• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度脱碳电力系统中双向与单向电动汽车充电相对价值的理想化分析。

Idealized analysis of relative values of bidirectional versus unidirectional electric vehicle charging in deeply decarbonized electricity systems.

作者信息

Dioha Michael O, Ruggles Tyler H, Ashfaq Sara, Caldeira Ken

机构信息

Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Breakthrough Energy, Kirkland, WA 98033, USA.

出版信息

iScience. 2022 Aug 11;25(9):104906. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104906. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104906
PMID:36060055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9428816/
Abstract

We employed an idealized macro-energy system model to examine how the value of unidirectionally- and bidirectionally-charging electric vehicles (EVs) varies with EV penetration and mix of electricity generators. We find that EVs can help wind and solar-based electricity generation systems to be less costly by making better use of power that would otherwise be curtailed and, potentially, by giving electricity back to the grid at times of peak net load. At low levels of EV penetration, bidirectional EVs are valuable because they can provide electricity at times of main load peak. At today's low levels of EV penetration, bidirectional EVs stimulate investments in solar and wind generation and substantially reduce the need for grid-battery storage compared to unidirectional EVs. At high levels of EV penetration, generation capacity must be increased, and most peaks in main net load demand can be met by reductions in charging by unidirectional EVs.

摘要

我们采用了一个理想化的宏观能源系统模型,来研究单向充电和双向充电电动汽车(EV)的价值如何随电动汽车普及率以及发电设备组合而变化。我们发现,电动汽车可以通过更好地利用原本会被削减的电力,以及在净负荷峰值时将电力回馈给电网,来帮助基于风能和太阳能的发电系统降低成本。在电动汽车普及率较低时,双向电动汽车很有价值,因为它们可以在主要负荷峰值时供电。在如今电动汽车普及率较低的情况下,与单向电动汽车相比,双向电动汽车刺激了对太阳能和风能发电的投资,并大幅减少了对电网电池储能的需求。在电动汽车普及率较高时,必须增加发电能力,并且大部分主要净负荷需求峰值可以通过单向电动汽车减少充电来满足。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/fe7438e23e2e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/9f546fbc7730/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/6ec97f7677f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/9a2701503cad/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/501c8fcc4e2f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/398e0c7df032/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/d3b8025f7522/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/12e72aacf750/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/fe7438e23e2e/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/9f546fbc7730/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/6ec97f7677f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/9a2701503cad/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/501c8fcc4e2f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/398e0c7df032/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/d3b8025f7522/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/12e72aacf750/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/9428816/fe7438e23e2e/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Idealized analysis of relative values of bidirectional versus unidirectional electric vehicle charging in deeply decarbonized electricity systems.深度脱碳电力系统中双向与单向电动汽车充电相对价值的理想化分析。
iScience. 2022 Aug 11;25(9):104906. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104906. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
2
Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.私人与共享、自动化电动汽车在美国个人交通中的应用:能源利用、温室气体排放、电网整合以及成本影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 2;55(5):3229-3239. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06655. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Design and simulation of 4 kW solar power-based hybrid EV charging station.基于4千瓦太阳能的混合动力电动汽车充电站的设计与仿真
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 27;14(1):7336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56833-5.
4
Exploring the role of electric vehicles in Africa's energy transition: A Nigerian case study.探索电动汽车在非洲能源转型中的作用:以尼日利亚为例的研究。
iScience. 2022 Feb 14;25(3):103926. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103926. eCollection 2022 Mar 18.
5
Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
6
Optimizing microgrid performance: Strategic integration of electric vehicle charging with renewable energy and storage systems for total operation cost and emissions minimization.优化微电网性能:电动汽车充电与可再生能源和储能系统的战略集成,以实现总成本和排放最小化。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0307810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307810. eCollection 2024.
7
Economic and Environmental Feasibility of Second-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries as Fast-Charging Energy Storage.作为快速充电储能的二次锂离子电池的经济和环境可行性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 2;54(11):6878-6887. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05883. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.协调电动汽车的推广应用:排放量和燃料使用量减少两位数,每辆车每年节省 40 美元。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 17;47(18):10703-7. doi: 10.1021/es4016926. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
10
A scenario-based approach to predict energy demand and carbon emission of electric vehicles on the electric grid.基于场景的方法来预测电网中电动汽车的能源需求和碳排放。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(51):77300-77310. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21214-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles.一种用于评估电池和燃料电池电动汽车灵活性价值的跨尺度框架。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 4;15(1):280. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43884-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrification of transportation means a lot more than a lot more electric vehicles.交通运输的电气化意义远不止于更多的电动汽车。
iScience. 2022 May 7;25(6):104376. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104376. eCollection 2022 Jun 17.
2
The quantity-quality transition in the value of expanding wind and solar power generation.扩大风能和太阳能发电价值中的量质转变。
iScience. 2022 Mar 22;25(4):104140. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104140. eCollection 2022 Apr 15.
3
Exploring the role of electric vehicles in Africa's energy transition: A Nigerian case study.
探索电动汽车在非洲能源转型中的作用:以尼日利亚为例的研究。
iScience. 2022 Feb 14;25(3):103926. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103926. eCollection 2022 Mar 18.
4
Overcoming Major Barriers to Developing Successful Sensors for Practical Applications Using Functional Nucleic Acids.利用功能核酸克服实用传感器开发中的主要障碍。
Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2022 Jun 13;15(1):151-171. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061020-104216. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Distribution grid impacts of electric vehicles: A California case study.电动汽车对配电网的影响:加利福尼亚州案例研究。
iScience. 2021 Dec 28;25(1):103686. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103686. eCollection 2022 Jan 21.
6
Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide.全球太阳能和风能发电可靠性的地球物理限制因素。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 22;12(1):6146. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26355-z.
7
Wind and Solar Resource Droughts in California Highlight the Benefits of Long-Term Storage and Integration with the Western Interconnect.加州的风能和太阳能资源短缺凸显了长期存储和与西部互联电网集成的好处。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 4;55(9):6214-6226. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07848. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Effects of Deep Reductions in Energy Storage Costs on Highly Reliable Wind and Solar Electricity Systems.储能成本大幅降低对高可靠性风能和太阳能发电系统的影响。
iScience. 2020 Aug 20;23(9):101484. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101484. eCollection 2020 Sep 25.
9
The emergence of cost effective battery storage.高性价比电池存储的出现。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 2;10(1):2038. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09988-z.