Morinet F, Ferchal F, Colimon R, Pérol Y
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;3(2):136-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02014331.
The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost ) and a latex agglutination test ( Rotalex ). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex , 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost , 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex .
电子显微镜检查、免疫电子显微镜检查、细胞培养中的免疫荧光检查、两种酶免疫测定法(Rotazyme、Enzygnost)和乳胶凝集试验(Rotalex)。从112名腹泻儿童中采集了样本。不同检测方法对人轮状病毒的相对敏感性如下:电子显微镜检查为84%;免疫荧光检查为86%;Rotalex为88%;Rotazyme为89%;免疫电子显微镜检查为93%;Enzygnost为98%。根据我们的研究结果,Enzygnost是最敏感的方法,但Rotalex对少量粪便样本的筛查更有价值。在两种酶免疫测定法或Rotalex中均未观察到假阳性结果。