Ranjbar Sara, Singleton Kyle W, Curtin Lee, Paulson Lisa, Clark-Swanson Kamala, Hawkins-Daarud Andrea, Mitchell J Ross, Jackson Pamela R, Swanson And Kristin R
Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix AZ 85054, USA.
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
medRxiv. 2023 Jun 5:2023.05.31.23290537. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.31.23290537.
Identification of key phenotypic regions such as necrosis, contrast enhancement, and edema on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for understanding disease evolution and treatment response in patients with glioma. Manual delineation is time intensive and not feasible for a clinical workflow. Automating phenotypic region segmentation overcomes many issues with manual segmentation, however, current glioma segmentation datasets focus on pre-treatment, diagnostic scans, where treatment effects and surgical cavities are not present. Thus, existing automatic segmentation models are not applicable to post-treatment imaging that is used for longitudinal evaluation of care. Here, we present a comparison of three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (nnU-Net architecture) trained on large temporally defined pre-treatment, post-treatment, and mixed cohorts. We used a total of 1563 imaging timepoints from 854 patients curated from 13 different institutions as well as diverse public data sets to understand the capabilities and limitations of automatic segmentation on glioma images with different phenotypic and treatment appearance. We assessed the performance of models using Dice coefficients on test cases from each group comparing predictions with manual segmentations generated by trained technicians. We demonstrate that training a combined model can be as effective as models trained on just one temporal group. The results highlight the importance of a diverse training set, that includes images from the course of disease and with effects from treatment, in the creation of a model that can accurately segment glioma MRIs at multiple treatment time points.
在磁共振成像(MRI)上识别坏死、对比增强和水肿等关键表型区域,对于理解胶质瘤患者的疾病进展和治疗反应至关重要。手动勾勒轮廓耗时且不适用于临床工作流程。自动分割表型区域克服了手动分割的许多问题,然而,目前的胶质瘤分割数据集侧重于治疗前的诊断扫描,其中不存在治疗效果和手术腔。因此,现有的自动分割模型不适用于用于纵向护理评估的治疗后成像。在此,我们比较了在大型时间定义的治疗前、治疗后和混合队列上训练的三维卷积神经网络(nnU-Net架构)。我们使用了来自13个不同机构的854名患者的总共1563个成像时间点以及各种公共数据集,以了解自动分割在具有不同表型和治疗外观的胶质瘤图像上的能力和局限性。我们使用Dice系数评估模型在每组测试病例上的性能,将预测结果与训练有素的技术人员生成的手动分割结果进行比较。我们证明,训练一个组合模型可以与仅在一个时间组上训练的模型一样有效。结果强调了多样化训练集的重要性,该训练集包括疾病过程中的图像和具有治疗效果的图像,对于创建一个能够在多个治疗时间点准确分割胶质瘤MRI的模型而言。