Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dementia Research Center, University College London, London, UK.
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1236-1247. doi: 10.1177/10731911211008234. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
The Social Norms Questionnaire-Dutch version (SNQ-NL) measures the ability to understand and identify social boundaries. We examined the psychometric characteristics of the SNQ-NL and its ability to differentiate between patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; = 23), Alzheimer's dementia (AD; = 26), chronic psychiatric disorders ( = 27), and control participants ( = 92). Between-group differences in the Total score, Break errors, and Overadhere errors were examined and associations with demographic variables and other cognitive functions were explored. Results showed that the SNQ-NL Total Score and Break errors differed between patients with AD and bvFTD, but not between patients with bvFTD and psychiatric disorders. Modest correlations with age, sex, and education were observed. The SNQ-NL Total score and Break errors correlated significantly with emotion recognition and verbal fluency but not with processing speed or mental flexibility. In conclusion, the SNQ-NL has sufficient construct validity and can be used to investigate knowledge of social norms in clinical populations.
《社会规范问卷-荷兰语版》(SNQ-NL)用于衡量理解和识别社会界限的能力。我们考察了 SNQ-NL 的心理测量学特征及其区分行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD;n = 23)、阿尔茨海默病(AD;n = 26)、慢性精神障碍(n = 27)和对照组(n = 92)的能力。比较了总分、中断错误和过度遵守错误在不同组间的差异,并探讨了与人口统计学变量和其他认知功能的关联。结果表明,AD 患者与 bvFTD 患者的 SNQ-NL 总分和中断错误存在差异,但 bvFTD 患者与精神障碍患者之间没有差异。观察到与年龄、性别和教育程度的适度相关性。SNQ-NL 总分和中断错误与情绪识别和言语流畅性显著相关,但与加工速度或心理灵活性无关。总之,SNQ-NL 具有足够的结构有效性,可用于调查临床人群对社会规范的了解。