Burge P S, Finnegan M, Horsfield N, Emery D, Austwick P, Davies P S, Pickering C A
Thorax. 1985 Apr;40(4):248-54. doi: 10.1136/thx.40.4.248.
Thirty five printers who had work related wheeze, chest tightness, or breathlessness kept two hourly records of their peak expiratory flow for at least two weeks. They all worked in a factory supplied by air from contaminated humidifiers. The peak flow records showed consistent work related deterioration in 15 workers, nine of whom had a diurnal variation in peak flow exceeding 20%. Ten workers kept further records after the humidifiers had been cleaned, other work practices remaining unchanged. There was substantial improvement in all 10 workers, implying that material from the contaminated humidifier was the cause of the work related changes in peak flow. The patterns of work related changes in peak flow fell into four groups: falls maximal on the first work day, falls maximal midweek, falls equivalent each work day, and falls progressive throughout the working week. Three quarters of this last group had immediate prick test responses to humidifier antigen, which were negative in all the others with work related changes in peak flow. This suggests that the progressive daily deterioration pattern alone is due to an IgE mediated response to humidifier antigens. A large range of microorganisms was identified in the humidifiers. No single microorganism appeared to be the antigen responsible for the precipitating antibody seen in 75% of the study population.
35名患有与工作相关的喘息、胸闷或呼吸急促的印刷工人,至少连续两周每两小时记录一次他们的呼气峰值流速。他们都在一家由受污染加湿器供应空气的工厂工作。峰值流速记录显示,15名工人的情况与工作相关且持续恶化,其中9人的峰值流速昼夜变化超过20%。在加湿器清洁后,10名工人继续进行记录,其他工作方式保持不变。所有10名工人的情况都有显著改善,这意味着受污染加湿器中的物质是与工作相关的峰值流速变化的原因。与工作相关的峰值流速变化模式分为四组:在第一个工作日下降最大、在一周中间下降最大、每个工作日下降程度相同、在整个工作周逐渐下降。最后一组中有四分之三的人对加湿器抗原立即出现点刺试验反应,而在所有其他有与工作相关的峰值流速变化的人中,该反应均为阴性。这表明,仅逐渐恶化的每日模式是由对加湿器抗原的IgE介导反应引起的。在加湿器中鉴定出了大量微生物。没有单一微生物似乎是导致75%的研究人群中出现沉淀抗体的抗原。