Suppr超能文献

用于鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌的快速凝固酶方法的评估。

Evaluation of rapid coagulase methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

作者信息

Berke A, Tilton R C

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 May;23(5):916-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.916-919.1986.

Abstract

Four rapid latex agglutination assays, StaphAurex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Research Triangle Park, N.C.), Bacto Staph (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), SeroSTAT (Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, R.I.), Veri-Staph (Zeus Technologies, Raritan, N.J.), and two hemagglutination tests, Staphyloslide (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and Hemastaph (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.), were compared with the conventional slide coagulase, tube coagulase (TC), and thermonuclease (TNase) tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 118 clinical isolates of S. aureus (52 methicillin resistant), 50 S. epidermidis, 5 S. capitis, 2 S. hominis, 3 S. simulans, 6 S. saprophyticus, and 2 S. warneri were tested. The slide coagulase, TC and TNase tests detected 115 (97.5%), 117 (99.2%), and 118 (100%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. All showed 100% specificity. The StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph assays correctly identified 117 (99.2%), 117 (99.2%), 116 (98.3%), 110 (93.2%), 108 (91.5%), and 107 (90.7%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. For methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph showed 1 (2%), 1 (2%), 2 (4%), 7 (13.5%), 7 (13.5%), and 8 (15.4%) false-negative results, respectively. All the commercial agglutination assays demonstrated false-positive results with strains of S. capitis, S. saprophyticus and S. warneri. The overall accuracy of the commercial agglutination assays compared with TC and TNase ranged from 90.7 to 99.2%. We recommend that negative reactions with the rapid commercial test kits for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus isolates be confirmed with the TC or TNase test.

摘要

将四种快速乳胶凝集试验(即StaphAurex,由北卡罗来纳州三角研究园的威康诊断公司生产;Bacto Staph,由密歇根州底特律的迪福科实验室生产;SeroSTAT,由罗德岛州菲斯克维尔的斯科特实验室公司生产;Veri-Staph,由新泽西州拉里坦的宙斯技术公司生产)以及两种血凝试验(即Staphyloslide,由马里兰州科基斯维尔的BBL微生物系统公司生产;Hemastaph,由堪萨斯州莱尼克斯的雷梅尔公司生产)与传统的玻片凝固酶试验、试管凝固酶试验(TC)和耐热核酸酶试验(TNase)进行比较,以鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌。共检测了118株金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株(其中52株对甲氧西林耐药)、50株表皮葡萄球菌、5株头状葡萄球菌、2株人葡萄球菌、3株模仿葡萄球菌、6株腐生葡萄球菌和2株沃氏葡萄球菌。玻片凝固酶试验、TC试验和TNase试验分别检测出115株(97.5%)、117株(99.2%)和118株(100%)金黄色葡萄球菌分离株。所有试验的特异性均为100%。StaphAurex试验、Veri-Staph试验、Staphyloslide试验、Hemastaph试验、SeroSTAT试验和Bacto Staph试验分别正确鉴定出117株(99.2%)、117株(99.2%)、116株(98.3%)、110株(93.2%)、108株(91.5%)和107株(90.7%)金黄色葡萄球菌分离株。对于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株,StaphAurex试验、Veri-Staph试验、Staphyloslide试验、Hemastaph试验、SeroSTAT试验和Bacto Staph试验的假阴性结果分别为1株(2%)、1株(2%)、2株(4%)、7株(13.5%)、7株(13.5%)和8株(15.4%)。所有商业凝集试验对头状葡萄球菌、腐生葡萄球菌和沃氏葡萄球菌菌株均显示出假阳性结果。与TC试验和TNase试验相比,商业凝集试验的总体准确率在90.7%至99.2%之间。我们建议,对于耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌分离株的快速商业检测试剂盒出现的阴性反应,要用TC试验或TNase试验进行确认。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
An Update on Clinical Burden, Diagnostic Tools, and Therapeutic Options of .关于……的临床负担、诊断工具和治疗选择的最新情况
Infect Dis (Auckl). 2017 May 22;10:1179916117703999. doi: 10.1177/1179916117703999. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Significance of protein a production by staphylococci.葡萄球菌产生蛋白 A 的意义。
Infect Immun. 1970 Nov;2(5):672-3. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.5.672-673.1970.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验