分析,以鉴定潜在参与 AD 的新型遗传相互作用。我们发现 ERS 可以作为 AD 遗传风险的指标。