• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情与社交距离:不同收入群体在出行适应方面的差异。

COVID-19 and social distancing: Disparities in mobility adaptation between income groups.

作者信息

Iio Kentaro, Guo Xiaoyu, Kong Xiaoqiang, Rees Kelly, Bruce Wang Xiubin

机构信息

Traf-IQ, Inc., 14811 St. Mary's Lane, Suite 180, Houston, TX 77079, United States.

Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136, United States.

出版信息

Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100333. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100333. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100333
PMID:34514367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8422281/
Abstract

In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, governments have encouraged and ordered citizens to practice social distancing, particularly by working and studying at home. Intuitively, only a subset of people have the ability to practice remote work. However, there has been little research on the disparity of mobility adaptation across different income groups in US cities during the pandemic. The authors worked to fill this gap by quantifying the impacts of the pandemic on human mobility by income in Greater Houston, Texas. We determined human mobility using pseudonymized, spatially disaggregated cell phone location data. A longitudinal study across estimated income groups was conducted by measuring the total travel distance, radius of gyration, number of visited locations, and per-trip distance in April 2020 compared to the data in a baseline. An apparent disparity in mobility was found across estimated income groups. In particular, there was a strong negative correlation (ρ = -0.90) between a traveler's estimated income and travel distance in April. Disparities in mobility adaptability were further shown since those in higher income brackets experienced larger percentage drops in the radius of gyration and the number of distinct visited locations than did those in lower income brackets. The findings of this study suggest a need to understand the reasons behind the mobility inflexibility among low-income populations during the pandemic. The study illuminates an equity issue which may be of interest to policy makers and researchers alike in the wake of an epidemic.

摘要

为应对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,各国政府鼓励并命令公民保持社交距离,尤其是通过在家工作和学习来实现。直观地说,只有一部分人有能力进行远程工作。然而,关于疫情期间美国城市不同收入群体在出行适应性方面的差异,此前几乎没有相关研究。作者致力于填补这一空白,通过量化疫情对得克萨斯州大休斯顿地区不同收入人群出行的影响来进行研究。我们使用经过匿名处理的、按空间细分的手机位置数据来确定人员流动情况。通过测量2020年4月与基线数据相比的总出行距离、回转半径、到访地点数量和单次出行距离,对不同估计收入群体进行了一项纵向研究。研究发现不同估计收入群体在出行方面存在明显差异。特别是,4月份旅行者的估计收入与出行距离之间存在很强的负相关(ρ = -0.90)。由于高收入群体的回转半径和不同到访地点数量的下降百分比比低收入群体更大,因此进一步显示出出行适应性的差异。这项研究的结果表明有必要了解疫情期间低收入人群出行灵活性不足背后的原因。该研究揭示了一个公平问题,在疫情之后,这可能会引起政策制定者和研究人员的关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/45bf51e2fc36/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/eb2c529c446d/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/1979d3268b54/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/0e521c1ada8c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/42a0099e775f/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/0d49813cf5e7/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/19960038a224/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/883c94bb0ec7/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/45bf51e2fc36/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/eb2c529c446d/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/1979d3268b54/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/0e521c1ada8c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/42a0099e775f/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/0d49813cf5e7/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/19960038a224/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/883c94bb0ec7/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b8/8422281/45bf51e2fc36/gr7_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 and social distancing: Disparities in mobility adaptation between income groups.新冠疫情与社交距离:不同收入群体在出行适应方面的差异。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100333. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100333. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
COVID-19 and income profile: How communities in the United States responded to mobility restrictions in the pandemic's early stages.新冠疫情与收入状况:美国社区在疫情初期对出行限制的应对方式。
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Dec 5. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12598.
3
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
4
Associations between changes in population mobility in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and socioeconomic factors at the city level in China and country level worldwide: a retrospective, observational study.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间人口流动变化与中国城市层面和全球国家层面社会经济因素的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e349-e359. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00059-5.
5
Understanding mobility change in response to COVID-19: A Los Angeles case study.了解应对新冠疫情时的出行变化:洛杉矶案例研究。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Apr;31:189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income.对 COVID-19 紧急声明的社会隔离反应因收入而有很大差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19658-19660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009412117. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
The Twitter Social Mobility Index: Measuring Social Distancing Practices With Geolocated Tweets.推特社会流动性指数:利用地理位置推文衡量社交距离措施
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21499. doi: 10.2196/21499.
8
Reference-free video-to-real distance approximation-based urban social distancing analytics amid COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间基于无参考视频到真实距离近似的城市社交距离分析
J Transp Health. 2021 Jun;21:101032. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101032. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
No Place Like Home: Cross-National Data Analysis of the Efficacy of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.无处可逃:新冠疫情期间社交隔离有效性的跨国数据分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 28;6(2):e19862. doi: 10.2196/19862.
10
Mobile Phone GPS Data and Prevalence of COVID-19 Infections: Quantifying Parameters of Social Distancing in the U.S.手机GPS数据与新冠病毒感染率:量化美国社交距离参数
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Mar;9(2):217-223. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.48515.2404.

引用本文的文献

1
Shifting Mobility Behaviors in Unprecedented Times: A Multigroup MIMIC Model Investigating Intentions to Use On-Demand Ride Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic.前所未有的时期中出行行为的转变:一个多组MIMIC模型,研究在新冠疫情期间使用按需乘车服务的意愿
Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):704-722. doi: 10.1177/03611981221147520. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
Development of multi-scale indices of human mobility restriction during the COVID-19 based on air quality from local and global NO concentration.基于本地和全球一氧化氮浓度的空气质量,开发COVID-19期间人类流动限制的多尺度指标。
iScience. 2023 Aug 11;26(9):107599. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107599. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How COVID-19 and the Dutch 'intelligent lockdown' change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands.新冠疫情与荷兰“智能封锁”如何改变活动、工作和出行行为:来自荷兰纵向数据的证据
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
2
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior.新冠疫情及后续社交距离措施对出行行为的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
3
The Immediate Effect of COVID-19 Policies on Social-Distancing Behavior in the United States.
Applying an interpretable machine learning framework to study mobility inequity in the recovery phase of COVID-19 pandemic.
应用可解释的机器学习框架研究新冠疫情恢复期的出行不平等问题。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Oct;33:100621. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100621. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social sphere and lessons for crisis management: a literature review.新冠疫情对社会领域的影响及危机管理经验教训:文献综述
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2023 Apr 10:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-05959-2.
5
The role of the California tier system in controlling population mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic.加利福尼亚州层级系统在 COVID-19 大流行期间控制人口流动的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 18;23(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15858-7.
6
Metro travel and perceived COVID-19 infection risks: A case study of Hong Kong.地铁出行与感知到的新冠病毒感染风险:以香港为例的案例研究
Cities. 2023 Jun;137:104307. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104307. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
7
The illusion of personal health decisions for infectious disease management: disease spread in social contact networks.传染病管理中个人健康决策的错觉:社交网络中的疾病传播
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 29;10(3):221122. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221122. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
COVID-19 and income profile: How communities in the United States responded to mobility restrictions in the pandemic's early stages.新冠疫情与收入状况:美国社区在疫情初期对出行限制的应对方式。
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Dec 5. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12598.
9
Effect of COVID-19 infection related experiences on social behaviors when a state of emergency is declared: a cohort study.宣布紧急状态时,与 COVID-19 感染相关的经历对社交行为的影响:一项队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):2445. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14864-5.
10
How did human dwelling and working intensity change over different stages of COVID-19 in Beijing?在北京,新冠肺炎疫情不同阶段人类的居住和工作强度是如何变化的?
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Nov;74:103206. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103206. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
《新冠疫情政策对美国社交隔离行为的即时影响》
Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0033354920976575. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
A survey dataset to evaluate the changes in mobility and transportation due to COVID-19 travel restrictions in Australia, Brazil, China, Ghana, India, Iran, Italy, Norway, South Africa, United States.一项用于评估澳大利亚、巴西、中国、加纳、印度、伊朗、意大利、挪威、南非、美国因新冠疫情出行限制导致的出行和交通变化的调查数据集。
Data Brief. 2020 Oct 24;33:106459. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106459. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的邻里收入与物理隔离。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1294-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00998-2. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic.非强制性措施在 COVID-19 疫情期间极大地降低了东京的人员流动性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75033-5.
7
Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income.对 COVID-19 紧急声明的社会隔离反应因收入而有很大差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19658-19660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009412117. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Assessing the impact of coordinated COVID-19 exit strategies across Europe.评估欧洲协调一致的 COVID-19 退出策略的影响。
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1465-1470. doi: 10.1126/science.abc5096. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
COVID-19 outbreak response, a dataset to assess mobility changes in Italy following national lockdown.COVID-19 疫情应对,评估意大利全国封锁后流动性变化的数据集。
Sci Data. 2020 Jul 8;7(1):230. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00575-2.
10
Effect of the social distancing measures on the spread of COVID-19 in 10 highly infected countries.社交距离措施对 10 个高感染国家 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 10;742:140430. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140430. Epub 2020 Jun 22.