• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 ANTERION 和 IOL Master 700 的眼生物测量和屈光结果。

Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.

机构信息

Glaucoma Fellow - JPM Rotary Eye Hospital, Bidanasi, Cuttack, India.

Managing Director - Kar Vision Eye Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;70(5):1594-1598. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2433_21.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2433_21
PMID:35502033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9332939/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the comparability of ocular biometry measurements and refractive outcomes between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.

METHODS

This comparative prospective study was conducted from December 2020 to February 2021. A total of 225 patients who had cataracts were enrolled for the study and different parameters such as anterior keratometry (Steep K, Flat K) with axis, Sim K, central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) were evaluated in IOL master 700 first and then with ANTERION. Finally, 203 patients completed the 6-week follow-up and the postoperative refraction was done at the 6 week. To assess the agreement between the devices, intraclass coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used. To analyze the agreement for postoperative residual refractive error between the two devices, Kappa statistics were used.

RESULTS

The mean difference for steep K, flat K, and Sim K between ANTERION and IOL Master 700 were - 0.18 +/-0.26 D, -0.13+/- 0.28D, -0.15 +/-0.23, respectively. The CCT, ACD, and LT also showed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.9) but the similarity for the keratometry axis was not up to the mark (ICC = 0.794). For postoperative refractive outcomes, the Kappa value was 0.437, indicating moderate agreement.

CONCLUSION

: ANTERION showed a good agreement for the majority of parameters with IOLMaster 700 in measuring ocular biometry, except for the keratometry. The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers though the IOL power given by ANTERION remained slightly on the hypermetropic side.

摘要

目的

评估 ANTERION 与 IOL Master 700 之间的眼生物测量和屈光结果的可比性。

方法

本研究为前瞻性比较研究,于 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 2 月进行。共纳入 225 例白内障患者,分别使用 IOL Master 700 测量前角膜曲率(陡 K、平 K 和轴)、Sim K、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、房水深度(AQD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和眼轴(AL)等参数,然后使用 ANTERION 重复测量。最后,203 例患者完成 6 周随访,术后 6 周行屈光检查。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 分析(95%一致性界限)评估设备间的一致性,采用 Kappa 统计分析评估两种设备间术后残余屈光误差的一致性。

结果

ANTERION 与 IOL Master 700 之间的陡 K、平 K 和 Sim K 的平均差异分别为-0.18+/-0.26 D、-0.13+/-0.28 D 和-0.15+/-0.23 D。CCT、ACD 和 LT 也具有很好的一致性(ICC>0.9),但角膜曲率轴的相似性不理想(ICC=0.794)。术后屈光结果的 Kappa 值为 0.437,表明具有中度一致性。

结论

ANTERION 在测量眼生物参数方面与 IOLMaster 700 大多数参数具有良好的一致性,除了角膜曲率。两种生物测量仪的人工晶状体屈光度计算的准确性均为临床可接受,但 ANTERION 给出的人工晶状体屈光度稍偏远视。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.比较 ANTERION 和 IOL Master 700 的眼生物测量和屈光结果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;70(5):1594-1598. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2433_21.
2
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.
3
Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.一种新型扫频源光相干断层扫描仪的可重复性及其与其他三种光生物测量仪的一致性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;260(7):2271-2281. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05579-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers.比较三种生物测量仪的测量值和计算的晶状体屈光度:带有部分相干干涉测量术的 Scheimpflug 断层扫描仪和两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03658-5.
5
Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.两种基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪的光学生物测量仪在白内障手术后的屈光效果比较:一项 152 眼研究。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2024 Jun;47(6):104186. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104186. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪与 Scheimpflug 部分相干干涉仪的一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Apr 1;47(4):488-495. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000483.
7
Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.评价一种新型光学生物测量仪测量眼部参数的性能,并与 IOLMaster 进行比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1277-81. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305150. Epub 2014 May 2.
8
Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.两种扫频源光学相干生物测量仪与部分相干干涉仪的一致性。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;36(4):326-337. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2022.0017. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Comparison of Refractive Prediction Accuracy With Three Optical Devices.三种光学设备屈光预测准确性的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Jan;39(1):48-55. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20221115-02. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
10
Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices.使用两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备评估原发性闭角型青光眼的眼生物测量学
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265844. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproducibility and accuracy of corneal curvature measurements in patients with and without dry eye: a device-based study.干眼症患者与非干眼症患者角膜曲率测量的可重复性和准确性:一项基于设备的研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1565740. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1565740. eCollection 2025.
2
The refractive accuracy between topographic keratometry and biometric keratometry for extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens implantation.用于扩展焦深人工晶状体植入的地形图角膜曲率测量法与生物测量角膜曲率测量法之间的屈光精度。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 4;21(15):2912-2918. doi: 10.7150/ijms.99907. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of the iris-ciliary angle on the prediction of the vault for phakic implantable collamer lens in the manufacturer's calculator.虹膜睫状体角对制造商计算器中预测有晶状体眼人工晶状体拱高的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03756-4.
4
Clinical Evaluation of a New Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer.一种基于新型频域光学相干断层扫描技术的生物测量仪的临床评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;14(5):560. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050560.
5
Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error.不同屈光不正患者的扫频源光学相干断层扫描的角对角和齿对齿评估
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 21;17(11):e0277703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277703. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.使用三种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备对白内障患者眼部生物测量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01826-5.
2
Repeatability of automated measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and biometer and agreement with standard devices.新型眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪和生物测量仪的自动测量重复性及其与标准设备的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):983. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79674-4.
3
Comparison study of the axial length measured using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography ANTERION and the partial coherence interferometry IOL Master.使用新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪 ANTERION 和部分相干干涉仪 IOL Master 测量眼轴长度的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244590. eCollection 2020.
4
Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography.扫频源光学相干断层扫描的眼生物测量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jun 1;47(6):802-814. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551.
5
Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power.三种设备测量的生物测量重复性及其对预测人工晶状体屈光力的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 May 1;47(5):585-592. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000494.
6
Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.两款基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的生物测量设备的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000373.
7
Efficacy of Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography in Axial Length Measurement for Advanced Cataract Patients.扫频源光学相干断层扫描在高度近视白内障患者眼轴测量中的疗效。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Mar;97(3):186-191. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001491.
8
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪和部分相干干涉仪的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114. eCollection 2019.
9
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices.使用两种基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的生物测量仪进行眼生物测量和屈光结果测量,这两种生物测量仪的分段或等效折射率不同。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3.
10
Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients.新型扫频源光学相干生物测量仪的临床评估,该仪器使用个体折射率测量白内障患者眼轴长度。
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(1):11-23. doi: 10.1159/000496690. Epub 2019 Mar 19.