• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于神经网络的患者模型预测双语失语症的语言治疗反应。

Predicting language treatment response in bilingual aphasia using neural network-based patient models.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 May 18;11(1):10497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89443-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-89443-6
PMID:34006902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8131385/
Abstract

Predicting language therapy outcomes in bilinguals with aphasia (BWA) remains challenging due to the multiple pre- and poststroke factors that determine the deficits and recovery of their two languages. Computational models that simulate language impairment and treatment outcomes in BWA can help predict therapy response and identify the optimal language for treatment. Here we used the BiLex computational model to simulate the behavioral profile of language deficits and treatment response of a retrospective sample of 13 Spanish-English BWA who received therapy in one of their languages. Specifically, we simulated their prestroke naming ability and poststroke naming impairment in each language, and their treatment response in the treated and the untreated language. BiLex predicted treatment effects accurately and robustly in the treated language and captured different degrees of cross-language generalization in the untreated language in BWA. Our cross-validation approach further demonstrated that BiLex generalizes to predict treatment response for patients whose data were not used in model training. These findings support the potential of BiLex to predict therapy outcomes for BWA and suggest that computational modeling may be helpful to guide individually tailored rehabilitation plans for this population.

摘要

由于决定双语失语症患者(BWA)两种语言的缺陷和恢复的多种中风前和中风后因素,预测语言治疗结果仍然具有挑战性。模拟 BWA 语言损伤和治疗结果的计算模型可以帮助预测治疗反应并确定最佳治疗语言。在这里,我们使用 BiLex 计算模型来模拟 13 名接受其中一种语言治疗的西班牙-英语 BWA 的回顾性样本的语言缺陷和治疗反应的行为特征。具体来说,我们模拟了他们中风前的命名能力和中风后的命名障碍,以及他们在治疗和未治疗语言中的治疗反应。BiLex 在治疗语言中准确而稳健地预测了治疗效果,并在 BWA 的未治疗语言中捕捉到了不同程度的跨语言泛化。我们的交叉验证方法进一步表明,BiLex 可以推广到预测未用于模型训练的患者的治疗反应。这些发现支持 BiLex 预测 BWA 治疗结果的潜力,并表明计算模型可能有助于为该人群制定个性化的康复计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/d175dcf6d80b/41598_2021_89443_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/9af9131260b6/41598_2021_89443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/fed16bfa58e1/41598_2021_89443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/5d7b367a06fc/41598_2021_89443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/d99784cdc62f/41598_2021_89443_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/47721f78bf48/41598_2021_89443_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/b37252a9f8aa/41598_2021_89443_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/d175dcf6d80b/41598_2021_89443_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/9af9131260b6/41598_2021_89443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/fed16bfa58e1/41598_2021_89443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/5d7b367a06fc/41598_2021_89443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/d99784cdc62f/41598_2021_89443_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/47721f78bf48/41598_2021_89443_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/b37252a9f8aa/41598_2021_89443_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f5/8131385/d175dcf6d80b/41598_2021_89443_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting language treatment response in bilingual aphasia using neural network-based patient models.基于神经网络的患者模型预测双语失语症的语言治疗反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 18;11(1):10497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89443-6.
2
Predicting treatment outcomes for bilinguals with aphasia using computational modeling: Study protocol for the PROCoM randomised controlled trial.使用计算模型预测双语失语症患者的治疗结果:PROCoM随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e040495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040495.
3
Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia.语义命名疗法对双语失语症跨语言泛化的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Aug;49(4):729-48. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053).
4
The influence of prestroke proficiency on poststroke lexical-semantic performance in bilingual aphasia.卒中前语言能力对双语失语症患者卒中后词汇语义表现的影响。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(10):1223-1240. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1666082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
BiLex: A computational approach to the effects of age of acquisition and language exposure on bilingual lexical access.比莱克斯:一种计算方法,用于研究习得年龄和语言接触对双语词汇通达的影响。
Brain Lang. 2019 Aug;195:104643. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104643. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Therapy for naming difficulties in bilingual aphasia: which language benefits?双语失语症命名困难的治疗:哪种语言受益?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):48-62. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.484845. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
7
A theoretical account of lexical and semantic naming deficits in bilingual aphasia.双语失语症中词汇和语义命名缺陷的理论解释。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Aug;56(4):1314-27. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0091). Epub 2013 Jul 1.
8
Asymmetric inhibitory treatment effects in multilingual aphasia.多语失语症中的非对称抑制治疗效果。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):564-77. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.878692. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
9
Significance of speech production errors on cross-linguistic processing in Sepedi-English individuals with bilingual aphasia: a case series analysis.双语失语症的塞佩迪语-英语个体言语产生错误对跨语言加工的意义:一项病例系列分析
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 May;26(4):294-306. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1593612. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
10
The Role of the Cognitive Control System in Recovery from Bilingual Aphasia: A Multiple Single-Case fMRI Study.认知控制系统在双语失语症恢复中的作用:一项多单病例功能磁共振成像研究
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:8797086. doi: 10.1155/2016/8797086. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
An Introduction to Machine Learning for Speech-Language Pathologists: Concepts, Terminology, and Emerging Applications.面向言语语言病理学家的机器学习导论:概念、术语及新兴应用
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2025 Apr;10(2):432-450. doi: 10.1044/2024_persp-24-00037. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Cross-language interaction during sequential anomia treatment in three languages: Evidence from a trilingual person with aphasia.三种语言顺序性命名障碍治疗中的跨语言互动:来自一名失语症三语者的证据。
Cortex. 2025 Jun 4;189:107-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.017.
3
How the Stroop Effect Arises from Optimal Response Times in Laterally Connected Self-Organizing Maps.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of prestroke proficiency on poststroke lexical-semantic performance in bilingual aphasia.卒中前语言能力对双语失语症患者卒中后词汇语义表现的影响。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(10):1223-1240. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1666082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
Predicting treatment outcomes for bilinguals with aphasia using computational modeling: Study protocol for the PROCoM randomised controlled trial.使用计算模型预测双语失语症患者的治疗结果:PROCoM随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e040495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040495.
3
Variables and Mechanisms Affecting Response to Language Treatment in Multilingual People with Aphasia.
斯特鲁普效应如何源于横向连接的自组织映射中的最优反应时间。
ArXiv. 2025 May 11:arXiv:2502.02831v3.
4
Translanguaging in conversations for people with aphasia living in Greater Johannesburg, South Africa.南非约翰内斯堡地区失语症患者对话中的语码转换
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2025 Feb 12;72(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v72i1.1082.
5
Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.机器学习对双语中风后失语症恢复的预测:将见解与临床证据相结合。
Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):494-504. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047867. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
6
AI-assisted assessment and treatment of aphasia: a review.人工智能辅助的失语症评估与治疗:综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1401240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401240. eCollection 2024.
7
Multilevel factors predict treatment response following semantic feature-based intervention in bilingual aphasia.多水平因素预测双语失语症患者基于语义特征干预后的治疗反应。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2024 Mar;27(2):246-262. doi: 10.1017/s1366728923000391. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Disentangling neuroplasticity mechanisms in post-stroke language recovery.解析脑卒中后语言康复中的神经可塑性机制。
Brain Lang. 2024 Apr;251:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105381. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Understanding, facilitating and predicting aphasia recovery after rehabilitation.理解、促进和预测康复后失语症的恢复。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jun;24(3):248-259. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2075036. Epub 2022 May 23.
影响失语症多语言患者语言治疗反应的变量与机制
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Sep 22;10(9):144. doi: 10.3390/bs10090144.
4
On Simulating Neural Damage in Connectionist Networks.关于在联结主义网络中模拟神经损伤
Comput Brain Behav. 2020;3(3):289-321. doi: 10.1007/s42113-020-00081-z. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Predicting Early Post-stroke Aphasia Outcome From Initial Aphasia Severity.根据初始失语严重程度预测脑卒中后失语早期结局
Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 21;11:120. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00120. eCollection 2020.
6
How Much Time Do People With Aphasia Need to Respond During Picture Naming? Estimating Optimal Response Time Cutoffs Using a Multinomial Ex-Gaussian Approach.失语症患者在图片命名时需要多少时间来做出反应?使用多项 Ex-Gaussian 方法估计最佳反应时间截止值。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):599-614. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00255. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Language mixing patterns in a bilingual individual with non-fluent aphasia.一名患有非流利性失语症的双语者的语言混合模式。
Aphasiology. 2019;33(9):1137-1153. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1546821. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
BiLex: A computational approach to the effects of age of acquisition and language exposure on bilingual lexical access.比莱克斯:一种计算方法,用于研究习得年龄和语言接触对双语词汇通达的影响。
Brain Lang. 2019 Aug;195:104643. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104643. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
The influence of proficiency and language combination on bilingual lexical access.熟练程度和语言组合对双语词汇通达的影响。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2019 Mar;22(2):300-330. doi: 10.1017/S1366728918000366. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Bilingual Object Naming: A Connectionist Model.双语物体命名:一种联结主义模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00644. eCollection 2016.