• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭规模与 COVID-19 之间的关联:英国生物银行观察性研究。

Association between household size and COVID-19: A UK Biobank observational study.

机构信息

Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.

Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2022 Apr;115(4):138-144. doi: 10.1177/01410768211073923. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1177/01410768211073923
PMID:35118908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8972956/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between household size and risk of non-severe or severe COVID-19.

DESIGN

A longitudinal observational study.

SETTING

This study utilised UK Biobank linked to national SARS-CoV-2 laboratory test data.

PARTICIPANTS

401,910 individuals with available data on household size in UK Biobank.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Household size was categorised as single occupancy, two-person households and households of three or more. Severe COVID-19 was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test on hospital admission or death with COVID-19 recorded as the underlying cause; and non-severe COVID-19 as a positive test from a community setting. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess associations, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 401,910 individuals, 3612 (1%) were identified as having suffered from a severe COVID-19 infection and 11,264 (2.8%) from a non-severe infection, between 16 March 2020 and 16 March 2021. Overall, the odds of severe COVID-19 was significantly higher among individuals living alone (adjusted odds ratio: 1.24 [95% confidence interval: 1.14 to 1.36], or living in a household of three or more individuals (adjusted odds ratio: 1.28 [1.17 to 1.39], when compared to individuals living in a household of two. For non-severe COVID-19 infection, individuals living in a single-occupancy household had lower odds compared to those living in a household of two (adjusted odds ratio: 0.88 [0.82 to 0.93].

CONCLUSIONS

Odds of severe or non-severe COVID-19 infection were associated with household size. Increasing understanding of why certain households are more at risk is important for limiting spread of the infection.

摘要

目的

评估家庭规模与非重症或重症 COVID-19 风险之间的关联。

设计

纵向观察性研究。

设置

本研究利用英国生物银行(UK Biobank)与国家 SARS-CoV-2 实验室检测数据进行关联。

参与者

401910 名在 UK Biobank 中有家庭规模相关数据的个体。

主要观察指标

家庭规模分为单人居住、两人家庭和三人或以上家庭。重症 COVID-19 定义为住院时 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性或因 COVID-19 死亡且 COVID-19 被记录为根本死因;非重症 COVID-19 为社区环境中检测呈阳性。使用逻辑回归模型评估关联,并调整潜在混杂因素。

结果

在 401910 名个体中,在 2020 年 3 月 16 日至 2021 年 3 月 16 日期间,有 3612 人(1%)被确诊患有重症 COVID-19 感染,有 11264 人(2.8%)患有非重症感染。总体而言,与居住在两人家庭的个体相比,独居者(调整后的优势比:1.24 [95%置信区间:1.14 至 1.36])或居住在三人或以上家庭的个体(调整后的优势比:1.28 [1.17 至 1.39])发生重症 COVID-19 的可能性明显更高。对于非重症 COVID-19 感染,与居住在两人家庭的个体相比,居住在单人居住家庭的个体发生感染的可能性较低(调整后的优势比:0.88 [0.82 至 0.93])。

结论

重症或非重症 COVID-19 感染的几率与家庭规模有关。增加对某些家庭风险较高的原因的理解对于限制感染的传播非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b9/8981550/070467209321/10.1177_01410768211073923-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b9/8981550/7e4427bd96e8/10.1177_01410768211073923-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b9/8981550/070467209321/10.1177_01410768211073923-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b9/8981550/7e4427bd96e8/10.1177_01410768211073923-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94b9/8981550/070467209321/10.1177_01410768211073923-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between household size and COVID-19: A UK Biobank observational study.家庭规模与 COVID-19 之间的关联:英国生物银行观察性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Apr;115(4):138-144. doi: 10.1177/01410768211073923. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
2
Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank.SARS-CoV-2 感染的种族和社会经济差异:使用英国生物库的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2020 May 29;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8.
3
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Comparison of two different frailty measurements and risk of hospitalisation or death from COVID-19: findings from UK Biobank.比较两种不同的衰弱测量方法与 COVID-19 住院或死亡风险的关系:来自英国生物银行的研究结果。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 10;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01822-4.
5
Associations of air pollution with COVID-19 positivity, hospitalisations, and mortality: Observational evidence from UK Biobank.空气污染与 COVID-19 阳性率、住院率和死亡率的关联:来自英国生物银行的观察性证据。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Sep 1;308:119686. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119686. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Clinical, regional, and genetic characteristics of Covid-19 patients from UK Biobank.英国生物银行新冠患者的临床、区域和遗传特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0241264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241264. eCollection 2020.
7
Risk factors and disease profile of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app: a prospective, community-based, nested, case-control study.在 COVID 症状研究应用程序的英国用户中,疫苗接种后 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险因素和疾病特征:一项前瞻性、基于社区的、嵌套的病例对照研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):43-55. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00460-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Occupational characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK Biobank during August-November 2020: a cohort study.2020 年 8 月至 11 月期间英国生物银行中与 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的职业特征:一项队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):1884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14311-5.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
COVID-19 related outcomes among individuals with neurodegenerative diseases: a cohort analysis in the UK biobank.与神经退行性疾病患者相关的 COVID-19 结局:英国生物库中的队列分析。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02536-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual, household structure, and socioeconomic predictors of COVID-19 testing and vaccination outcomes: a whole population linked data analysis.新冠病毒检测与疫苗接种结果的个体、家庭结构及社会经济预测因素:一项全人群关联数据分析
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 May 27;10(1):2930. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2930. eCollection 2025.
2
The association of combinations of social factors and SARs-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, 2020-2021.社会因素组合与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的关联:2020 - 2021年安大略省基于人群的回顾性队列研究
Dialogues Health. 2024 Oct 29;5:100197. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100197. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnicity, household composition and COVID-19 mortality: a national linked data study.族群、家庭结构与 COVID-19 死亡率:全国关联数据研究。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Apr;114(4):182-211. doi: 10.1177/0141076821999973. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Crowding Effects Dominate Demographic Attributes in COVID-19 Cases.拥挤效应对新冠病例的人口统计学特征起主导作用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.063. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
The impact of obesity on severe disease and mortality in people with SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Assessment of the relationship between living alone and suicidal behaviors based on prospective studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于前瞻性研究评估独居与自杀行为之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;12:1444820. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444820. eCollection 2024.
4
UK biobank: Enhanced assessment of the epidemiology and long-term impact of coronavirus disease-2019.英国生物银行:对2019冠状病毒病的流行病学和长期影响的强化评估。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 Aug 29;1:e30. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.18. eCollection 2023.
5
Dietary Supplement Use among Iranian Households during COVID-19 Epidemic Lockdown: Less Access in Those Who May Need More National Food and Nutrition Surveillance.新冠疫情封锁期间伊朗家庭的膳食补充剂使用情况:那些可能更需要国家食品和营养监测的人群获取途径较少
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Jul 27;14:99. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_207_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of socio-economic determinants of COVID-19 testing and positivity in Canada: A multi-provincial analysis.比较加拿大 COVID-19 检测和阳性率的社会经济决定因素:一项多省分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0289292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289292. eCollection 2023.
7
Racial-ethnic, gender identity, and sexual orientation disparities in COVID-19-related social and health outcomes: A decomposition analysis.COVID-19相关社会和健康结果中的种族、性别认同及性取向差异:一项分解分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 23;23:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101474. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking.用于国家决策制定的 COVID-19 疫苗有效性的病例对照研究的偏倚评估。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 6;14(1):3984. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39674-0.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom.长新冠的社会经济不平等:英国基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Aug;116(8):263-273. doi: 10.1177/01410768231168377. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
Hesitancy to Undergo SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing in China: Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.对 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的犹豫:全国横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 May 1;9:e43555. doi: 10.2196/43555.
肥胖对感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)患者的重症疾病及死亡率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020 Aug 14;4(1):e00176. doi: 10.1002/edm2.176. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Socio-demographic heterogeneity in the prevalence of COVID-19 during lockdown is associated with ethnicity and household size: Results from an observational cohort study.封锁期间新冠病毒病患病率的社会人口学异质性与种族和家庭规模有关:一项观察性队列研究的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Aug;25:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100466. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Prevalence of co-morbidities and their association with mortality in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 患者合并症的患病率及其与死亡率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Oct;22(10):1915-1924. doi: 10.1111/dom.14124. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Dynamic linkage of COVID-19 test results between Public Health England's Second Generation Surveillance System and UK Biobank.英格兰公共卫生局第二代监测系统与英国生物样本库之间的 COVID-19 检测结果动态链接。
Microb Genom. 2020 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000397.
7
Multimorbidity and SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK Biobank.英国生物银行中的多重疾病与新冠病毒感染
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):775-776. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis.在常规应答率的情况下,与具有代表性的、基于一般人群的研究相比,英国生物银行中风险因素相关性的比较:前瞻性队列研究和个体参与者荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 12;368:m131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m131.
9
The association between living alone and health care utilisation in older adults: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records from a London general practice.独居与老年人医疗保健利用之间的关联:来自伦敦一家普通诊所电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0939-4.
10
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population.英国生物银行参与者与普通人群的社会人口学特征及健康相关特征比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 1;186(9):1026-1034. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx246.