• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Galilei G6和OCT Casia 2对角膜参数进行的比较分析。

Comparative Analysis of Corneal Parameters Performed with GalileiG6 and OCT Casia 2.

作者信息

Mazur Robert, Wylęgała Adam, Wylęgała Edward, Dobrowolski Dariusz

机构信息

Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

Pathophysiology Department, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(2):267. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020267.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13020267
PMID:36673077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9857403/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

To compare keratometry (Ks and Kf), astigmatism (Ast.), and the astigmatism axes (Ax.) of the posterior surface of the cornea; the total, central cornea thickness (CCT); and the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measured using two different measurement methods.

METHODS

Patients qualified for cataract surgery at the Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, were included in the study and monitored with the following two devices: OCT-CASIA2 and Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer GalileiG6. Our work was a randomized, prospective study in which compliance with the agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (62 females and 48 males) were examined. Overall, 100 eyes of patients that qualified for cataract surgery were enrolled in the study. No statistically significant difference was observed for Total-Ks and Total-Kf. A significant difference was observable for the following parameters: total Ks-ax, total Kf-ax, the total power of astigmatism, and in all parameters of the part of the cornea and corneal thickness (CCT and TCT).

CONCLUSIONS

The measurements obtained using Casia2 and the Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer GalileiG6 were significantly different and not interchangeable except for total Ks and Kf.

摘要

背景

比较角膜后表面的角膜曲率(Ks和Kf)、散光(Ast.)及散光轴(Ax.);使用两种不同测量方法测量的中央角膜总厚度(CCT)和最薄角膜厚度(TCT)。

方法

纳入波兰卡托维兹西里西亚医科大学扎布热医学院眼科教研室符合白内障手术条件的患者,并使用以下两种设备进行监测:OCT-CASIA2和双Scheimpflug分析仪GalileiG6。本研究为一项随机前瞻性研究,采用Bland-Altman方法评估设备间测量结果的一致性。

结果

共检查了1,10例患者(62例女性和48例男性)。总体而言,100例符合白内障手术条件患者的眼睛纳入研究。Total-Ks和Total-Kf未观察到统计学显著差异。以下参数存在显著差异:总Ks轴、总Kf轴、总散光度数以及角膜部分和角膜厚度(CCT和TCT)的所有参数。

结论

除总Ks和Kf外,使用Casia2和双Scheimpflug分析仪GalileiG6获得的测量结果存在显著差异且不可互换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/be354fde71d6/diagnostics-13-00267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/5c189e6810d5/diagnostics-13-00267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/637a914aef2f/diagnostics-13-00267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/c40b0c5492b5/diagnostics-13-00267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/be354fde71d6/diagnostics-13-00267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/5c189e6810d5/diagnostics-13-00267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/637a914aef2f/diagnostics-13-00267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/c40b0c5492b5/diagnostics-13-00267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af4/9857403/be354fde71d6/diagnostics-13-00267-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Parameters Performed with GalileiG6 and OCT Casia 2.使用Galilei G6和OCT Casia 2对角膜参数进行的比较分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(2):267. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020267.
2
[Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by the new anterior segment optical coherence tomographic device and Scheimpflug imaging device in age-related cataract patients].[新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描设备与Scheimpflug成像设备测量年龄相关性白内障患者角膜屈光力和散光的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 11;57(1):48-55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200904-00574.
3
Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus using swept-source optical coherence tomography and combined Placido-Scheimpflug imaging.使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描和普拉西多-谢姆弗鲁格联合成像技术对比圆锥角膜的角膜测量结果
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;95(6):e486-e494. doi: 10.1111/aos.13298. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
4
Longitudinal Evaluation of Cornea With Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Imaging Before and After Lasik.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术前后使用扫频光学相干断层扫描和眼前节分析系统对角膜进行纵向评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1219. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001219.
5
Corneal thickness measurements with the RTVue, Casia-2, and Pentacam devices in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus: a comparative study.应用 RTVue、Casia-2 和 Pentacam 设备测量轻中度圆锥角膜患者的角膜厚度:一项对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02767-x.
6
Agreement of corneal curvature and central corneal thickness obtained from a swept-source OCT and Pentacam in ectopia lentis patients.晶状体异位患者中使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和Pentacam测量获得的角膜曲率和中央角膜厚度的一致性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 18;13(8):1244-1249. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.08.10. eCollection 2020.
7
Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.眼前节参数测量结果与CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700的一致性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 11;9:777443. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.777443. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of total keratometry with corneal power measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry and placido-dual Scheimpflug system.通过光学低相干反射测量法和普拉西多-双 Scheimpflug 系统测量的总角膜曲率与角膜屈光力的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;32(3):1496-1503. doi: 10.1177/11206721211020633. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Measurements of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Curvatures with OCT and Scheimpflug Biometers in Patients with Low Total Corneal Astigmatism.在总角膜散光较低的患者中使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和Scheimpflug生物测量仪测量角膜前后曲率
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6921. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236921.
10
Comparative analysis of measurements of the anterior segment and the axial length parameters of the eyeball obtained with optical and ultrasound technique.光学和超声技术测量眼前节和眼球轴长参数的比较分析。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Dec;18(12):1245-1253. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2012448. Epub 2021 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereo slit-scanning tomography of the anterior segment of the human eye.眼前节的立体缝隙扫描断层成像。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 10;14(1):27454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78101-2.
2
Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source optical coherence and dual Scheimpflug tomography devices in keratoconus eyes.在圆锥角膜眼中,扫频源光学相干和双 Scheimpflug 断层成像设备在前节测量中的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 17;14(1):24368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76031-7.
3
Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices and Scheimpflug tomography in patients with cataract.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION.双 Scheimpflug 分析仪、GALILEI G6 和扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 的眼部生物测量学临床评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07696-1.
2
Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.眼前节参数测量结果与CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700的一致性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 11;9:777443. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.777443. eCollection 2022.
3
Lens Biometry in Congenital Lens Deformities: A Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Analysis.
白内障患者中两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备与Scheimpflug断层扫描术的眼部生物测量参数比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 18;17(8):1437-1446. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.08.08. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparative Analysis of Keratometric and Pachymetry Values From Corneal Topography Scans: A Comparison Between Pentacam and Galilei.角膜地形图扫描中角膜曲率计和角膜厚度测量值的比较分析:Pentacam与Galilei的对比
Cureus. 2024 Jun 9;16(6):e61993. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61993. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.圆锥角膜:成像方式与治疗
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;13(1):44-54. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1493. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices, a Scheimpflug camera system and a ray-tracing aberrometer in the measurement of corneal power in patients with cataract.比较两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪、Scheimpflug 相机系统和光线追踪像差仪在白内障患者角膜屈光力测量中的应用。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1567-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06348-y. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
先天性晶状体畸形中的晶状体生物测量:扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 20;8:774640. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.774640. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparative analysis of measurements of the anterior segment and the axial length parameters of the eyeball obtained with optical and ultrasound technique.光学和超声技术测量眼前节和眼球轴长参数的比较分析。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Dec;18(12):1245-1253. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2012448. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Agreement and Repeatability of Corneal Thickness and Radius among Three Different Corneal Measurement Devices.三种不同角膜测量设备测量的角膜厚度和曲率半径的一致性和可重复性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Oct 1;98(10):1196-1202. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001785.
6
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.
7
Repeatability, reproducibility, and comparison of ocular biometry using a new optical coherence tomography-based system and another device.使用新型基于光学相干断层扫描的系统和另一设备进行眼生物测量的可重复性、可再现性和比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 2;10(1):14440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71192-7.
8
Agreement of corneal curvature and central corneal thickness obtained from a swept-source OCT and Pentacam in ectopia lentis patients.晶状体异位患者中使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和Pentacam测量获得的角膜曲率和中央角膜厚度的一致性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 18;13(8):1244-1249. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.08.10. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness.新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描与欧科路三维眼前节分析系统测量前房深度和角膜厚度的比较
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(14):857. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-187.
10
The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging.使用扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)与眼前节分析系统成像测量角膜厚度和角膜曲率的精度及一致性。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Jun 9;7:32. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0. eCollection 2020.