Baker C N, Stocker S A, Rhoden D L, Thornsberry C
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):143-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.143-148.1986.
The American MicroScan (American MicroScan, Mahwah, N.J.) identification and antimicrobial susceptibility system consists in part of an automated reading system (autoSCAN-4) with data management capabilities. We evaluated the system with 404 gram-negative and 170 gram-positive facultative anaerobic and aerobic bacteria. We compared MicroScan results read automatically and visually with each other and with the results obtained by the reference method (read visually). The overall agreement within +/- 1 log2 dilution was 94.3% when the MicroScan system (read automatically) was compared with the reference method (read visually), 96.4% when MicroScan panels (read visually) were compared with reference panels, and 97.4% when the autoSCAN-4 automated reading was compared with the visual reading of the MicroScan panels. Total discrepancies (susceptibility interpretation category changes) for the MicroScan system compared with the reference method were 7%, with 6.2% considered a minor discrepancy. The autoSCAN-4 and the complete MicroScan system yielded accurate results compared with the reference method.
美国MicroScan(位于新泽西州马霍瓦的美国MicroScan公司)鉴定及药敏系统部分由具备数据管理能力的自动读数系统(autoSCAN-4)组成。我们用404株革兰氏阴性菌以及170株革兰氏阳性兼性厌氧和需氧菌对该系统进行了评估。我们将MicroScan自动读数结果和目视读数结果相互比较,并与参考方法(目视读数)所得结果进行比较。当将MicroScan系统(自动读数)与参考方法(目视读数)相比较时,在±1 log2稀释范围内的总体一致性为94.3%;当将MicroScan平板(目视读数)与参考平板相比较时,一致性为96.4%;当将autoSCAN-4自动读数与MicroScan平板的目视读数相比较时,一致性为97.4%。与参考方法相比,MicroScan系统的总差异(药敏解读类别变化)为7%,其中6.2%被视为微小差异。与参考方法相比,autoSCAN-4及完整的MicroScan系统均得出了准确结果。