• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于非政府行为者在法律框架内塑造草原生态补偿的综合研究。

A comprehensive study on non-governmental actors in shaping grassland ecological compensation within legal frameworks.

机构信息

College of Politics and Law, Northeast Normal University, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.

School of Marxism, Xidian University, Xi'an City, Shanxi Province, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 6;14(1):5489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56146-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-56146-7
PMID:38448478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10917782/
Abstract

Ecological compensation has emerged as a crucial institutional framework for managing the interplay between ecological preservation and economic development in China. This study focuses on the specific case of grassland ecological compensation to investigate the protection of rights and interests of non-governmental subjects. By utilizing data derived from questionnaire responses, this study examines the legal rights, obligations, and responsibilities associated with grassland ecological compensation. Statistical techniques such as Z-distribution, chi-square test, and non-parametric measures of correlation are employed to analyze the collected data, which are presented using tables and graphs. Furthermore, this research evaluates the current state of rights and interests of compensation subjects engaged in ecological compensation practices, aiming to enhance our comprehension and assessment of the extent to which the ecological compensation system safeguards the rights and interests of individuals. The findings show that a substantial number of respondents see current grassland ecological compensation methods in China as reasonable but insufficient, indicating a need for method diversification. There's a clear preference for a shared responsibility model over government-only funding, especially in regions with large grassland areas. This highlights the necessity for adaptable laws and a legal framework that accommodates diverse stakeholder needs. Additionally, the importance of clear property rights is emphasized for sustainable land use. The study suggests legislative reform towards a more equitable and effective approach to grassland conservation, providing valuable recommendations for refining and advancing the ecological compensation system.Author name 1 (Ziqi Liu) mismatch between ms and metadata. We have foolowed metadata. Kindly check and confirm.The metadata is right. Thank you.

摘要

生态补偿已成为中国管理生态保护与经济发展相互作用的关键制度框架。本研究聚焦于草原生态补偿的具体案例,旨在探讨对非政府主体权益的保护。本研究通过问卷调查数据,考察了草原生态补偿所涉及的法律权利、义务和责任。采用 Z 分布、卡方检验和非参数相关性度量等统计技术对收集的数据进行分析,并以表格和图形的形式呈现。此外,本研究评估了参与生态补偿实践的补偿主体的权益现状,旨在增强对生态补偿制度保障个人权益程度的理解和评估。研究结果表明,相当一部分受访者认为中国现行的草原生态补偿方法合理但不足,需要多样化补偿方法。相较于政府单一出资,受访者更倾向于共同责任模式,尤其是在草原面积较大的地区。这突显了适应法律和法律框架的必要性,以满足不同利益相关者的需求。此外,明确产权对于可持续土地利用至关重要。研究建议对草原保护进行立法改革,以实现更加公平和有效的方法,为完善和推进生态补偿制度提供了有价值的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/be35275be81c/41598_2024_56146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/06ab2270c97d/41598_2024_56146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/6981a895b25e/41598_2024_56146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/98064de8e541/41598_2024_56146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/be35275be81c/41598_2024_56146_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/06ab2270c97d/41598_2024_56146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/6981a895b25e/41598_2024_56146_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/98064de8e541/41598_2024_56146_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc1c/10917782/be35275be81c/41598_2024_56146_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comprehensive study on non-governmental actors in shaping grassland ecological compensation within legal frameworks.关于非政府行为者在法律框架内塑造草原生态补偿的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 6;14(1):5489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56146-7.
2
Cooperative grassland management practices promoted by land tenure system transformation benefit social-ecological systems of pastoralism on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, China.土地制度变革推动的草地协同管理实践有益于中国青藏高原牧民生态系统。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110215. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110215. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
On the Relationship between Economic Development, Environmental Integrity and Well-Being: The Point of View of Herdsmen in Northern China Grassland.论经济发展、环境生态与福祉之间的关系:来自中国北方草原牧民的视角
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0134786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134786. eCollection 2015.
4
Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences of China's Provincial Carbon Emissions and Ecological Compensation Based on Land Carbon Budget Accounting.基于土地碳预算核算的中国省级碳排放与生态补偿的时空差异研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412892.
5
[Ecological compensation strategy of the old revolutionary base areas along the route of Long March based on ecosystem service value evaluation].基于生态系统服务价值评估的长征沿线革命老区生态补偿策略
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jan;33(1):159-168. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.019.
6
Economic Development, Fiscal Ecological Compensation, and Ecological Environment Quality.经济发展、财政生态补偿与生态环境质量
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084725.
7
Effects of Value Perception, Environmental Regulation and Their Interaction on the Improvement of Herdsmen's Grassland Ecological Policy Satisfaction.牧民对草原生态政策满意度的影响因素研究——基于牧民价值观感知、环境规制及其交互项的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;18(6):3078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063078.
8
Reasons and resolution approaches of environmental conflict in grassland areas: An empirical study in contemporary northern China.草原地区环境冲突的原因及解决途径:当代中国北方的实证研究
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116291. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
[Ecology-economy harmonious development based on the ecological services value change in Yanqi Basin, Northwest China].基于中国西北焉耆盆地生态系统服务价值变化的生态-经济协调发展
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Mar;26(3):875-83.
10
How can an ecological compensation threshold be determined? A discriminant model integrating the minimum data approach and the most appropriate land use scenarios.如何确定生态补偿阈值?一种整合最小数据方法和最合适土地利用情景的判别模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 15;852:158377. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158377. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Research on the Coordinated Governance Mechanism of Cross-Regional and Cross-Basin Ecological Compensation in the Yangtze River Delta.长三角跨区域跨流域生态补偿协同治理机制研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169881.
2
Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era.有序分位数归一化:一种为交叉验证时代构建的半参数变换。
J Appl Stat. 2019 Jun 15;47(13-15):2312-2327. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372. eCollection 2020.
3
From "blood transfusion" to "hematopoiesis": watershed eco-compensation in China.
从“输血”到“造血”:中国的流域生态补偿
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(33):49583-49597. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20876-w. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Economic Development, Fiscal Ecological Compensation, and Ecological Environment Quality.经济发展、财政生态补偿与生态环境质量
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084725.
5
Operationalisation of ecological compensation - Obstacles and ways forward.生态补偿的实施——障碍与途径。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114277. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Research on Modern Marine Environmental Governance in China: Subject Identification, Structural Characteristics, and Operational Mechanisms.中国现代海洋环境治理研究:主体识别、结构特征与运行机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;18(9):4485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094485.
7
Ecological Compensation Standard of Trans-Boundary River Basin Based on Ecological Spillover Value: A Case Study for the Lancang-Mekong River Basin.基于生态溢出价值的跨界流域生态补偿标准——以澜沧江-湄公河流域为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 30;18(3):1251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031251.
8
Regional Differences in Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land Protection: An Analysis of Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.耕地保护生态补偿的区域差异研究——以四川省成都市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 8;17(21):8242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218242.
9
Eco-compensation in China: Theory, practices and suggestions for the future.中国的生态补偿:理论、实践与未来建议。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Mar 15;210:162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.077.
10
Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China.加强中国生物多样性和生态系统服务的保护区建设。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 14;114(7):1601-1606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620503114. Epub 2017 Jan 30.