• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习通过对重症患者通气参数的分析预测死亡率:多中心验证

Machine learning predicts mortality based on analysis of ventilation parameters of critically ill patients: multi-centre validation.

作者信息

Mamandipoor Behrooz, Frutos-Vivar Fernando, Peñuelas Oscar, Rezar Richard, Raymondos Konstantinos, Muriel Alfonso, Du Bin, Thille Arnaud W, Ríos Fernando, González Marco, Del-Sorbo Lorenzo, Del Carmen Marín Maria, Pinheiro Bruno Valle, Soares Marco Antonio, Nin Nicolas, Maggiore Salvatore M, Bersten Andrew, Kelm Malte, Bruno Raphael Romano, Amin Pravin, Cakar Nahit, Suh Gee Young, Abroug Fekri, Jibaja Manuel, Matamis Dimitros, Zeggwagh Amine Ali, Sutherasan Yuda, Anzueto Antonio, Wernly Bernhard, Esteban Andrés, Jung Christian, Osmani Venet

机构信息

Fondazione Bruno Kessler Research Institute, Trento, Italy.

Hospital Universitario de Getafe & Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 7;21(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01506-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01506-w
PMID:33962603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8102841/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is a complex and central treatment process in the care of critically ill patients. It influences acid-base balance and can also cause prognostically relevant biotrauma by generating forces and liberating reactive oxygen species, negatively affecting outcomes. In this work we evaluate the use of a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) modelling to predict outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients, using standard mechanical ventilation parameters.

METHODS

We performed our analysis on VENTILA dataset, an observational, prospective, international, multi-centre study, performed to investigate the effect of baseline characteristics and management changes over time on the all-cause mortality rate in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. Our cohort includes 12,596 adult patients older than 18, associated with 12,755 distinct admissions in ICUs across 37 countries and receiving invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation. We carry out four different analysis. Initially we select typical mechanical ventilation parameters and evaluate the machine learning model on both, the overall cohort and a subgroup of patients admitted with respiratory disorders. Furthermore, we carry out sensitivity analysis to evaluate whether inclusion of variables related to the function of other organs, improve the predictive performance of the model for both the overall cohort as well as the subgroup of patients with respiratory disorders.

RESULTS

Predictive performance of RNN-based model was higher with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) of 0.72 (± 0.01) and Average Precision (AP) of 0.57 (± 0.01) in comparison to RF and LR for the overall patient dataset. Higher predictive performance was recorded in the subgroup of patients admitted with respiratory disorders with AUC of 0.75 (± 0.02) and AP of 0.65 (± 0.03). Inclusion of function of other organs further improved the performance to AUC of 0.79 (± 0.01) and AP 0.68 (± 0.02) for the overall patient dataset and AUC of 0.79 (± 0.01) and AP 0.72 (± 0.02) for the subgroup with respiratory disorders.

CONCLUSION

The RNN-based model demonstrated better performance than RF and LR in patients in mechanical ventilation and its subgroup admitted with respiratory disorders. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate whether it impacts decision-making and patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02731898 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02731898 ), prospectively registered on April 8, 2016.

摘要

背景

机械通气(MV)是危重症患者护理中一个复杂且核心的治疗过程。它会影响酸碱平衡,还可通过产生作用力和释放活性氧引发具有预后相关性的生物创伤,对治疗结果产生负面影响。在本研究中,我们评估了使用循环神经网络(RNN)模型,利用标准机械通气参数来预测机械通气患者的治疗结果。

方法

我们对VENTILA数据集进行分析,这是一项观察性、前瞻性、国际性、多中心研究,旨在调查基线特征和随时间的管理变化对ICU中机械通气患者全因死亡率的影响。我们的队列包括12,596名年龄超过18岁的成年患者,涉及37个国家ICU中的12,755次不同入院,且接受有创和无创机械通气。我们进行了四项不同的分析。最初,我们选择典型的机械通气参数,并在整个队列以及因呼吸系统疾病入院的患者亚组中评估机器学习模型。此外,我们进行敏感性分析,以评估纳入与其他器官功能相关的变量是否能提高模型对整个队列以及呼吸系统疾病患者亚组的预测性能。

结果

与随机森林(RF)和逻辑回归(LR)相比,基于RNN的模型在整个患者数据集中的预测性能更高,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC曲线下面积,AUC)为0.72(±0.01),平均精度(AP)为0.57(±0.01)。在因呼吸系统疾病入院的患者亚组中记录到更高的预测性能,AUC为0.75(±0.02),AP为0.65(±0.03)。纳入其他器官功能进一步将整个患者数据集的性能提高到AUC为0.79(±0.01),AP为0.68(±0.02),将呼吸系统疾病亚组的性能提高到AUC为0.79(±0.01),AP为0.72(±0.02)。

结论

基于RNN的模型在机械通气患者及其因呼吸系统疾病入院的亚组中表现出比RF和LR更好的性能。需要进行临床研究来评估其是否会影响决策和患者治疗结果。

试验注册

NCT02731898(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02731898),于2016年4月8日进行前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/bde475ff73ab/12911_2021_1506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/f491bef72806/12911_2021_1506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/48eec9b7a8c9/12911_2021_1506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/ffcd8098c98d/12911_2021_1506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/8f42bc3baa59/12911_2021_1506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/bde475ff73ab/12911_2021_1506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/f491bef72806/12911_2021_1506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/48eec9b7a8c9/12911_2021_1506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/ffcd8098c98d/12911_2021_1506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/8f42bc3baa59/12911_2021_1506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8103597/bde475ff73ab/12911_2021_1506_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning predicts mortality based on analysis of ventilation parameters of critically ill patients: multi-centre validation.机器学习通过对重症患者通气参数的分析预测死亡率:多中心验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 7;21(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01506-w.
2
Five novel clinical phenotypes for critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: a retrospective and multi database study.重症监护病房机械通气危重症患者的五种新的临床表型:回顾性和多数据库研究。
Respir Res. 2020 Dec 10;21(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01588-6.
3
Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Ventilator Settings for Patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Retrospective Study.强化学习优化有创机械通气患者呼吸机设置:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 16;26:e44494. doi: 10.2196/44494.
4
Early prediction of noninvasive ventilation failure after extubation: development and validation of a machine-learning model.拔管后无创通气失败的早期预测:机器学习模型的建立与验证。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02096-7.
5
Machine learning predicts the short-term requirement for invasive ventilation among Australian critically ill COVID-19 patients.机器学习预测澳大利亚危重症 COVID-19 患者短期需要有创通气。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276509. eCollection 2022.
6
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
7
Easy prognostic assessment of concomitant organ failure in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.机械通气危重症患者合并器官衰竭的简易预后评估。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;70:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Prediction of extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients: Development and validation of the Extubation Predictive Score (ExPreS).机械通气患者拔管结局预测:拔管预测评分(ExPreS)的建立和验证。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248868. eCollection 2021.
9
A novel machine learning model to predict respiratory failure and invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19.一种新型机器学习模型,用于预测 COVID-19 危重症患者呼吸衰竭和有创机械通气。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14758-x.
10
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach.创伤性脑损伤机械通气患者住院死亡率的预测:机器学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01363-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of non-invasive ventilation before prehospital emergency anesthesia in trauma - a cohort analysis with machine learning.创伤患者院前紧急麻醉前无创通气的应用——一项基于机器学习的队列分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 3;33(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01350-1.
2
Automated mechanical ventilator design and analysis using neural network.基于神经网络的自动机械通气机设计与分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87946-0.
3
Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Patients with Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning predicts mortality in septic patients using only routinely available ABG variables: a multi-centre evaluation.机器学习仅使用常规 ABG 变量预测脓毒症患者的死亡率:一项多中心评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104312. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Mechanical ventilation in Spain, 1998-2016: Epidemiology and outcomes.西班牙 1998-2016 年机械通气的流行病学和结局。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan-Feb;45(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Benchmarking machine learning models on multi-centre eICU critical care dataset.
人工智能在需要机械通气的呼吸衰竭患者管理中的应用:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 11;13(24):7535. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247535.
4
A machine learning-based prediction of hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.基于机器学习的机械通气 ICU 患者院内死亡率预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0309383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309383. eCollection 2024.
5
A systematic review of machine learning models for management, prediction and classification of ARDS.机器学习模型在 ARDS 管理、预测和分类中的系统评价。
Respir Res. 2024 Jun 4;25(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02834-x.
6
Using time-course as an essential factor to accurately predict sepsis-associated mortality among patients with suspected sepsis.将时间进程作为一个重要因素,以准确预测疑似脓毒症患者的脓毒症相关死亡率。
Biomed J. 2024 Jun;47(3):100632. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100632. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Machine learning predicts lung recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome using single lung CT scan.机器学习利用单次肺部CT扫描预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的肺复张情况。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01154-5.
8
A Survey on Medical Explainable AI (XAI): Recent Progress, Explainability Approach, Human Interaction and Scoring System.医学可解释人工智能(XAI)调查:最新进展、可解释性方法、人机交互和评分系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;22(20):8068. doi: 10.3390/s22208068.
9
Multilayer perceptron neural network model development for mechanical ventilator parameters prediction by real time system learning.基于实时系统学习的机械通气参数预测多层感知器神经网络模型开发
Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022 Jan;71:103170. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103170. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
10
Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的个性化机械通气。
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 16;25(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03686-3.
基于多中心 eICU 重症监护数据集的机器学习模型基准测试。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235424. eCollection 2020.
4
Blood Lactate Concentration Prediction in Critical Care.重症监护中的血乳酸浓度预测
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:73-77. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200125.
5
Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine.人工智能在医学中的可归因性与可解释性。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):e1312. doi: 10.1002/widm.1312. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Machine Learning for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine: A Narrative Review.机器学习在肺与重症医学中的应用:一篇综述
Pulm Ther. 2020 Jun;6(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00110-z. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia using electronic nose sensor array signals: solutions to improve the application of machine learning in respiratory research.使用电子鼻传感器阵列信号诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎:解决机器学习在呼吸研究中应用的问题。
Respir Res. 2020 Feb 7;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-1285-6.
8
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
9
Use of machine learning to analyse routinely collected intensive care unit data: a systematic review.运用机器学习分析常规收集的重症监护病房数据:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2019 Aug 22;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2564-9.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.