• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Botometer 101:面向计算社会科学家的社交机器人实践

Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientists.

作者信息

Yang Kai-Cheng, Ferrara Emilio, Menczer Filippo

机构信息

Observatory on Social Media, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA.

Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA 90292 USA.

出版信息

J Comput Soc Sci. 2022;5(2):1511-1528. doi: 10.1007/s42001-022-00177-5. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s42001-022-00177-5
PMID:36035522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9391657/
Abstract

Social bots have become an important component of online social media. Deceptive bots, in particular, can manipulate online discussions of important issues ranging from elections to public health, threatening the constructive exchange of information. Their ubiquity makes them an interesting research subject and requires researchers to properly handle them when conducting studies using social media data. Therefore, it is important for researchers to gain access to bot detection tools that are reliable and easy to use. This paper aims to provide an introductory tutorial of Botometer, a public tool for bot detection on Twitter, for readers who are new to this topic and may not be familiar with programming and machine learning. We introduce how Botometer works, the different ways users can access it, and present a case study as a demonstration. Readers can use the case study code as a template for their own research. We also discuss recommended practice for using Botometer.

摘要

社交机器人已成为在线社交媒体的重要组成部分。尤其是欺骗性机器人,它们能够操纵从选举到公共卫生等重要问题的在线讨论,威胁到信息的建设性交流。它们的普遍存在使其成为一个有趣的研究课题,并且要求研究人员在使用社交媒体数据进行研究时妥善处理它们。因此,研究人员能够使用可靠且易于使用的机器人检测工具非常重要。本文旨在为刚接触该主题且可能不熟悉编程和机器学习的读者提供一份关于Botometer的入门教程,Botometer是一个用于在推特上检测机器人的公共工具。我们介绍了Botometer的工作原理、用户可以访问它的不同方式,并展示了一个案例研究作为示范。读者可以将案例研究代码用作自己研究的模板。我们还讨论了使用Botometer的推荐做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/69f311d5c514/42001_2022_177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/bd1574cae863/42001_2022_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/f58579bc30a1/42001_2022_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/44887f7c8a97/42001_2022_177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/9ad40fa5621c/42001_2022_177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/69f311d5c514/42001_2022_177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/bd1574cae863/42001_2022_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/f58579bc30a1/42001_2022_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/44887f7c8a97/42001_2022_177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/9ad40fa5621c/42001_2022_177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a673/9391657/69f311d5c514/42001_2022_177_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientists.Botometer 101:面向计算社会科学家的社交机器人实践
J Comput Soc Sci. 2022;5(2):1511-1528. doi: 10.1007/s42001-022-00177-5. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
The False positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research.自动化 Bot 检测在社会科学研究中的假阳性问题。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241045. eCollection 2020.
3
Sociodemographics and Transdiagnostic Mental Health Symptoms in SOCIAL (Studies of Online Cohorts for Internalizing Symptoms and Language) I and II: Cross-sectional Survey and Botometer Analysis.社会人口统计学与社交(内化症状和语言在线队列研究)I和II中的跨诊断心理健康症状:横断面调查与机器人检测分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 20;6(10):e39324. doi: 10.2196/39324.
4
Assessing the Role of Social Bots During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemic, Disagreement, and Criticism.评估新冠疫情期间社交机器人的作用:信息疫情、分歧和批评。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e36085. doi: 10.2196/36085.
5
Public Opinion Manipulation on Social Media: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Bots during the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体上的舆论操纵:新冠疫情期间推特机器人的社交网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;19(24):16376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416376.
6
An adept approach to ascertain and elude probable social bots attacks on twitter and twitch employing machine learning approach.一种采用机器学习方法来确定并规避推特和Twitch上可能存在的社交机器人攻击的娴熟方法。
MethodsX. 2023 Oct 10;11:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102430. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
E-Cigarette Surveillance With Social Media Data: Social Bots, Emerging Topics, and Trends.利用社交媒体数据进行电子烟监测:社交机器人、新兴话题及趋势
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Dec 20;3(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8641.
8
Social Bots' Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion on Twitter.社交媒体机器人在推特上关于 COVID-19 大流行讨论中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;20(4):3284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043284.
9
Insights into elections: An ensemble bot detection coverage framework applied to the 2018 U.S. midterm elections.选举洞察:适用于 2018 年美国中期选举的集成机器人检测覆盖框架。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244309. eCollection 2021.
10
Not our kind of crowd! How partisan bias distorts perceptions of political bots on Twitter (now X).不是我们这类人!党派偏见如何扭曲在推特(现为X)上对政治机器人的认知。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12794. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12794. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Emoji-Driven Sentiment Analysis for Social Bot Detection with Relational Graph Convolutional Networks.基于关系图卷积网络的表情符号驱动的社交机器人检测情感分析
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;25(13):4179. doi: 10.3390/s25134179.
2
Quantifying Bot Impact: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Complexity and Uncertainty in Online Political Communication Dynamics.量化机器人的影响:在线政治传播动态中复杂性与不确定性的信息论分析
Entropy (Basel). 2025 May 28;27(6):573. doi: 10.3390/e27060573.
3
A global comparison of social media bot and human characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
Neutral bots probe political bias on social media.中立机器人探测社交媒体上的政治偏见。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):5580. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25738-6.
2
Social Bots' Sentiment Engagement in Health Emergencies: A Topic-Based Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussions on Twitter.社交媒体机器人在健康突发事件中的情感参与:基于主题的 COVID-19 大流行在 Twitter 上讨论分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228701.
3
Bots and online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies in the United States and the Philippines.
社交媒体机器人与人类特征的全球比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):10973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96372-1.
4
Comparing methods for creating a national random sample of twitter users.比较创建推特用户全国随机样本的方法。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2024;14(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s13278-024-01327-5. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Differential impact from individual versus collective misinformation tagging on the diversity of Twitter (X) information engagement and mobility.个体与集体错误信息标记对推特(X)信息参与度和传播多样性的差异影响。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 24;16(1):973. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55868-0.
6
A graph neural architecture search approach for identifying bots in social media.一种用于识别社交媒体中机器人的图神经网络架构搜索方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Dec 20;7:1509179. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1509179. eCollection 2024.
7
Detecting anomalies in graph networks on digital markets.检测数字市场中图形网络的异常情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0315849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315849. eCollection 2024.
8
Deciphering Influence on Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Influential Account Detection Metrics in the Context of Tobacco Promotion.解读社交媒体上的影响力:烟草促销背景下有影响力账户检测指标的比较分析
Soc Media Soc. 2024 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1177/20563051231224268. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
9
Social bots spoil activist sentiment without eroding engagement.社交机器人在不削弱参与度的情况下破坏了活动家的情绪。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):27005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74032-0.
10
From Tweets to Streets: Observational Study on the Association Between Twitter Sentiment and Anti-Asian Hate Crimes in New York City from 2019 to 2022.从推文到街头:2019 年至 2022 年纽约市推特情绪与反亚裔仇恨犯罪的观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 9;26:e53050. doi: 10.2196/53050.
新冠疫情期间的网络机器人与网络仇恨:美国和菲律宾的案例研究
J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):445-468. doi: 10.1007/s42001-020-00087-4. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
The False positive problem of automatic bot detection in social science research.自动化 Bot 检测在社会科学研究中的假阳性问题。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0241045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241045. eCollection 2020.
5
Social scientists battle bots to glean insights from online chatter.社会科学家与机器人作战,以从网络聊天中获取见解。
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):17. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00141-1.
6
Cannabis Surveillance With Twitter Data: Emerging Topics and Social Bots.利用 Twitter 数据进行大麻监测:新兴主题和社交机器人。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):357-362. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305461. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Machine behaviour.机器行为。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7753):477-486. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Malicious Actors on Twitter: A Guide for Public Health Researchers.推特上的恶意行为者:公共卫生研究人员指南。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):688-692. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304969. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选期间推特上的假新闻。
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
10
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.推特上 2016 年美国总统大选期间假新闻的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2.